Pabon Maria A, Vaduganathan Muthiah, Claggett Brian L, Chatur Safia, Siqueira Sara, Marti-Castellote Pablo, de Boer Rudolf A, Hernandez Adrian F, Inzucchi Silvio E, Kosiborod Mikhail N, Lam Carolyn S P, Martinez Felipe, Shah Sanjiv J, Desai Akshay S, Jhund Pardeep S, McMurray John J V, Solomon Scott D, Vardeny Orly
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;26(12):2532-2540. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3410. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
Patients with heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) may face residual risks of clinical events that are comparable to those experienced by patients with HF whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has consistently been above 40%. However, little is known about the clinical course of patients with HFimpEF during hospitalization for HF.
DELIVER randomized patients with HF and LVEF >40% to dapagliflozin or placebo, including HFimpEF (LVEF previously ≤40%). We evaluated all HF hospitalizations adjudicated by the clinical endpoints committee with available data for determination of in-hospital course. Complicated hospitalization was defined as any hospitalization requiring intensive care unit stay, intravenous vasopressors/inotropes/vasodilators, invasive or non-invasive ventilation, mechanical fluid removal, ultrafiltration, or mechanical circulatory support. LVEF changes were extracted using a validated GPT-3.5, a large language model, via a secure private endpoint. Of the 6263 patients enrolled in DELIVER, 1151 (18%) had HFimpEF. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, there were 224 total HF hospitalizations in 144 patients with HFimpEF and 985 in 603 patients with LVEF consistently >40%. Patients with HFimpEF experienced higher rates of complicated HF hospitalization as compared with patients with LVEF consistently >40% (39% vs. 27%; p < 0.001). Among those who experienced a first HF hospitalization, there was no significant difference in length of stay or in-hospital mortality between patients with HFimpEF versus LVEF consistently >40%. In a subset of participants who had at least one LVEF measurement available during HF hospitalization, 66% of those with HFimpEF and 29% of patients with LVEF consistently >40% experienced a reduction in their LVEF to ≤40% from the time of enrolment (p < 0.001). In the entire DELIVER cohort, dapagliflozin reduced total uncomplicated and complicated HF hospitalizations, irrespective of HFimpEF status (p ≥0.30).
Among patients hospitalized for HF in DELIVER, those with HFimpEF experienced a more adverse in-hospital clinical course, necessitating higher resource utilization beyond standard diuretic therapy compared with patients with HF and LVEF consistently >40%, but had similar in-hospital mortality. Treatment benefits of dapagliflozin were not modified by hospitalization type.
射血分数改善的心力衰竭(HFimpEF)患者可能面临与左心室射血分数(LVEF)一直高于40%的HF患者相当的临床事件残余风险。然而,对于HFimpEF患者在因HF住院期间的临床病程知之甚少。
DELIVER研究将LVEF>40%的HF患者随机分为达格列净组或安慰剂组,其中包括HFimpEF患者(之前LVEF≤40%)。我们评估了临床终点委员会判定的所有HF住院病例,并利用可用数据确定住院病程。复杂住院被定义为任何需要入住重症监护病房、使用静脉血管升压药/正性肌力药/血管扩张剂、有创或无创通气、机械性液体清除、超滤或机械循环支持的住院病例。通过一个安全的专用端点,使用经过验证的GPT-3.5(一种大型语言模型)提取LVEF变化情况。在DELIVER研究纳入的6263例患者中,1151例(18%)为HFimpEF患者。在中位随访2.3年期间,144例HFimpEF患者共发生224次HF住院,603例LVEF一直>40%的患者共发生985次HF住院。与LVEF一直>40%的患者相比,HFimpEF患者发生复杂HF住院的比例更高(39%对27%;p<0.001)。在首次发生HF住院的患者中,HFimpEF患者与LVEF一直>40%的患者在住院时间或院内死亡率方面无显著差异。在HF住院期间至少有一次LVEF测量值的参与者亚组中,66%的HFimpEF患者和29%的LVEF一直>40%的患者自入组后LVEF降至≤40%(p<0.001)。在整个DELIVER队列中,无论HFimpEF状态如何,达格列净均降低了总的非复杂和复杂HF住院率(p≥0.30)。
在DELIVER研究中因HF住院的患者中,HFimpEF患者的院内临床病程更差,与LVEF一直>40%的HF患者相比,除标准利尿治疗外需要更高的资源利用,但院内死亡率相似。达格列净的治疗益处不受住院类型的影响。