Tregear Michelle, Visco Fran
National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC, USA.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 11;76:102833. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102833. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Oncologists and cancer patients generally agree that the primary goals of advanced cancer treatment are to lengthen and/or improve patient survival. Yet over the last two decades, clinical trials of new cancer treatments have moved away from measuring outcomes that matter to patients. Increasingly, new drugs for advanced cancer treatment reach the market by demonstrating improvements in surrogate endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS), which is not a measure of how a patient feels, functions, or survives. Research has shown that when patients are fully informed about the meaning of PFS, about half would not choose additional treatment for any magnitude of gain in PFS in the absence of an overall survival improvement. It's time to get back to designing trials that answer clinically meaningful questions and measure the outcomes that truly matter to patients. Engaging educated patient advocates in meaningful ways in clinical trial design and reporting would be a step in this direction.
肿瘤学家和癌症患者普遍认为,晚期癌症治疗的主要目标是延长患者生存期和/或提高患者的生存质量。然而在过去二十年里,新癌症治疗方法的临床试验已不再侧重于衡量对患者至关重要的结果。越来越多的晚期癌症治疗新药通过证明在无进展生存期(PFS)等替代终点指标上有所改善而进入市场,而PFS并非衡量患者感受、功能或生存情况的指标。研究表明,当患者充分了解PFS的含义时,在总生存期没有改善的情况下,大约一半的患者不会因PFS有任何程度的提高而选择接受额外治疗。现在是时候回归到设计能够回答具有临床意义的问题并衡量对患者真正重要的结果的试验了。让受过教育的患者权益倡导者以有意义的方式参与临床试验设计和报告将是朝着这个方向迈出的一步。