A rhesus macaque intragastric challenge model for evaluating the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of live-attenuated 1 vaccine candidates.

Shigellosis remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in Asia and Africa, where it is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among children. Despite the urgent need, the development of a licensed vaccine has been hindered, partly due to the lack of suitable animal models for preclinical evaluation. In this study, we used an intragastric adult rhesus macaque challenge model to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of five live-attenuated 1 vaccine candidates, all derived from the 1617 parent strain. The vaccine strains included WRSd1, a previously tested candidate with deletions in virG(icsA), stxAB, and fnr, and four other strains-WRSd2, WRSd3, WRSd4, and WRSd5-each containing deletions in virG and stxAB, but retaining fnr. Additionally, WRSd3 and WRSd5 had further deletions in the enterotoxin gene senA and its paralog senB, with WRSd5 having an extra deletion in msbB2. Rhesus monkeys were immunized three times at two-day intervals with a target dose of 2 × 10 CFU of the vaccine strains. Thirty days after the final immunization, all monkeys were challenged with a target dose of 2 × 10 CFU of the 1 1617 wild-type strain. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy were assessed through physical monitoring and the evaluation of immunologic and inflammatory markers following immunization and challenge. Initial doses of WRSd1, WRSd3, and WRSd5 led to mild adverse effects, such as vomiting and loose stools, but all five vaccine strains were well tolerated in subsequent doses. All strains elicited significant IgA and IgG antibody responses, as well as the production of antibody-secreting cells. Notably, none of the vaccinated animals exhibited shigellosis symptoms such as vomiting or loose/watery stool post-challenge, in stark contrast to the control group, where 39% and 61% of monkeys exhibited these symptoms, respectively. The aggregate clinical score used to evaluate attack rates post-challenge revealed a 72% attack rate in control animals, compared to only 13% in vaccinated animals, indicating a relative risk reduction of 81%. This study highlights the potential of this NHP model in evaluating the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of live-attenuated vaccine candidates, offering a valuable tool for preclinical assessment before advancing to Phase 1 or more advanced clinical trials.