Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.017. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
Academic cardiac surgeons are productive researchers and innovators. We sought to perform a comprehensive machine learning (ML)-based characterization of cardiac surgery research over the past 40 y to identify trends in research pursuits.
US-based academic websites were queried for surgeon profiles. Publications since 1980 were obtained from Web of Science, and publication classifications (e.g., "human", "animal") were collected through the National Institutes of Health iCite tool. Publications were deemed "basic or translational" if >50% of their classification was under "animal" or "molecular or cell", and "clinical" if otherwise. ML-based clustering was performed on publication titles and Medical Subject Heading terms to identify research topics.
A total of 944 cardiac surgeons accounted for 48,031 unique publications. Average citations per year have decreased since 1980 (P < 0.001). The percentage of basic or translational publications by cardiac surgeons has decreased over time (P < 0.001), comprising of only 8% of publications in 2022. Adult cardiac surgeons, those who received an F32, K08, or R01, and those with a PhD were more likely to publish basic or translational research. Top areas of basic or translational research were myocardial reperfusion, aortic aneurysms or remodeling, and transplant immunology. Major areas of clinical research included aortic disease, aortic valve disease, and mechanical circulatory support. Collaboration analysis revealed that 55% of publications were single-center, and the yearly percentage of these publications has decreased over time (P < 0.001).
Cardiac surgeons are performing less basic or translational research relative to clinical research than ever before. The majority of publications over the past 40 y did not involve cross-center collaboration. Continued support for clinical research is needed, while also encouraging collaborative basic or translational science to foster innovation in patient care.
学术型心脏外科医生是高产的研究人员和创新者。我们试图通过基于机器学习(ML)的方法对过去 40 年来的心脏外科学术研究进行全面分析,以确定研究方向的趋势。
在美国的学术网站上查询外科医生的个人资料。从 Web of Science 获取 1980 年以来的出版物,通过美国国立卫生研究院的 iCite 工具收集出版物分类(例如,“人类”、“动物”)。如果分类中超过 50%的内容属于“动物”或“分子或细胞”,则将出版物视为“基础或转化”;否则视为“临床”。基于 ML 的聚类分析在出版物标题和医学主题词上进行,以确定研究主题。
共有 944 名心脏外科医生发表了 48031 篇独特的论文。自 1980 年以来,每年的平均引文数呈下降趋势(P < 0.001)。心脏外科医生发表的基础或转化研究论文的比例随着时间的推移而减少(P < 0.001),2022 年仅占出版物的 8%。成年心脏外科医生、获得 F32、K08 或 R01 的医生以及拥有博士学位的医生更有可能发表基础或转化研究。基础或转化研究的主要领域包括心肌再灌注、主动脉瘤或重塑以及移植免疫学。临床研究的主要领域包括主动脉疾病、主动脉瓣疾病和机械循环支持。合作分析表明,55%的出版物为单中心研究,且这些出版物的年比例随着时间的推移呈下降趋势(P < 0.001)。
与临床研究相比,心脏外科医生进行的基础或转化研究相对较少。过去 40 年来,超过一半的出版物未涉及跨中心合作。需要继续支持临床研究,同时鼓励开展合作基础或转化科学,以促进患者护理的创新。