Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Ecology. 2024 Nov;105(11):e4395. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4395. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
Plant resource allocation strategies are thought to be largely a consequence of changing abiotic conditions and evolutionary history. However, biotic interactions also influence how a plant allocates resources. As a result, plants mediate indirect interactions between organisms above- and belowground through resource allocation. Neighboring plants can influence plant fitness directly through competition for resources, and indirectly by altering associated community interactions (associational effects), such as pollination, herbivory, and a suite of belowground interactions. Given the importance of community interactions for plant success, and the known ability for plant neighbors to change these interactions, the goal of this "pandemic project" was to understand how heterospecific plant neighbors alter plant resource allocation, whether this occurred through above- or belowground mechanisms, and whether this in turn alters biotic interactions and the relationship between a focal plant and its herbivore and soil community interactions. To do so, we established a common garden experiment, manipulating plant neighbor identity and the extent of interaction among neighbors (aboveground only, vs. above- and belowground interactions, using customized pot types), and measured changes to a focal plant and its biotic interactions over two growing seasons. We found evidence of both neighbor effects and pot type, showing that neighbor interactions affect a focal plant through both above- and belowground processes, and how the focal plant is affected depends on neighbor identity. Though neighbors did not directly alter herbivory or most soil microbial interactions, they did alter the relationship between belowground microbial communities and a plant response trait (specific leaf area). Plant resource allocation responses were reduced with time, showing the importance of extending experiments beyond a single growing season, and are an important consideration when making predictions about plant responses to changing conditions. This study contributes to a growing body of work showing how community contexts affect the above- and belowground interactions of a plant through plant resource allocation strategies.
植物资源分配策略被认为主要是由不断变化的非生物条件和进化历史所决定的。然而,生物相互作用也会影响植物如何分配资源。因此,植物通过资源分配来调节地上和地下生物之间的间接相互作用。邻近的植物可以通过竞争资源直接影响植物的适应性,也可以通过改变相关的群落相互作用(关联效应),如传粉、取食和一系列地下相互作用,间接地影响植物的适应性。鉴于群落相互作用对植物成功的重要性,以及植物邻居改变这些相互作用的已知能力,这个“大流行项目”的目标是了解异源植物邻居如何改变植物的资源分配,无论是通过地上还是地下机制,以及这是否反过来又改变了生物相互作用以及一个焦点植物与其食草动物和土壤群落相互作用之间的关系。为此,我们建立了一个共同花园实验,操纵植物邻居的身份和邻居之间相互作用的程度(仅地上,或地上和地下相互作用,使用定制的花盆类型),并在两个生长季节测量一个焦点植物及其生物相互作用的变化。我们发现了邻居效应和花盆类型的证据,表明邻居相互作用通过地上和地下过程影响一个焦点植物,而焦点植物受到的影响取决于邻居的身份。虽然邻居没有直接改变取食或大多数土壤微生物相互作用,但它们确实改变了地下微生物群落与植物响应特征(比叶面积)之间的关系。植物资源分配的反应随着时间的推移而减少,这表明在一个生长季节之外延长实验的重要性,并且在对植物对变化条件的反应做出预测时是一个重要的考虑因素。这项研究有助于越来越多的工作表明,群落环境如何通过植物资源分配策略影响植物的地上和地下相互作用。