Tianjin Engineering Center of Urban River Eco-purification Technology School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China.
Tianjin Engineering Center of Urban River Eco-purification Technology School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Dec 5;480:135919. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135919. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
By integrating probabilistic ecological risk assessment with the overall risk index method, which considers the multidimensional characteristics of the microplastome, the ecological risks of microplastic pollution were assessed more comprehensively. This study took the Baiyangdian Basin as an example to address the limitations of current risk assessment methods that rely on concentration data or the individual risk of microplastics. Using an exponential regression model, the acute and chronic ecological risk thresholds for the overall risk index method were determined to be 0.43 and 0.30, respectively. The acute and chronic ecological risks of the microplastome occupied 61 % and 79 % of the Baiyangdian Wetland and 0 % and 14 % of the Fu River, while the Xiaoyi River did not exhibit risk during the rainy season. Results indicated that intense human activities, poor hydrodynamics, low settling velocity and high levels of environmental chemical pollutants jointly contributed to the high risk of the microplastome in water bodies. Compared with the probabilistic ecological risk assessment method (risk characterization ratio), there was a significant difference in the area of acute and chronic ecological risks caused by the microplastome in the Baiyangdian Basin when using the overall risk index method. This proved that considering only concentration cannot truly reflect the toxicity of microplastics to aquatic organisms.
通过将概率生态风险评估与综合风险指数方法相结合,综合考虑微塑料的多维特征,更全面地评估了微塑料污染的生态风险。本研究以白洋淀流域为例,解决了当前风险评估方法依赖于浓度数据或微塑料个体风险的局限性。利用指数回归模型,确定了综合风险指数方法的急性和慢性生态风险阈值分别为 0.43 和 0.30。微塑料的急性和慢性生态风险分别占据了白洋淀湿地的 61%和 79%,以及府河的 0%和 14%,而孝义河在雨季则没有表现出风险。结果表明,人类活动强烈、水动力条件差、沉降速度低以及环境化学污染物水平高,共同导致了水体中微塑料的高风险。与概率生态风险评估方法(风险特征比值)相比,在使用综合风险指数方法时,白洋淀流域微塑料引起的急性和慢性生态风险的区域存在显著差异。这证明了仅考虑浓度并不能真实反映微塑料对水生生物的毒性。