Krause Monika
Department of Sociology, London School of Economics, London, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2024 Sep 20. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13100.
This essay introduces contributions to a special section, which documents and extends a debate on the proposition "Social Science is Explanation or it is Nothing" held at the London School of Economics on October 13, 2022. It discusses the history of the "Group for Theoretical Debates in Anthropology" led by Tim Ingold, Peter Wade and Soumhya Venkatesan, which has handed down a list of credible candidates for issues that had a chance of engaging every anthropologist, including students and those with interdisciplinary interests. It raises questions about the specific affordances of debates as forms of academic engagements. It argues that the chosen proposition concerning explanation invites a discussion about the contributions of the social sciences at a time when impulses from science and technology studies as well as fruitful exchanges across the boundary between "theory" and "method" have helped us moved beyond the older question as to whether or not sociology is "a science".
本文介绍了一个专题部分的相关内容,该专题记录并拓展了2022年10月13日在伦敦经济学院举行的关于“社会科学若非解释则毫无意义”这一命题的辩论。它讨论了由蒂姆·英戈尔德、彼得·韦德和苏米亚·文卡特桑领导的“人类学理论辩论小组”的历史,该小组传承了一系列有可能吸引每一位人类学家(包括学生和具有跨学科兴趣的人)关注的可信议题清单。它提出了关于辩论作为学术参与形式的特定作用的问题。它认为,在科学技术研究的推动以及“理论”与“方法”之间富有成效的跨界交流帮助我们超越了社会学是否是“一门科学”这一旧问题之时,所选的关于解释的命题引发了一场关于社会科学贡献的讨论。