• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 SEER-Medicare 理赔数据开发和优化膀胱癌算法。

Development and Optimization of a Bladder Cancer Algorithm Using SEER-Medicare Claims Data.

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Pfizer Inc, Bothell, WA.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Sep;8:e2400073. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00073.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00073
PMID:39298694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11421559/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Categorizing patients with cancer by their disease stage can be an important tool when conducting administrative claims-based studies. As claims databases frequently do not capture this information, algorithms are increasingly used to define disease stage. To our knowledge, to date, no study has used an algorithm to categorize patients with bladder cancer (BC) by disease stage (non-muscle-invasive BC [NMIBC], muscle-invasive BC [MIBC], or locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma [la/mUC]) in a US-based health care claims database.

METHODS

A claims-based algorithm was developed to categorize patients by disease stage on the basis of the administrative claims portion of the SEER-Medicare linked data. The algorithm was validated against a reference SEER registry, and the algorithm's parameters were iteratively modified to improve its performance. Patients were included if they had an initial diagnosis of BC between January 2016 and December 2017 recorded in SEER registry data. Medicare claims data were available for these patients until December 31, 2019. The algorithm was evaluated by assessing percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa (κ), specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) against the SEER categorization.

RESULTS

A total of 15,484 patients with SEER-confirmed BC were included: 10,991 (71.0%) with NMIBC, 3,645 (23.5%) with MIBC, and 848 (5.5%) with la/mUC. After multiple rounds of algorithm optimization, the final algorithm had an agreement of 82.5% with SEER, with a κ of 0.58, a PPV of 87.0% for NMIBC, and 76.8% for MIBC and a high NPV for la/mUC of 98.0%.

CONCLUSION

This claims-based algorithm could be a useful approach for researchers conducting claims-based studies categorizing patients with BC at diagnosis.

摘要

目的

在进行基于行政索赔的研究时,通过疾病阶段对癌症患者进行分类可能是一种重要的工具。由于索赔数据库通常无法捕获此信息,因此越来越多地使用算法来定义疾病阶段。据我们所知,迄今为止,尚无研究在基于美国医疗保健索赔数据库中使用算法对膀胱癌 (BC) 患者进行疾病阶段(非肌肉浸润性 BC [NMIBC]、肌肉浸润性 BC [MIBC] 或局部晚期/转移性尿路上皮癌 [la/mUC])分类。

方法

开发了一种基于索赔的算法,根据 SEER-Medicare 链接数据的行政索赔部分对患者进行疾病阶段分类。该算法针对 SEER 登记处进行了验证,并迭代修改算法参数以提高其性能。如果患者在 SEER 登记处数据中记录了 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月之间的初始 BC 诊断,则将其纳入研究。这些患者的 Medicare 索赔数据可用于 2019 年 12 月 31 日。该算法通过评估与 SEER 分类的百分比一致性、Cohen 的 kappa(κ)、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV) 来进行评估。

结果

共有 15484 名经 SEER 证实患有 BC 的患者被纳入研究:10991 名(71.0%)为 NMIBC,3645 名(23.5%)为 MIBC,848 名(5.5%)为 la/mUC。经过多轮算法优化,最终算法与 SEER 的一致性为 82.5%,κ 值为 0.58,NMIBC 的 PPV 为 87.0%,MIBC 的 PPV 为 76.8%,la/mUC 的 NPV 较高,为 98.0%。

结论

这种基于索赔的算法可能是研究人员在进行基于索赔的研究时对诊断时的 BC 患者进行分类的有用方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/11421559/cf6a81a3658e/cci-8-e2400073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/11421559/f0cb1c4d716b/cci-8-e2400073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/11421559/cf6a81a3658e/cci-8-e2400073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/11421559/f0cb1c4d716b/cci-8-e2400073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/11421559/cf6a81a3658e/cci-8-e2400073-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Optimization of a Bladder Cancer Algorithm Using SEER-Medicare Claims Data.利用 SEER-Medicare 理赔数据开发和优化膀胱癌算法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Sep;8:e2400073. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00073.
2
Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.评估三种算法以在医疗保险索赔数据中识别新发乳腺癌。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):2056-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00705.x.
3
External validation of a claims-based algorithm for classifying kidney-cancer surgeries.一种基于索赔数据的肾癌手术分类算法的外部验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 6;9:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-92.
4
An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.一种利用医疗保险理赔数据识别新发乳腺癌女性患者的算法。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00315.x.
5
Bladder Cancer Stage Development, 2004-2014 in Europe Compared With the United States: Analysis of European Population-based Cancer Registries, the United States SEER Database, and a Large Tertiary Institutional Cohort.欧洲与美国 2004-2014 年膀胱癌分期发展比较:基于人群的欧洲癌症登记处、美国 SEER 数据库和大型三级机构队列分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Jun;18(3):162-170.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Limited validity of diagnosis codes in Medicare claims for identifying cancer metastases and inferring stage.医疗保险索赔中诊断代码对识别癌症转移和推断分期的有效性有限。
Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;24(9):666-72, 672.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.06.099. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
7
Algorithm to Identify Incident Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cases Using Claims Data.利用索赔数据识别偶发性上皮性卵巢癌病例的算法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Mar;6:e2100187. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00187.
8
Development and validation of coding algorithms to identify patients with incident lung cancer in United States healthcare claims data.在美国医疗保健理赔数据中识别新发肺癌患者的编码算法的开发与验证
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1465-1479. doi: 10.1002/pds.5137. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
9
Classifying Stage IV Lung Cancer From Health Care Claims: A Comparison of Multiple Analytic Approaches.基于医疗保健理赔记录对IV期肺癌进行分类:多种分析方法的比较
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 May;3:1-19. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00156.
10
Association of Age with Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Unearthing a Biological Basis for Epidemiological Disparities?年龄与非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的关联:能否揭示流行病学差异的生物学基础?
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Oct;7(5):1069-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation to correct for outcome misclassification bias.用于校正结局误分类偏倚的验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jun;32(6):700-703. doi: 10.1002/pds.5601. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
2
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
3
Understanding Treatment Patterns and Outcomes among Patients with De Novo Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: A Population-Level Retrospective Analysis from Alberta, Canada.理解初治不可切除局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者的治疗模式和结局:来自加拿大阿尔伯塔省的人群水平回顾性分析。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 12;29(10):7587-7597. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100599.
4
Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Validation of health outcomes of interest within real-world healthcare databases.药物流行病学的核心概念:在真实医疗保健数据库中验证感兴趣的健康结果。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.5537. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
Bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.膀胱癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(3):244-258. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
6
Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value.医学研究中的基本统计学原理:灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 16;57(5):503. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050503.
7
Epidemiology and treatment patterns for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic literature review and gap analysis.局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的流行病学和治疗模式:系统文献回顾和差距分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Feb;27(2):240-255. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20285. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer.膀胱癌流行病学
Med Sci (Basel). 2020 Mar 13;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/medsci8010015.
9
Development of predictive models to identify advanced-stage cancer patients in a US healthcare claims database.开发预测模型,以在美国医疗保健索赔数据库中识别晚期癌症患者。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;61:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Classifying Stage IV Lung Cancer From Health Care Claims: A Comparison of Multiple Analytic Approaches.基于医疗保健理赔记录对IV期肺癌进行分类:多种分析方法的比较
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 May;3:1-19. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00156.