Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Dec;50(12):1879-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two contrast agents, SonoVue (SV) and Sonazoid (SZ), by comparing them intra-individually in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-CT/MRI fusion imaging (FI) to improve the visibility of inconspicuous liver malignancies on B-mode sonography for guiding percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Additionally, the radiologists' preference between SonoVue- CT/MRI FI (SV-FI) and Sonazoid-CT/MRI FI (SZ-FI) was determined.
This prospective study enrolled 23 patients with inconspicuous hepatic malignancies (≤ 3 cm) on B-mode US who underwent both SV-FI and SZ-FI for RFA guidance. The patients underwent real-time CEUS FI with CT/MRI on the same day, utilizing both SV and SZ with at least 15-min intervals. Tumor visibility and radiologists' preferences were assessed and graded using a 4-point scale during the dynamic phases of both SV-FI and SZ-FI and the Kupffer phase of SZ-FI.
The tumor visibility scores obtained from CEUS-CT/MRI FI were significantly better than those obtained from US-FI. Indeed, SV-FI and SZ-FI demonstrated comparable visibility scores when corresponding phases were compared (p > 0.05). However, the Kupffer phase images of SZ-FI displayed superior visibility scores (3.70 ± 0.56 vs. 2.96 ± 0.88; p = 0.002) than the late vascular phase images of SV-FI. The radiologists favored SZ-FI in many cases, exhibiting moderate inter-observer agreement (Kappa value = 0.587; 95% CI, 0.403-0.772).
Although CEUS-CT/MRI FI with either SV or SZ substantially improved the visibility of inconspicuous tumors on US-CT/MRI FI, radiologists preferred SZ to SV to guide the RFA procedure.
本研究旨在通过对比 SonoVue(SV)和 Sonazoid(SZ)两种对比剂,评估其在对比增强超声(CEUS)-CT/MRI 融合成像(FI)中的效果,以提高在 B 模式超声上不明显的肝脏恶性肿瘤的可视性,从而指导经皮射频消融(RFA)。此外,还确定了放射科医生对 SonoVue-CT/MRI FI(SV-FI)和 Sonazoid-CT/MRI FI(SZ-FI)的偏好。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了 23 例 B 模式超声上不明显的肝脏恶性肿瘤(≤3cm)患者,他们均接受了 SV-FI 和 SZ-FI 以指导 RFA。患者在同一天接受了实时 CEUS FI 与 CT/MRI,两种造影剂的注射时间间隔至少为 15 分钟。在 SV-FI 和 SZ-FI 的动态期以及 SZ-FI 的 Kupffer 期,使用 4 分制评估肿瘤的可视性,并对放射科医生的偏好进行评分。
CEUS-CT/MRI FI 的肿瘤可视性评分明显优于 US-FI。事实上,当比较相应的时相时,SV-FI 和 SZ-FI 的可视性评分相当(p>0.05)。然而,SZ-FI 的 Kupffer 期图像的可视性评分(3.70±0.56)优于 SV-FI 的晚期血管期图像(2.96±0.88)(p=0.002)。在许多情况下,放射科医生更喜欢 SZ-FI,观察者间的一致性为中度(Kappa 值=0.587;95%CI,0.403-0.772)。
尽管在 US-CT/MRI FI 上,CEUS-CT/MRI FI 联合使用 SV 或 SZ 都显著提高了不明显肿瘤的可视性,但放射科医生还是更倾向于使用 SZ 来指导 RFA 手术。