• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将 CAPs 的最佳实践应用于社区-学术-矫正伙伴关系:学术伙伴视角。

Applying Best Practices from CAPs to a Community-Academic-Corrections Partnership: Academic Partner Perspectives.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(3):437-445.

PMID:39308388
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While correctional systems often function separately from academic and community-based organizations, there is opportunity for mutually beneficial collaborative partnerships to strengthen services and relationships. Community-academic partnerships (CAPs) are a well-established model in implementation science and in scientific literature. Applying best practices for CAPs to a partnership that includes community, academic, and correctional partners could contribute to a stronger partnership with more capacity to improve population health of people who experience incarceration.

OBJECTIVES

To describe our work to identify CAP best practices, and to discuss considerations and approaches for applying these best practices in an emerging community- academic-corrections partnership.

METHODS

From the scientific literature, we identified best practices for CAPs across nine domains: bringing the community into the project; building new relationships while addressing the past; establishing mutually beneficial vision, goals, and purpose; roles and expectations of partners; communication; administration; leadership; project implementation and evaluation; and building community capacity and awareness. In this paper we describe considerations from the perspective of the academic partner regarding these nine best practice domains in the development of a community-academic-corrections partnership.

CONCLUSIONS

While established CAP best practices have relevance, there are specific considerations for partnerships with correctional authorities that require attention. Informed by best practices, planning and preparation for partnership can help mitigate challenges, support effectiveness, and strengthen relationships.

摘要

背景

虽然惩教系统通常与学术和社区组织分开运作,但仍有机会建立互利的合作关系,以加强服务和关系。社区-学术伙伴关系(CAP)是实施科学和科学文献中的一个成熟模式。将 CAP 的最佳实践应用于包括社区、学术和惩教合作伙伴的伙伴关系,可以为更强有力的伙伴关系做出贡献,从而提高被监禁者的人口健康水平。

目的

描述我们确定 CAP 最佳实践的工作,并讨论在新兴的社区-学术-惩教伙伴关系中应用这些最佳实践的注意事项和方法。

方法

我们从科学文献中确定了 CAP 在九个领域的最佳实践:将社区纳入项目;在解决过去问题的同时建立新的关系;建立互利的愿景、目标和宗旨;合作伙伴的角色和期望;沟通;管理;领导;项目实施和评估;以及建立社区能力和意识。在本文中,我们从学术合作伙伴的角度描述了这些九个最佳实践领域在社区-学术-惩教伙伴关系发展中的考虑因素。

结论

虽然已经确立的 CAP 最佳实践具有相关性,但与惩教当局建立伙伴关系需要特别注意。在最佳实践的指导下,对伙伴关系进行规划和准备,可以帮助减轻挑战,提高效率,并加强关系。

相似文献

1
Applying Best Practices from CAPs to a Community-Academic-Corrections Partnership: Academic Partner Perspectives.将 CAPs 的最佳实践应用于社区-学术-矫正伙伴关系:学术伙伴视角。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(3):437-445.
2
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.社区-学术伙伴关系:文献现状的系统综述及对未来研究的建议
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12184.
3
Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations.与学术研究人员建立合作关系的实用技巧:社区组织资源指南。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):203-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042.
4
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系:癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
5
Guidance for Genuine Collaboration: Insights from Academic, Tribal, and Community Partner Interviews on a New Research Partnership.关于真正合作的指导:从学术、部落和社区合作伙伴访谈中获得的新研究伙伴关系的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 16;16(24):5132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245132.
6
Growing partners: building a community-academic partnership to address health disparities in rural North Carolina.不断发展的合作伙伴:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系以解决北卡罗来纳州农村地区的健康差异问题。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Summer;8(2):181-6. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0021.
7
Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research.社区能力建设与可持续性:基于社区的参与性研究成果
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):349-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0048.
8
Advancing Community-Engaged Research through Partnership Development: Overcoming Challenges Voiced by Community-Academic Partners.通过伙伴关系发展推进社区参与式研究:克服社区-学术伙伴提出的挑战。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):315-326. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0037.
9
Participatory evaluation of a community-academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability.社区-学术伙伴关系的参与式评估,以指导能力建设和可持续性发展。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Opening the Black Box: Conceptualizing Community Engagement From 109 Community-Academic Partnership Programs.打开黑匣子:从109个社区-学术合作项目中构建社区参与的概念
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Spring;10(1):51-61. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0019.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuing the conversation: practical strategies to enable acceptable and feasible health research in prisons.继续探讨:在监狱中开展可接受且可行的健康研究的实用策略。
Arch Public Health. 2025 May 28;83(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01619-y.