Stimolo Davide, Leggieri Filippo, Matassi Fabrizio, Barra Angelo, Civinini Roberto, Innocenti Matteo
Department of Orthopaedics, AOU Careggi Florence, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence, School of Human Health Sciences, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Jul 3;9(3):123-131. doi: 10.1515/iss-2024-0007. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Three-dimensional (3D) planning and Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) can help the surgeon to obtain more predictable results in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (mOW-HTO) than the conventional techniques. We compared the accuracy of the PSI and standard techniques and measured the learning curve for surgery time and number of fluoroscopic shots.
We included the first 12 consecutive cases of mOW-HTO performed with 3D planning and PSI cutting guides and the first 12 non-supervised mOW-HTO performed with the standard technique. We recorded surgery time and fluoroscopic time. We calculated the variation (Δ delta) between the planned target and the postoperative result for Hip Knee Ankle Angle (HKA), mechanical medial Proximal Tibia Angle (MPTA), Joint Line Convergence Angle (JLCA) and tibial slope (TS) and compared it both groups. We also recorded the complication rate. We then calculated the learning curves for surgery time, number of fluoroscopic shots, Δ from target in both groups. CUSUM analysis charts for learning curves were applied between the two groups.
Mean surgical time and mean number of fluoroscopic shots were lower in PSI group (48.58±7.87 vs. 58.75±6.86 min; p=0.034 and 10.75±3.93 vs. 18.16±4.93 shots; p<0.001). The postoperative ΔHKA was 0.42±0.51° in PSI vs. 1.25±0.87° in conventional, p=0.005. ΔMPTA was 0.50±0.67° in PSI vs. 3.75±1.48° in conventional, p<0.001; ΔTS was 1.00±0.82° in PSI vs. 3.50±1.57° in conventional, p<0.001. ΔJLCA was 1.83±1.11° in PSI vs. 4±1.41° in conventional, p<0.001. The CUSUM analysis favoured PSI group regarding surgery time (p=0.034) and number of shots (p<0.001) with no learning curve effect for ΔHKA, ΔMPTA, ΔJLCA and ΔTS.
PSI cutting guides and 3D planning for HTO are effective in reducing the learning curves for operation time and number of fluoroscopic shots. Accuracy of the procedure has been elevated since the first cases.
与传统技术相比,三维(3D)规划和患者特异性器械(PSI)可帮助外科医生在内侧开口楔形高位胫骨截骨术(mOW-HTO)中获得更可预测的结果。我们比较了PSI和标准技术的准确性,并测量了手术时间和透视次数的学习曲线。
我们纳入了连续12例使用3D规划和PSI切割导板进行的mOW-HTO手术,以及连续12例采用标准技术进行的非监督mOW-HTO手术。我们记录了手术时间和透视时间。我们计算了计划目标与术后髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角(HKA)、机械性内侧胫骨近端角(MPTA)、关节线汇聚角(JLCA)和胫骨斜率(TS)结果之间的差异(Δ),并在两组之间进行比较。我们还记录了并发症发生率。然后,我们计算了两组手术时间、透视次数、与目标的Δ的学习曲线。应用两组之间学习曲线的累积和(CUSUM)分析图。
PSI组的平均手术时间和平均透视次数较低(48.58±7.87 vs. 58.75±6.86分钟;p=0.034,以及10.75±3.93 vs. 18.16±4.93次;p<0.001)。PSI组术后ΔHKA为0.42±0.51°,传统组为1.25±0.87°,p=0.005。PSI组的ΔMPTA为0.50±0.67°,传统组为3.75±1.48°,p<0.001;PSI组的ΔTS为1.00±0.82°,传统组为3.50±1.57°,p<0.001。PSI组的ΔJLCA为1.83±1.11°,传统组为4±1.41°,p<0.001。CUSUM分析显示,在手术时间(p=0.034)和透视次数(p<0.001)方面,PSI组更具优势,而对于ΔHKA、ΔMPTA、ΔJLCA和ΔTS没有学习曲线效应。
PSI切割导板和HTO的3D规划可有效减少手术时间和透视次数的学习曲线。自首例病例以来,该手术的准确性得到了提高。