J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Jul 1;112(3):281-285. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1919. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
There is a 17-year gap between the publication of research which proves an intervention is efficacious and effective and the implementation of that same intervention into practice [1]. In behavioral health, only 14% of successful interventions are integrated into actual practice [2]. As such, Implementation Science is envisioned to address the research to practice gap. This research methodology becomes important as it looks to investigate how to get interventions to become embedded in practice and de-implement unproven or disproven interventions that may be harmful and/or ineffective for patients. The aim of this commentary is to raise awareness of health sciences librarians/information specialists about this research arena and encourage health sciences librarians to envision how they could be involved in implementation science projects and teams or even use implementation science in their practice.
研究证明某项干预措施有效和有益,到将该干预措施实际应用于实践之间存在着 17 年的差距[1]。在行为健康领域,只有 14%的成功干预措施被纳入实际实践中[2]。因此,实施科学旨在解决研究与实践之间的差距。这种研究方法变得很重要,因为它旨在研究如何使干预措施融入实践,并取消实施未经证实或已证明无效的干预措施,这些干预措施可能对患者有害和/或无效。本文的目的是使卫生科学图书馆员/信息专家意识到这一研究领域,并鼓励卫生科学图书馆员设想他们如何参与实施科学项目和团队,甚至在实践中使用实施科学。