• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的孤儿药和儿科医疗器械:支持其在标签内和标签外临床适应证使用的建议。

Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications.

机构信息

Department of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

IRDiRC Working Group on MedTech for Rare Diseases, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024 Oct;21(10):893-901. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2404257. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1080/17434440.2024.2404257
PMID:39302881
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Medical Device Regulation (EU)745/2017, increased the regulatory requirements and thus the time and the cost associated with marketing medical devices. For a majority of medical device manufacturers, this has lead to reconsiderations of their product portfolio. The risk of important or essential devices being withdrawn is particularly relevant for pediatric patients and other rare disease patients where limited numbers of devices can be sold and hence the investment needed may not be recovered. This generates critical challenges and opportunities from a regulatory and public health perspective.

AREAS COVERED

This paper is based upon the experience of the authors who contributed to working groups, guidance development and research related to orphan and pediatric devices. We examine the use of medical devices in orphan and pediatric conditions, the relevant aspects of regulations and associated guidance, and we suggest possible policy and practice interventions to ensure the continued availability of essential devices for children and people with rare diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

We recommend a more proactive approach to identifying devices at risk and essential devices, increasing the use of exceptional market approvals, expanding the role of expert panels, engaging with the rare disease communities and supporting registries and standards.

摘要

简介

《欧盟医疗器械法规》(EU)745/2017 提高了监管要求,因此与医疗器械营销相关的时间和成本也随之增加。对于大多数医疗器械制造商而言,这导致他们重新考虑其产品组合。对于儿科患者和其他罕见病患者而言,重要或基本设备被撤市的风险尤其相关,因为这些设备的销售量有限,因此所需的投资可能无法收回。这从监管和公共卫生的角度带来了重大挑战和机遇。

涵盖领域

本文基于作者的经验,他们为孤儿和儿科设备相关工作组、指导文件制定和研究做出了贡献。我们研究了医疗器械在孤儿和儿科疾病中的应用、法规和相关指导文件的相关方面,并提出了可能的政策和实践干预措施,以确保为儿童和罕见病患者继续提供基本设备。

专家意见

我们建议采取更积极的方法来识别有风险的设备和基本设备,增加特殊市场批准的使用,扩大专家小组的作用,与罕见病社区合作,并支持登记处和标准。

相似文献

1
Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications.欧洲的孤儿药和儿科医疗器械:支持其在标签内和标签外临床适应证使用的建议。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024 Oct;21(10):893-901. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2404257. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Encouraging research and development of pediatric medical devices through legislative and regulatory action: the Pediatric Medical Device Safety and Improvement Act of 2007 in context.通过立法和监管行动鼓励儿科医疗设备的研发:2007年《儿科医疗设备安全与改进法案》背景介绍
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(3):531-64.
3
Off-Label Use of Medical Devices in Children.儿童医疗设备的非标签使用。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3439.
4
Challenges and climate of business environment and resources to support pediatric device development.支持儿科设备开发的商业环境、资源面临的挑战及气候状况。
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jun;24(3):107-11. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
5
Improving medical device regulation: the United States and Europe in perspective.改进医疗器械监管:美国和欧洲的视角。
Milbank Q. 2014 Mar;92(1):114-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12043.
6
Quantification of US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Statements for High-Risk Medical Devices With Pediatric Age Indications.高风险医疗器械有儿科适应证的美国食品和药物管理局上市前批准声明的定量评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112562. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12562.
7
Medical device immunity: should promotion of off-label uses leave medical device manufacturers vulnerable to unlimited liability?医疗器械豁免:推广医疗器械的非标签使用是否会使制造商面临无限责任风险?
J Leg Med. 2014;35(4):553-77. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2014.981489.
8
Off-label use of medical products in radiation therapy: summary of the report of AAPM Task Group No. 121.医学产品在放射治疗中的标签外使用:AAPM 工作组第 121 号报告的总结。
Med Phys. 2010 May;37(5):2300-11. doi: 10.1118/1.3392286.
9
Orphan devices: yesterday is history; tomorrow is mystery: towards a European orphan device directive?孤儿器械:昨日已成历史;明日仍是未知:迈向欧洲孤儿器械指令?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Mar 3;11:22. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0393-3.
10
Pediatric Device Innovation: An Analysis of Food and Drug Administration Authorizations Over Time.儿科医疗器械创新:对食品和药物管理局授权的时间分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Sep 4;106(17):1594-1599. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01211. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Pediatric and congenital arrhythmia treatment : A complex interplay between expertise, re-imbursement, and industry].[小儿及先天性心律失常的治疗:专业知识、报销与行业之间的复杂相互作用]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00399-025-01099-1.
2
Survey of Notified Bodies reveals very limited use of conditional certification for high-risk medical devices.对公告机构的调查显示,高风险医疗器械的有条件认证使用非常有限。
Front Med Technol. 2025 Feb 3;7:1504294. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2025.1504294. eCollection 2025.