• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个将医院进行纵向关联的理论框架:以德国 2016-2020 年医院质量报告为例。

A theoretical framework for linking hospitals longitudinally: demonstrated using German Hospital Quality Reports 2016-2020.

机构信息

Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse 4, 35043, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02317-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02317-z
PMID:39300394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411731/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In longitudinal health services research, hospital identification using an ID code, often supplemented with several additional variables, lacks clarity regarding representativeness and variable influence. This study presents an operational method for hospital identity delimitation and a novel longitudinal identification approach, demonstrated using a case study.

METHODS

The conceptualisation considers hospitals as evolving entities, identifying "similar enough" pairs across two time points using an automated similarity matrix. This method comprises key variable selection, similarity scoring, and tolerance threshold definition, tailored to data source characteristics and clinical relevance. This linking method is tested by applying the identification of minimum caseload requirements-related German hospitals, utilizing German Hospital Quality Reports (GHQR) 2016-2020.

RESULTS

The method achieved a success rate (min: 97.9% - max: 100%, mean: 99.9%) surpassing traditional hospital ID-code linkage (min: 91.5% - max: 98.8%, mean: 96.6%), with a remarkable 99% reduction in manual work through automation.

CONCLUSIONS

This method, rooted in a comprehensive understanding of hospital identities, offers an operational, automated, and customisable process serving diverse clinical topics. This approach has the advantage of simultaneously considering multiple variables and systematically observing temporal changes in hospitals. It also enhances the precision and efficiency of longitudinal hospital identification in health services research.

摘要

背景

在纵向卫生服务研究中,使用 ID 码识别医院,通常辅以几个额外的变量,在代表性和变量影响方面缺乏明确性。本研究提出了一种用于医院身份界定的操作方法和一种新的纵向识别方法,并用案例研究进行了演示。

方法

概念化将医院视为不断发展的实体,使用自动相似度矩阵在两个时间点识别“足够相似”的对。这种方法包括关键变量选择、相似度评分和容差阈值定义,根据数据源特征和临床相关性进行定制。通过应用与最小病例量要求相关的德国医院识别方法来测试这种链接方法,利用德国医院质量报告(GHQR)2016-2020 年的数据。

结果

该方法的成功率(最小:97.9% - 最大:100%,平均:99.9%)超过了传统的医院 ID 码链接(最小:91.5% - 最大:98.8%,平均:96.6%),通过自动化大大减少了 99%的手动工作。

结论

这种方法基于对医院身份的全面理解,提供了一种可操作、自动化和可定制的过程,适用于各种临床主题。这种方法具有同时考虑多个变量和系统观察医院时间变化的优势。它还提高了卫生服务研究中纵向医院识别的精度和效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccc/11411731/f738fdc83ef8/12874_2024_2317_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccc/11411731/23f106771f4e/12874_2024_2317_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccc/11411731/f738fdc83ef8/12874_2024_2317_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccc/11411731/23f106771f4e/12874_2024_2317_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccc/11411731/f738fdc83ef8/12874_2024_2317_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A theoretical framework for linking hospitals longitudinally: demonstrated using German Hospital Quality Reports 2016-2020.一个将医院进行纵向关联的理论框架:以德国 2016-2020 年医院质量报告为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02317-z.
2
[Problems with Using Hospital Quality Reports as a Secondary Data Source for Health Services Research in Germany].[将医院质量报告用作德国卫生服务研究的二手数据源存在的问题]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Jul;79(7):542-547. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555953. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
Mandatory quality reports in Germany from the hospitals' point of view: a cross-sectional observational study.德国医院强制性质量报告:一项横断面观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 31;12:378. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-378.
4
Associations between hospital characteristics and patient satisfaction in Germany.德国医院特征与患者满意度的关联
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):593-600. doi: 10.1111/hex.12485. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
6
Influence of Hospital Volume Effects and Minimum Caseload Requirements on Quality of Care in Pancreatic Surgery in Germany.医院规模效应和最低病例数要求对德国胰腺手术护理质量的影响
Visc Med. 2017 May;33(2):131-134. doi: 10.1159/000456042. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Editor's Choice - Distribution of Care and Hospital Incidence of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Secondary Analysis of German Hospital Episode Data.编辑精选 - 颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的护理分布和医院发病率:德国医院病例数据的二次分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;62(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Comparison of Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates of Surgical Patients at Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals Using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and American Hospital Association Data.利用美国医疗保健研究与质量局和美国医院协会的数据比较安全网和非安全网医院手术患者的风险标准化再入院率。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):391-400. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5242.
9
Diagnostic diversity - an indicator of institutional and regional healthcare quality.诊断多样性——机构和地区医疗质量的一个指标。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Dec 15;148:w14691. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14691. eCollection 2018 Dec 3.
10
Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.德国公共报告网站是否提供了基层医生在将患者转诊至医院前所考虑的信息?一项四步分析。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the influence of medical staffing and birth volume on observed-to-expected cesarean deliveries: a panel data analysis of integrated obstetric and gynecological departments in Germany.探讨医疗人员配备和分娩量对观察到的与预期剖宫产率的影响:德国妇产科综合科室的面板数据分析
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01749-0.
2
Internal validation of self-reported case numbers in hospital quality reports: preparing secondary data for health services research.医院质量报告中自我报告病例数的内部验证:为卫生服务研究准备二手数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02429-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Data linkage in medical research.医学研究中的数据关联
BMJ Med. 2022 Mar 2;1(1):e000087. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000087. eCollection 2022.
2
Linkage of multiple electronic health record datasets using a 'spine linkage' approach compared with all 'pairwise linkages'.采用“脊柱链接”方法对多个电子健康记录数据集进行链接,与所有“两两链接”相比。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):214-226. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac130.
3
A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Data Linkage Publications on Diabetes in Australia.澳大利亚糖尿病数据关联文献的综合系统评价
Front Public Health. 2022 May 25;10:757987. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.757987. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessing the hospital volume-outcome relationship in surgery: a scoping review.评估手术中的医院量效关系:范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01396-6.
5
A guide to evaluating linkage quality for the analysis of linked data.用于分析关联数据的链接质量评估指南。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1699-1710. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx177.
6
[Continuity of hospital identifiers in hospital discharge data - Analysis of the nationwide German DRG Statistics from 2005 to 2013].[医院出院数据中医院标识符的连续性——对2005年至2013年德国全国疾病诊断相关分组统计数据的分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Nov;117:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
7
Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews.外科医生手术量与手术结果之间的关系:系统评价的系统综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;5(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4.
8
Longitudinal analysis of high-technology medical services and hospital financial performance.高科技医疗服务与医院财务绩效的纵向分析。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Jan/Mar;43(1):2-11. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000124.
9
[Minimum Caseload Requirements and In-hospital Mortality: Observational Study using Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data from 2006 to 2013].[最低病例数要求与院内死亡率:利用2006年至2013年全国医院出院数据的观察性研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Oct;79(10):823-834. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100731. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Longitudinal studies.纵向研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Nov;7(11):E537-40. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.63.