Suppr超能文献

SWAT模型与深度学习模型在估算马里兰州塔卡霍溪流域硝酸盐负荷方面的比较效率

Comparative efficiency of the SWAT model and a deep learning model in estimating nitrate loads at the Tuckahoe creek watershed, Maryland.

作者信息

Lee Jiye, Kim Dongho, Hong Seokmin, Yun Daeun, Kwon Dohyuck, Hill Robert L, Gao Feng, Zhang Xuesong, Cho Kyung Hwa, Lee Sangchul, Pachepsky Yakov

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.

School of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 1;954:176256. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176256. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Abstract

Modeling nitrate fate and transport in water sources is an essential component of predictive water quality management. Both mechanistic and data-driven models are currently in use. Mechanistic models, such as SWAT, simulate daily nitrate loads based on the results of simulating water flow. Data-driven models allow one to simulate nitrate loads and water flow independently. Performance of SWAT and deep learning model was evaluated in cases when deep learning model is used in (a) independent simulations of flow series and nitrate concentration series, and (b) in both flow rate and concentration simulations to obtain nitrate load values. The data were collected at the Tuckahoe Creek watershed in Maryland, United States. The data-driven deep learning model was built using long-short-term-memory (LSTM) and three-dimensional convolutional networks (3D Convolutional Networks) to simulate flow rate and nitrate concentration using weather data and imagery to derive leaf area index according to land use. Models were calibrated with data over training period 2014-2017 and validated with data over testing period. SWAT Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) was 0.31 and 0.40 for flow rate and -0.26 and -0.18 for the nitrate load rate over training and testing periods, respectively. Three data-driven modeling scenarios were implemented: (1) using the observed flow rate and simulated nitrate concentration, (2) using the simulated flow rate and observed nitrate concentration, and (3) using the simulated flow rate and nitrate concentration. The deep learning model performed better than SWAT in all three scenarios with NSE from 0.49 to 0.58 for training and from 0.28 to 0.80 for testing periods with scenario 1 showing the best results. The difference in performance was most pronounced in fall and winter seasons. The deep learning modeling can be an efficient alternative to mechanistic watershed-scale water quality models provided the regular high-frequency data collection is implemented.

摘要

模拟水源中硝酸盐的归宿和运移是预测性水质管理的重要组成部分。目前,机理模型和数据驱动模型都在使用。机理模型,如SWAT,基于水流模拟结果来模拟每日硝酸盐负荷。数据驱动模型则允许独立模拟硝酸盐负荷和水流。当深度学习模型用于(a)流量序列和硝酸盐浓度序列的独立模拟,以及(b)流量和浓度模拟以获得硝酸盐负荷值时,对SWAT和深度学习模型的性能进行了评估。数据收集于美国马里兰州的塔卡霍溪流域。数据驱动的深度学习模型使用长短期记忆(LSTM)和三维卷积网络(3D Convolutional Networks)构建,利用气象数据和图像根据土地利用情况推导叶面积指数,以模拟流量和硝酸盐浓度。模型在2014 - 2017年训练期的数据上进行校准,并在测试期的数据上进行验证。SWAT在训练期和测试期的流量Nash - Sutcliffe效率(NSE)分别为0.31和0.40,硝酸盐负荷率的NSE分别为 - 0.26和 - 0.18。实施了三种数据驱动建模方案:(1)使用观测流量和模拟硝酸盐浓度,(2)使用模拟流量和观测硝酸盐浓度,(3)使用模拟流量和硝酸盐浓度。在所有三种方案中,深度学习模型的表现均优于SWAT,训练期的NSE为0.49至0.58,测试期为0.28至0.80,其中方案1显示出最佳结果。性能差异在秋季和冬季最为明显。如果实施定期的高频数据收集,深度学习建模可以成为机理流域尺度水质模型的有效替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验