• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利语版《教育听力量表修订版》的跨文化适应与验证

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Listening Inventory for Education-Revised in Italian.

作者信息

Nicastri Maria, Dincer D'Alessandro Hilal, Anderson Karen, Ciferri Miriana, Cavalcanti Luca, Greco Antonio, Giallini Ilaria, Portanova Ginevra, Mancini Patrizia

机构信息

Department of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34500 Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2024 Sep 14;14(5):822-839. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14050069.

DOI:10.3390/audiolres14050069
PMID:39311222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11417904/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Listening difficulties may frequently occur in school settings, but so far there were no tools to identify them for both hearing and hearing-impaired Italian students. This study performed cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Listening Inventory for Education-Revised for Italian students (LIFE-R-ITA).

METHODS

The study procedure followed the stages suggested by the Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. For the content validation, six cochlear implanted students (8-18 years old) pre-tested the initial version. Whenever any situation did not occur in Italy, the item was adapted to more typical listening situations in Italy. The final version of LIFE-R-ITA was administered to a sample of 223 hearing students from different school settings and educational degrees in order to collect normative data.

RESULTS

For the LIFE-R-ITA, hearing students showed an average score of 72.26% (SD = 11.93), reflecting some listening difficulties. The subscales (LIFE total, LIFE class, and LIFE social) indicated good internal consistency. All items were shown to be relevant. Most challenging situations happened when listening in large rooms, especially when other students made noise. LIFE social scores were significantly worse than those of LIFE class ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides cross-cultural adaptation and validation for the LIFE-R-ITA along with the normative data useful to interpret the results of students with hearing loss. The LIFE-R-ITA may support teachers and clinicians in assessing students' self-perception of listening at school. Such understanding may help students overcome their listening difficulties, by planning and selecting the most effective strategies among classroom interventions.

摘要

背景

听力困难在学校环境中可能经常出现,但到目前为止,还没有工具可以识别意大利听力正常和听力受损的学生的听力困难。本研究对意大利学生修订版教育听力量表(LIFE-R-ITA)进行了跨文化改编和验证。

方法

研究程序遵循自我报告测量跨文化改编过程指南建议的阶段。对于内容验证,六名接受人工耳蜗植入的学生(8至18岁)对初始版本进行了预测试。每当意大利未出现任何情况时,就将该项目调整为意大利更典型的听力情况。LIFE-R-ITA的最终版本被施用于来自不同学校环境和教育程度的223名听力正常学生的样本,以收集常模数据。

结果

对于LIFE-R-ITA,听力正常的学生平均得分为72.26%(标准差=11.93),反映出一些听力困难。分量表(LIFE总分、LIFE课堂和LIFE社交)显示出良好的内部一致性。所有项目都被证明是相关的。最具挑战性的情况发生在大房间里聆听时,尤其是当其他学生制造噪音时。LIFE社交得分显著低于LIFE课堂得分(<0.001)。

结论

本研究为LIFE-R-ITA提供了跨文化改编和验证,以及有助于解释听力损失学生结果的常模数据。LIFE-R-ITA可以支持教师和临床医生评估学生在学校对听力的自我认知。这种理解可以通过在课堂干预中规划和选择最有效的策略来帮助学生克服听力困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/709d60635e39/audiolres-14-00069-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/fffa6403d478/audiolres-14-00069-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/2519ab30db7b/audiolres-14-00069-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/c00fa7e6b843/audiolres-14-00069-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/709d60635e39/audiolres-14-00069-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/fffa6403d478/audiolres-14-00069-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/2519ab30db7b/audiolres-14-00069-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/c00fa7e6b843/audiolres-14-00069-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f4/11417904/709d60635e39/audiolres-14-00069-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Listening Inventory for Education-Revised in Italian.意大利语版《教育听力量表修订版》的跨文化适应与验证
Audiol Res. 2024 Sep 14;14(5):822-839. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14050069.
2
Translation and validation of the Listen Inventory for Education Revised into Dutch.将《听力教育修订量表》翻译成荷兰语并进行效度验证。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;107:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Listening Difficulties of Children With Cochlear Implants in Mainstream Secondary Education.人工耳蜗植入儿童在主流中学教育中的听力困难。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1172-1186. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000835.
4
Functional hearing in the classroom: assistive listening devices for students with hearing impairment in a mainstream school setting.课堂中的功能性听力:主流学校环境中听力障碍学生的助听设备
Int J Audiol. 2016 Dec;55(12):723-729. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1225991. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
5
Classroom Listening Experiences of Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Using Listening Inventory For Education-Revised.使用《教育修订后的听力清单》对聋人或重听学生的课堂听力体验进行评估。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul 15;51(3):720-733. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00087. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Measuring Perceptions of Classroom Listening in Typically Developing Children and Children with Auditory Difficulties Using the LIFE-UK Questionnaire.使用英国生活问卷测量正常发育儿童和有听力困难儿童对课堂听力的认知。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Jul/Aug;29(7):656-667. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17053.
7
Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.正常听力儿童、正常听力成年人及人工耳蜗植入儿童听力能力的自我监测。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):206-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.3.7.
8
Self-reported listening effort in adults with and without hearing loss: the Danish version of the Effort Assessment Scale (D-EAS).成人听力损失患者与非听力损失患者的自我报告听力努力程度:努力评估量表(丹麦版)(D-EAS)。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jan;45(1):98-105. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2022781. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Being a deaf student in a face mask world: Survey data from Italian university students.在一个人人都戴口罩的世界里身为一名聋人学生:来自意大利大学生的调查数据。
Res Dev Disabil. 2023 Dec;143:104618. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104618. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
10
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Italian version of the active-empathic listening scale among undergraduate nursing students: A three phase validation study.本科护生主动共情倾听量表意大利语版的文化调适与心理计量学评估:三阶段验证研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104091. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104091. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between community noise and children's cognitive and behavioral development: A prospective cohort study.社区噪声与儿童认知和行为发育的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Environ Int. 2022 Jan;158:106961. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106961. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Speech and noise levels measured in occupied K-12 classrooms.在 K-12 教室内测量的语音和噪声水平。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Aug;150(2):864. doi: 10.1121/10.0005815.
3
Perceived Listening Difficulty in the Classroom, Not Measured Noise Levels, Is Associated With Fatigue in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
在课堂上感知到的听力困难,而不是测量到的噪声水平,与有听力损失和没有听力损失的儿童的疲劳有关。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):956-967. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00065. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
4
The influence of teacher-student proximity, teacher feedback, and near-seated peer groups on classroom engagement: An agent-based modeling approach.师生亲近度、教师反馈和邻座同伴群体对课堂参与的影响:基于代理的建模方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0244935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244935. eCollection 2021.
5
COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study.COSMIN 偏倚风险工具评估结局测量工具可靠性或测量误差研究的质量:德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5.
6
Perceived listening effort in children with hearing loss: listening to a dysphonic voice in quiet and in noise.听力损失儿童的感知聆听努力:在安静和嘈杂环境中聆听嗓音障碍者的声音。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2022 Apr;47(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2020.1794030. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Influence of Classroom Acoustics on Noise Disturbance and Well-Being for First Graders.教室声学对一年级学生噪声干扰及幸福感的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 13;10:2736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02736. eCollection 2019.
8
Auditory, Cognitive, and Linguistic Factors Predict Speech Recognition in Adverse Listening Conditions for Children With Hearing Loss.听觉、认知和语言因素可预测听力损失儿童在不利聆听条件下的言语识别能力。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 15;13:1093. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01093. eCollection 2019.
9
Is Classroom Noise Always Bad for Children? The Contribution of Age and Selective Attention to Creative Performance in Noise.课堂噪音对孩子总是有害吗?年龄和选择性注意力对嘈杂环境中创造性表现的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00381. eCollection 2019.
10
Influence of classroom acoustics on the reading speed: A case study on Italian second-graders.教室声学对阅读速度的影响:以意大利二年级学生为例的案例研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Aug;144(2):EL144. doi: 10.1121/1.5051050.