• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于SHIR和SLPR传播模型的社交网络影响

Social network influence based on SHIR and SLPR propagation models.

作者信息

Liu Xingyi

机构信息

School of Photography, Communication University of China Nanjing, Nanjing, 210000, PR China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(18):e36658. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36658. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36658
PMID:39309818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11415715/
Abstract

The rapid progress of science and technology has revolutionized the dissemination of information, with the Internet playing a crucial role. While it has enhanced the ease of sharing information, it has also hastened the transmission of emotions on social media, sometimes resulting in unintended negative outcomes. This research seeks to tackle this issue by suggesting an innovative technique for analyzing social network influence using the Susceptible Hesitant Infected Removed (SHIR) and Susceptible Latent Propagative Removal (SLPR) propagation models. Through the development of an emotional communication model, we take into account the effects of news and public opinion on the rate of emotional communication among individuals. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of various network structures on user behavior. The findings from experiments demonstrate a notable relationship between changes in the density of emotion spreaders and hesitants and the influence of nodes in different network configurations. Specifically, the analysis reveals that the peaks of hesitators and disseminators were lower when the node influence was reduced. Additionally, we verified the precision and dependability of our model by examining data from the Baidu Index, a tool for big data analysis. The margin of error between the model and the actual data was minimal, underscoring the efficacy of our approach. In essence, the study highlights a direct correlation between the speed and extent of emotional propagation in social networks and the degree of nodes. The results showed that the density changes of emotion spreaders and hesitants were significantly correlated with the influence of nodes in different network settings. In the case of node influence of 0.86, the highest peaks of hesitator H and disseminator I were 0.101 and 0.109 lower than those of influence of 1.25. The data analysis of the Baidu Index showed that the maximum peak error of the model was only 0.04, which verified the accuracy and reliability of the model. This investigation carries significant implications for efficiently managing and steering the dissemination of emotions on social media, thereby promoting a healthier online environment.

摘要

科学技术的飞速发展彻底改变了信息传播方式,互联网在其中发挥了关键作用。虽然它提高了信息共享的便利性,但也加速了社交媒体上情绪的传播,有时会导致意想不到的负面结果。本研究旨在通过提出一种创新技术来解决这一问题,该技术利用易感犹豫感染移除(SHIR)和易感潜伏传播移除(SLPR)传播模型分析社交网络影响。通过开发情感传播模型,我们考虑了新闻和公众舆论对个体间情感传播速度的影响。此外,我们还研究了各种网络结构对用户行为的影响。实验结果表明,情绪传播者和犹豫者密度的变化与不同网络配置中节点的影响之间存在显著关系。具体而言,分析表明,当节点影响力降低时,犹豫者和传播者的峰值较低。此外,我们通过分析百度指数(一种大数据分析工具)的数据,验证了模型的准确性和可靠性。模型与实际数据之间的误差幅度极小,突出了我们方法的有效性。本质上,该研究强调了社交网络中情绪传播的速度和程度与节点程度之间的直接相关性。结果表明,情绪传播者和犹豫者的密度变化与不同网络环境中节点的影响显著相关。在节点影响力为0.86的情况下,犹豫者H和传播者I的最高峰分别比影响力为1.25时低0.101和0.109。百度指数的数据分析表明,模型的最大峰值误差仅为0.04,验证了模型的准确性和可靠性。这项调查对于有效管理和引导社交媒体上的情绪传播具有重要意义,从而促进更健康的网络环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/d9b9d1caf115/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/fd334d649e01/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/8c0ac5518162/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/b5f618f3ec04/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/501ea7b32c10/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/a2f336e09811/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/329f5a63b63d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/d9d78bc263d3/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/e16cd9f7f0f7/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/623df986e433/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/14c0347e2caa/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/f035d0a2c6bd/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/d9b9d1caf115/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/fd334d649e01/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/8c0ac5518162/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/b5f618f3ec04/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/501ea7b32c10/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/a2f336e09811/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/329f5a63b63d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/d9d78bc263d3/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/e16cd9f7f0f7/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/623df986e433/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/14c0347e2caa/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/f035d0a2c6bd/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2204/11415715/d9b9d1caf115/gr12.jpg

相似文献

1
Social network influence based on SHIR and SLPR propagation models.基于SHIR和SLPR传播模型的社交网络影响
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(18):e36658. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36658. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
2
Modeling Network Public Opinion Propagation with the Consideration of Individual Emotions.考虑个体情绪的网络舆情传播建模。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186681.
3
The impact and management of internet-based public opinion dissemination during emergencies: A case study of Baidu News during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).突发事件中基于互联网的舆情传播的影响与管理:以新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情第一波期间百度新闻为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0299374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299374. eCollection 2024.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Topic-Emotion Propagation Mechanism of Public Emergencies in Social Networks.主题-社交网络中公共突发事件的情感传播机制。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;21(13):4516. doi: 10.3390/s21134516.
6
The Impact of Social Media on Risk Communication of Disasters-A Comparative Study Based on Weibo Blogs Related to Tianjin Explosion and Typhoon Pigeon.社交媒体对灾害风险沟通的影响——基于微博博客的比较研究,以天津爆炸和台风“天鸽”为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030883.
7
Tobacco control challenges in China: Big data analysis of online tobacco marketing information.中国的烟草控制挑战:在线烟草营销信息的大数据分析
Int J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jul 4;7(Suppl 1):S52-S60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.07.002. eCollection 2020 Sep 10.
8
Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention.减轻社交媒体中信息特征对健康错误信息分享意愿的影响:准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117136. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117136. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
9
A multiple information model incorporating limited attention and information environment.一个包含有限注意力和信息环境的多信息模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0257844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257844. eCollection 2021.
10
Modeling emotional contagion in the COVID-19 pandemic: a complex network approach.新冠疫情中情绪感染的建模:一种复杂网络方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Nov 20;9:e1693. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1693. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the impact of sentiment on multi-dimensional information dissemination using COVID-19 data in China.利用中国新冠肺炎数据探索情绪对多维度信息传播的影响。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107733. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107733. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
Social Sharing of Emotion During the COVID-19 Pandemic.社交媒体在新冠疫情期间的情绪共享。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Jun;25(6):369-376. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0270. Epub 2022 May 27.
3
Recognising the key role of individual recognition in social networks.认识到个体识别在社交网络中的关键作用。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Nov;36(11):1024-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
4
The impact of sharing physical activity experience on social network sites on residents' social connectedness:a cross-sectional survey during COVID-19 social quarantine.社交隔离期间 COVID-19 对社交网站上分享身体活动体验对居民社会联系的影响:一项横断面调查。
Global Health. 2021 Jan 11;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00661-z.