Shen Caijie, Bai Rong, Jia Zhenyu, Feng Mingjun, Yu Yibo, Du Xianfeng, Fu Guohua, Wu Tao, Jiang Yongxing, Jin He, Yu Lipu, Fang Renyuan, Zhuo Weidong, Dai Jiating, Gao Fang, Wang Binhao, Chen Si, Qiu Xinhui, Du Tingsha, Yu Xinzhi, Luo Chenxu, Lu Yiqi, Ouyang Feifan, Chu Huimin
Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
The University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ.
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jul;22(7):1682-1692. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.023. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
Data regarding the effects of pulsed field ablation (PFA) on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are limited.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the outcomes of PFA for AVNRT and its impact on dual-pathway electrophysiology.
A larger cohort of patients with typical AVNRT underwent slow pathway (SP) modification (SPM) using a focal PFA catheter in a biphasic/bipolar manner. The primary endpoints were the efficacy and safety of PFA during the procedure and at 6-month follow-up.
The acute success of SPM was achieved in all 40 patients. The total ablation time was 7.9 ± 3.8 seconds for 6.4 ± 2.2 ablation sites (ASs). Slow junctional rhythm (SJR) was induced in 32 (80%) patients, lasting 28.9 ± 10.3 seconds in 3.0 ± 1.1 ASs per patient. SP was located 11.1 ± 1.2 mm from the largest His activation (LHA). At 9 ASs, SJR could be reinduced after an increase of contact force (CF) from 1.3 ± 0.5g to 6.4 ± 1.3 g (P < .0001). Transient atrioventricular block (AVB) was recorded in 7 (17.5%) patients (1 second-degree and 6 third-degree AVB) lasting 435.3 ± 227.4 seconds, with a shorter AS-LHA distance than patients without AVB (7.7 ± 0.6 mm vs. 11.3 ± 1 mm; P < .0001). PFA-related delayed atrial-His (n = 6) and His-atrial (n = 1) conduction preceded transient AVB with a constant His-ventricular interval. Normal PR interval was restored within 24 hours. All patients maintained sinus rhythm without any significant adverse events during 6-month follow-up.
Despite the high efficiency of PFA for SPM, the notable incidence of transient AVB warranted caution when applying it near the His bundle. SJR frequently occurred during SPM and was dependent on moderate CF.
关于脉冲场消融(PFA)对房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)影响的数据有限。
本研究旨在评估PFA治疗AVNRT的疗效及其对双径路电生理的影响。
一大组典型AVNRT患者使用聚焦PFA导管以双相/双极方式进行慢径路改良(SPM)。主要终点是PFA在手术过程中及6个月随访时的疗效和安全性。
40例患者均成功完成SPM。6.4±2.2个消融位点(ASs)的总消融时间为7.9±3.8秒。32例(80%)患者诱发出缓慢交界性心律(SJR),每位患者在3.0±1.1个ASs中持续28.9±10.3秒。慢径位于距最大希氏束激动(LHA)11.1±1.2毫米处。在9个ASs处,当接触力(CF)从1.3±0.5克增加到6.4±1.3克时,可再次诱发出SJR(P<.0001)。7例(17.5%)患者记录到短暂房室传导阻滞(AVB)(1例二度和6例三度AVB),持续435.3±227.4秒,AS-LHA距离比无AVB的患者短(7.7±0.6毫米对11.3±1毫米;P<.0001)。PFA相关的延迟房-希氏(n = 6)和希氏-心房(n = 1)传导先于短暂AVB出现,希氏束-心室间期恒定。24小时内PR间期恢复正常。所有患者在6个月随访期间均维持窦性心律,无任何明显不良事件。
尽管PFA用于SPM效率高,但在希氏束附近应用时,短暂AVB的发生率较高,需谨慎使用。SJR在SPM期间频繁发生,且依赖于适度的CF。