Zemla Jeffrey C
Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2025 May;32(3):360-375. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2024.2405506. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
Reasoning can be fast, automatic, and intuitive or slow, deliberate, and analytical. Use of one cognitive reasoning style over the other has broad implications for beliefs, but differences in cognitive style have not previously been reported in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Here, the cognitive reflection test is used to measure cognitive style in healthy older adults and those with MCI. Those with MCI performed worse than cognitively healthy older adults, indicating they are more likely to engage in intuitive thinking than age-matched adults. This association is reliable after controlling for additional cognitive, self-report, and demographic factors. Across all measures, subjective cognitive decline was the best predictor of cognitive status. A difference in cognitive style represents a novel behavioral marker of MCI, and future work should explore whether this explains a broader pattern of reasoning errors in those with MCI, such as susceptibility to scams or impaired financial reasoning.
推理可以是快速、自动且直观的,也可以是缓慢、审慎且分析性的。相较于另一种认知推理方式,采用一种认知推理方式对信念具有广泛影响,但此前尚未有关于轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者认知风格差异的报道。在此,认知反思测试被用于测量健康老年人和MCI患者的认知风格。MCI患者的表现比认知健康的老年人更差,这表明他们比年龄匹配的成年人更倾向于进行直觉思维。在控制了其他认知、自我报告和人口统计学因素后,这种关联是可靠的。在所有测量指标中,主观认知衰退是认知状态的最佳预测指标。认知风格的差异代表了MCI的一种新的行为标志物,未来的研究应探索这是否能解释MCI患者更广泛的推理错误模式,例如易受骗或财务推理受损。