• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常生活灵活性量表的开发,用于测量健康与疾病状态下的多维认知和行为灵活性。

Development of the Flexibility in Daily Life scale to measure multidimensional cognitive and behavioural flexibility in health and disease.

作者信息

Horne Kristina, Chen Tao, Irish Muireann

机构信息

Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):315-329. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12505. Epub 2024 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1111/bjc.12505
PMID:39308144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12057328/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Inflexibility of thought and behaviour is a transdiagnostic feature of many neuropsychiatric disorders and presents several empirical measurement challenges. Here, we developed and validated the Flexibility in Daily Life scale (FIDL); a novel, self-report questionnaire, which captures expressions of cognitive and behavioural flexibility in daily life and is sensitive to natural shifts in these processes across the adult lifespan.

METHODS

The FIDL was developed using a deductive scale development approach, which aimed to capture common themes within the flexibility literature and across diagnoses (e.g. insistence on sameness, preference for routines). Following multidisciplinary consensus, an initial 37-item questionnaire was submitted for validation in an online sample of 295 healthy adult participants (19-78 years).

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis produced a revised 21-item version comprising five factors, labelled: Repetition, Switching, Predictability/Control, Routine, and Thoughts/Beliefs. Internal consistency reliability was good-to-strong for the total FIDL score and moderate-to-strong for individual subscales. Convergent validity was established between the FIDL and an existing measure of cognitive flexibility. Critically, the FIDL total score evinced a U-shaped relationship with age, whereby flexibility was lower at the younger and older tails of the lifespan and greater in middle age. The same U-shaped trajectory emerged for the Repetition, Routine, and Thoughts/Beliefs factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the FIDL is a valid and reliable multidimensional measure of flexibility, which upholds a clearly defined factor structure and good psychometric properties. It promises to be a valuable clinical and research tool to assess the natural fluctuations in flexibility across the lifespan and departures thereof.

摘要

目标

思维和行为的僵化是许多神经精神疾病的一种跨诊断特征,并且带来了若干实证测量方面的挑战。在此,我们开发并验证了日常生活灵活性量表(FIDL);这是一种新颖的自我报告问卷,它能够捕捉日常生活中认知和行为灵活性的表现,并且对这些过程在成年期的自然变化敏感。

方法

FIDL采用演绎量表开发方法进行开发,旨在捕捉灵活性文献以及不同诊断中的共同主题(例如坚持相同、偏好常规)。经过多学科共识后,一份初始的37个条目的问卷在295名健康成年参与者(19 - 78岁)的在线样本中进行验证。

结果

探索性因素分析产生了一个修订后的21个条目的版本,包含五个因素,分别标记为:重复、转换、可预测性/控制、常规以及思维/信念。FIDL总分的内部一致性信度良好到较强,各个子量表的内部一致性信度中等至较强。FIDL与现有的认知灵活性测量工具之间建立了收敛效度。关键的是,FIDL总分与年龄呈现出U形关系,即灵活性在成年期的两端较低,在中年时较高。重复、常规和思维/信念因素也出现了相同的U形轨迹。

结论

总体而言,FIDL是一种有效且可靠的灵活性多维测量工具,它具有明确界定的因素结构和良好的心理测量特性。它有望成为评估一生中灵活性的自然波动及其偏离情况的有价值的临床和研究工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/c220cb627f95/BJC-64-315-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/4178eada650e/BJC-64-315-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/f3ce685f8a95/BJC-64-315-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/c220cb627f95/BJC-64-315-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/4178eada650e/BJC-64-315-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/f3ce685f8a95/BJC-64-315-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d160/12057328/c220cb627f95/BJC-64-315-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Flexibility in Daily Life scale to measure multidimensional cognitive and behavioural flexibility in health and disease.日常生活灵活性量表的开发,用于测量健康与疾病状态下的多维认知和行为灵活性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):315-329. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12505. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
2
A psychometric examination of the cognitive flexibility scale and its association with Orthorexia Nervosa.认知灵活性量表的心理测量学检验及其与正食癖的关联。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 4;12(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02179-6.
3
Rigidity in routines and the development of resistance to change in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome.普拉德-威利综合征患者日常行为的刻板性及对改变的抗拒性发展
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 May;61(5):488-500. doi: 10.1111/jir.12368. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
Exploratory Factor Analysis and Convergent Validity of the Adult Executive Function Inventory (ADEXI).成人执行功能测验(ADEXI)的探索性因素分析和聚合效度。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Nov 1;78(6). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050686.
5
Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of cognitive flexibility.两种认知灵活性自我报告测量方法的信度和效度
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1381-1387. doi: 10.1037/a0038009. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
6
Measuring flexibility in autistic adults: Exploring the factor structure of the flexibility scale self report.测量自闭症成年人的灵活性:探索灵活性量表自我报告的因子结构。
Autism Res. 2023 Nov;16(11):2208-2219. doi: 10.1002/aur.3025. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].[元认知的心理测量方法:临床人群的初步研究]
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
Subjective cognitive rigidity and attention to detail: A cross-cultural validation of the Detail and Flexibility Questionnaire (DFlex) in a French clinical sample.主观认知僵化与关注细节:DFlex 问卷在法国临床样本中的跨文化验证
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Dec;42(10):1059-1071. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1842333. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
9
Measuring subjective complaints of attention and performance failures--development and psychometric validation in tinnitus of the self-assessment scale APSA.测量注意力和表现失败的主观抱怨——自我评估量表 APSA 在耳鸣中的开发和心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 May 29;11:86. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-86.
10
Style preference survey: a report on the psychometric properties and a cross-validation experiment.风格偏好调查:关于心理测量特性的报告及交叉验证实验
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):89-104. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in frontotemporal dementia.额颞叶痴呆的性别差异。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41582-025-01124-4.
2
Self-efficacy scale for university teaching in virtual environments, SSUTVE.虚拟环境下大学教学自我效能感量表(SSUTVE)
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 11;11(1):e41134. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41134. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing the link between motivational disturbances and behavioural rigidity in frontotemporal dementia.建立额颞叶痴呆中动机障碍与行为刻板之间的联系。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Feb;31(2):e16132. doi: 10.1111/ene.16132. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
The effect of age on task switching: updated and extended meta-analyses.年龄对任务转换的影响:更新和扩展的元分析。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2011-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01794-z. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
Dimensional Assessment of Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors: Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure.
受限及重复行为的维度评估:新测量工具的制定与初步验证。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 May;62(5):568-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.863. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
Evaluating CloudResearch's Approved Group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk.评估 CloudResearch 的已批准小组作为解决 MTurk 上数据质量问题的方案。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):3953-3964. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01999-x. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
From exploration to exploitation: a shifting mental mode in late life development.从探索到开发:晚年发展中思维模式的转变。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Dec;25(12):1058-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Brain Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Flexibility Across the Lifespan.贯穿生命全程的认知灵活性的大脑动力学基础。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Oct 1;31(11):5263-5274. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab156.
7
Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical considerations.认知和行为灵活性:神经机制与临床考量。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Mar;22(3):167-179. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00428-w. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Progressive dysexecutive syndrome due to Alzheimer's disease: a description of 55 cases and comparison to other phenotypes.阿尔茨海默病所致进行性执行功能障碍综合征:55例病例描述及与其他表型的比较
Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcaa068. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa068. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?为什么自陈式测量和行为测量相关性较弱?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):267-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
10
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.