Suppr超能文献

巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期B-C期肝细胞癌诊断时胆管侵犯的临床意义:韩国一项全国性队列分析

Clinical Significance of Biliary Invasion at Diagnosis in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B-C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis in South Korea.

作者信息

Rim Chai Hong, Yoon Won Sup, Park Sunmin

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.

Korean Liver Cancer Association, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Oncology. 2025;103(4):298-310. doi: 10.1159/000541545. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of biliary invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. We aimed to verify the significance of clinically diagnosed biliary involvement in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C (BCLC B-C) HCC.

METHODS

The Korean Liver Cancer Study Group randomly extracted data of patients with HCC enrolled in the Korean Central Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2016 from approximately 50 hospitals nationwide. After excluding records without information regarding serum bilirubin level, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and Child-Pugh class, a pre-propensity score matching cohort comprising 4,077 patients was included. Considering age, sex, body mass index, viral cause, serum bilirubin level, AFP, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, multiplicity, portal invasion, and extrahepatic metastasis, patients with and without bile duct invasion at initial imaging diagnosis were matched at a ratio of 1:2 from the pre-propensity score matching cohort to form a matched cohort (propensity score matching cohort).

RESULTS

The pre-propensity score matching cohort included 4,077 patients with BCLC B-C and 165 (4.0%) with biliary invasion at diagnosis. Regarding biliary invasion at diagnosis, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 54% and 40.9% (without invasion), respectively (p < 0.0001). Corresponding cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 56.6% and 44% (without invasion), respectively (p < 0.0001). Although biliary invasion was a significant factor affecting overall and CSS rates in a univariate analysis, it was not statistically significant in multivariate analyses for overall (p = 0.153) and cancer-specific (p = 0.198) survival rates. The propensity score matching cohort included 165 patients with biliary invasion at diagnosis and 330 without biliary invasion. In the propensity score matching cohort, biliary invasion at diagnosis was not a significant factor affecting overall (p = 0.603) or cancer-specific (p = 0.960) survival rates in the univariate analyses. One- and 2-year OS were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 36.1% and 28.2% (without invasion), respectively. The corresponding CSS at one and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 39.8% and 31.4% (without invasion), respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that AFP levels, Child-Pugh class, tumor singularity, tumor size, portal invasion, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases significantly affected both overall and CSS rates.

CONCLUSION

Biliary invasion at diagnosis in patients with BCLC B-C does not affect overall or CSS rates; however, other prognostic factors associated with biliary invasion could have a greater impact.

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of biliary invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. We aimed to verify the significance of clinically diagnosed biliary involvement in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C (BCLC B-C) HCC.

METHODS

The Korean Liver Cancer Study Group randomly extracted data of patients with HCC enrolled in the Korean Central Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2016 from approximately 50 hospitals nationwide. After excluding records without information regarding serum bilirubin level, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and Child-Pugh class, a pre-propensity score matching cohort comprising 4,077 patients was included. Considering age, sex, body mass index, viral cause, serum bilirubin level, AFP, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, multiplicity, portal invasion, and extrahepatic metastasis, patients with and without bile duct invasion at initial imaging diagnosis were matched at a ratio of 1:2 from the pre-propensity score matching cohort to form a matched cohort (propensity score matching cohort).

RESULTS

The pre-propensity score matching cohort included 4,077 patients with BCLC B-C and 165 (4.0%) with biliary invasion at diagnosis. Regarding biliary invasion at diagnosis, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 54% and 40.9% (without invasion), respectively (p < 0.0001). Corresponding cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 56.6% and 44% (without invasion), respectively (p < 0.0001). Although biliary invasion was a significant factor affecting overall and CSS rates in a univariate analysis, it was not statistically significant in multivariate analyses for overall (p = 0.153) and cancer-specific (p = 0.198) survival rates. The propensity score matching cohort included 165 patients with biliary invasion at diagnosis and 330 without biliary invasion. In the propensity score matching cohort, biliary invasion at diagnosis was not a significant factor affecting overall (p = 0.603) or cancer-specific (p = 0.960) survival rates in the univariate analyses. One- and 2-year OS were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 36.1% and 28.2% (without invasion), respectively. The corresponding CSS at one and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 39.8% and 31.4% (without invasion), respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that AFP levels, Child-Pugh class, tumor singularity, tumor size, portal invasion, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases significantly affected both overall and CSS rates.

CONCLUSION

Biliary invasion at diagnosis in patients with BCLC B-C does not affect overall or CSS rates; however, other prognostic factors associated with biliary invasion could have a greater impact.

摘要

引言

肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,胆管侵犯作为预后因素的证据尚不清楚。我们旨在验证临床诊断的胆管受累在巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期B-C(BCLC B-C)的HCC患者中的意义。

方法

韩国肝癌研究组从全国约50家医院中随机提取了2011年至2016年在韩国中央癌症登记处登记的HCC患者的数据。在排除没有血清胆红素水平、甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平和Child-Pugh分级信息的记录后,纳入了一个由4077名患者组成的倾向得分匹配前队列。考虑到年龄、性别、体重指数、病毒病因、血清胆红素水平、AFP、Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤大小、数量、门静脉侵犯和肝外转移,在倾向得分匹配前队列中,将初次影像诊断时有和无胆管侵犯的患者按1:2的比例进行匹配,以形成一个匹配队列(倾向得分匹配队列)。

结果

倾向得分匹配前队列包括4077例BCLC B-C患者,其中165例(4.0%)在诊断时有胆管侵犯。关于诊断时的胆管侵犯,1年和2年总生存率(OS)分别为41.2%和29.1%(有侵犯)以及54%和40.9%(无侵犯)(p<0.0001)。1年和2年相应的癌症特异性生存率(CSS)分别为43.4%和30.7%(有侵犯)以及56.6%和44%(无侵犯)(p<0.0001)。虽然在单因素分析中胆管侵犯是影响总生存率和CSS的一个重要因素,但在多因素分析中,对于总生存率(p = 0.153)和癌症特异性生存率(p = 0.198)而言,它没有统计学意义。倾向得分匹配队列包括165例诊断时有胆管侵犯的患者和330例无胆管侵犯的患者。在倾向得分匹配队列中,诊断时的胆管侵犯在单因素分析中不是影响总生存率(p = 0.603)或癌症特异性生存率(p = 0.960)的重要因素。1年和2年OS分别为41.2%和29.1%(有侵犯)以及36.1%和28.2%(无侵犯)。1年和2年相应的CSS分别为43.4%和30.7%(有侵犯)以及39.8%和31.4%(无侵犯)。多因素分析显示,AFP水平、Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤单一性、肿瘤大小、门静脉侵犯、淋巴结转移和远处转移显著影响总生存率和CSS。

结论

BCLC B-C患者诊断时的胆管侵犯不影响总生存率或CSS;然而,与胆管侵犯相关的其他预后因素可能有更大影响。

引言

肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,胆管侵犯作为预后因素的证据尚不清楚。我们旨在验证临床诊断的胆管受累在巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期B-C(BCLC B-C)的HCC患者中的意义。

方法

韩国肝癌研究组从全国约50家医院中随机提取了2011年至2016年在韩国中央癌症登记处登记的HCC患者的数据。在排除没有血清胆红素水平、甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平和Child-Pugh分级信息的记录后,纳入了一个由4077名患者组成的倾向得分匹配前队列。考虑到年龄、性别、体重指数、病毒病因、血清胆红素水平、AFP、Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤大小、数量、门静脉侵犯和肝外转移,在倾向得分匹配前队列中,将初次影像诊断时有和无胆管侵犯的患者按1:2的比例进行匹配,以形成一个匹配队列(倾向得分匹配队列)。

结果

倾向得分匹配前队列包括4077例BCLC B-C患者,其中165例(4.0%)在诊断时有胆管侵犯。关于诊断时的胆管侵犯,1年和2年总生存率(OS)分别为41.2%和29.1%(有侵犯)以及54%和40.9%(无侵犯)(p<0.0001)。1年和2年相应的癌症特异性生存率(CSS)分别为43.4%和30.7%(有侵犯)以及56.6%和44%(无侵犯)(p<0.0001)。虽然在单因素分析中胆管侵犯是影响总生存率和CSS的一个重要因素,但在多因素分析中,对于总生存率(p = 0.153)和癌症特异性生存率(p = 0.198)而言,它没有统计学意义。倾向得分匹配队列包括165例诊断时有胆管侵犯的患者和330例无胆管侵犯的患者。在倾向得分匹配队列中,诊断时的胆管侵犯在单因素分析中不是影响总生存率(p = 0.603)或癌症特异性生存率(p = 0.960)的重要因素。1年和2年OS分别为41.2%和29.1%(有侵犯)以及36.1%和28.2%(无侵犯)。1年和2年相应的CSS分别为43.4%和30.7%(有侵犯)以及39.8%和31.4%(无侵犯)。多因素分析显示,AFP水平、Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤单一性、肿瘤大小、门静脉侵犯、淋巴结转移和远处转移显著影响总生存率和CSS。

结论

BCLC B-C患者诊断时的胆管侵犯不影响总生存率或CSS;然而,与胆管侵犯相关的其他预后因素可能有更大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c2/11965834/d2204c3b8a47/ocl-2025-0103-0004-541545_F01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验