In-vitro activities of essential antimicrobial agents including aztreonam/avibactam, eravacycline, colistin and other comparators against carbapenem-resistant bacteria with different carbapenemase genes: A multi-centre study in China, 2021.

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant bacteria (CRB), including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a considerable threat to public health in China. Eravacycline, aztreonam/avibactam and colistin are important antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by CRB. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CRB strains, and the susceptibility of commonly used clinical antimicrobial agents against strains with different carbapenemase genes.

METHODS

In total, 7194 gram-negative bacteria strains were collected from different regions of China, and 924 carbapenem-resistant strains were identified. All strains were from confirmed infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, covering 21 antimicrobial agents including aztreonam/avibactam, eravacycline, colistin and other comparators, was performed using the broth microdilution method. Carbapenemase genes (bla, bla, bla, bla and bla) were screened using polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequence analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 23.0.

RESULTS

The isolation rates of CRE, CRAB and CRPA were 6.31% (332/5265), 62.95% (440/699) and 15.20% (152/1000), respectively. The predominant carbapenemase in carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CRECO) was NDM, while in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), it was KPC. All CRAB produced OXA-23, and 85.52% of CRPA did not produce any of the following carbapenemases: NDM, KPC, VIM, IMP and OXA. Aztreonam/avibactam, colistin and eravacycline exhibited high antimicrobial activity against different species producing various carbapenemases. Compared with ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam demonstrated superior antimicrobial activity, particularly pronounced in CRECO and strains producing metallo-beta-lactamases. In comparisons between tigecycline and eravacycline, the latter maintained higher antimicrobial activity across different species. Antimicrobial agents exhibited varying levels of activity against strains with different resistance mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Using aztreonam/avibactam, eravacycline and colistin to treat infections caused by CRB offers significant advantages. These findings will guide clinical practice and optimize antimicrobial administration.