Yashar Amit, Carrasco Marisa
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Khoushy Ave, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):779-790. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02580-7. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
Crowding, our inability to identify a feature or object - the target - due to its proximity to adjacent features or objects - flankers - exhibits a notable inner-outer asymmetry. This asymmetry is characterized by the outer flanker - more peripheral - creating stronger interference than the inner one - closer to the fovea. But crowding is not uniform across different feature dimensions. For example, in the case of orientation, this asymmetry reflects misreport errors: observers are more likely to misidentify the outer flanker as the target than the inner one. However, for spatial frequency (SF), observers tend to average the features of the target and flankers (Yashar et al., 2019). Here, we investigated whether and how the inner-outer asymmetry manifests across various feature dimensions: Gabor orientation and SF, as well as T-shape tilt and color. We reanalyzed continuous estimation reports data published by Yashar et al. (2019), focusing on a previously unanalyzed factor: the relative position of each flanker (inner vs. outer). We fit probabilistic models that assign variable weights to each flanker. Our analysis revealed that observers predominantly misreport the outer flanker as the target with Gabor orientation and T-shape tilt stimuli, and slightly so with color stimuli, whereas with Gabor SF, observers perform a weighted average of all features but also with a bias towards the outer flanker over the inner one. These findings suggest that an increased weighting on the more peripheral items is a general characteristic of crowding in peripheral vision.
拥挤现象是指由于某个特征或物体(目标)与相邻特征或物体(侧翼干扰物)距离过近,导致我们无法识别该目标,这种现象呈现出显著的内外不对称性。这种不对称性的特点是,外侧侧翼干扰物(更靠近周边)比内侧侧翼干扰物(更靠近中央凹)产生更强的干扰。但是,拥挤现象在不同特征维度上并不一致。例如,在方向维度上,这种不对称性反映在错误报告误差上:观察者将外侧侧翼干扰物误认作目标的可能性比内侧侧翼干扰物更高。然而,对于空间频率(SF),观察者倾向于对目标和侧翼干扰物的特征进行平均处理(亚沙尔等人,2019年)。在此,我们研究了内外不对称性在各种特征维度上的表现方式:包括Gabor方向和SF,以及T形倾斜和颜色。我们重新分析了亚沙尔等人(2019年)发表的连续估计报告数据,重点关注一个此前未分析的因素:每个侧翼干扰物的相对位置(内侧与外侧)。我们拟合了为每个侧翼干扰物分配可变权重的概率模型。我们的分析表明,对于Gabor方向和T形倾斜刺激,观察者主要将外侧侧翼干扰物误认作目标,对于颜色刺激也有轻微误认,而对于Gabor SF,观察者对所有特征进行加权平均,但也存在偏向外侧侧翼干扰物而非内侧侧翼干扰物的偏差。这些发现表明,对更周边项目增加权重是周边视觉中拥挤现象的一个普遍特征。