Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Nov;26(11):5025-5035. doi: 10.1111/dom.15768. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
To identify unique clinical phenotypes in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and investigate their treatment response to canagliflozin using latent class analysis.
This was a pooled latent class analysis of the individuals in the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial. The co-primary endpoints were hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and the composite of cardiovascular death (CVD) or HHF. Secondary endpoints included three-point major adverse CV events, its individual components, and all-cause mortality. We completed Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of canagliflozin across phenotypes.
Four distinct phenotypes were identified: Phenotype 1 (n = 966, 6.6%), with the lowest prevalence of heart failure, kidney dysfunction and hypertension; Phenotype 2 (n = 4169, 28.7%), primarily comprising females with a high prevalence of atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD); Phenotype 3 (n = 7108, 48.9%), predominately males with a high prevalence of ASCVD; and Phenotype 4 (n = 2300, 15.8%), possessing the highest prevalences of HF and renal dysfunction. A hierarchical increase in the risk of the primary endpoint was observed across the phenotypes, with the highest CV risk observed for Phenotype 4 (hazard ratio for HHF: 7.57 [95% CI: 4.19-13.69]). Canagliflozin significantly reduced HHF and the composite CVD or HHF across phenotypes (all P values for interaction > .05).
We identified four clinically distinct T2D phenotypes with differential CV risks. Canagliflozin reduced the risk of CV events, irrespective of the phenotype, emphasizing its broad therapeutic acceptability.
确定 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的独特临床表型,并通过潜在类别分析研究其对卡格列净的治疗反应。
这是 CANVAS 计划和 CREDENCE 试验中个体的汇总潜在类别分析。主要联合终点是心力衰竭(HHF)住院和心血管死亡(CVD)或 HHF 的复合终点。次要终点包括三点主要不良心血管事件、其单个组成部分和全因死亡率。我们完成了 Cox 比例风险模型来评估卡格列净在各表型中的作用。
确定了四个不同的表型:表型 1(n=966,6.6%),心力衰竭、肾功能不全和高血压的患病率最低;表型 2(n=4169,28.7%),主要由女性组成,动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病(ASCVD)的患病率较高;表型 3(n=7108,48.9%),主要由男性组成,ASCVD 的患病率较高;表型 4(n=2300,15.8%),HF 和肾功能不全的患病率最高。主要终点的风险呈表型递增,表型 4 的 CV 风险最高(HHF 的危险比:7.57[95%CI:4.19-13.69])。卡格列净显著降低了各表型的 HHF 和 CVD 或 HHF 复合终点(所有交互 P 值>.05)。
我们确定了四种具有不同 CV 风险的临床显著 T2D 表型。卡格列净降低了 CV 事件的风险,无论表型如何,强调了其广泛的治疗可接受性。