Institute of Sugar Beet Research, Holtenser Landstraße 77, 37079 Göttingen, Germany.
KWS Saat SE & Co. KGaA, 37574 Einbeck, Germany.
J Gen Virol. 2024 Sep;105(9). doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.002026.
Curly top disease caused by (BCTV) is a limiting factor for sugar beet production. The most economical and sustainable control of BCTV in sugar beet would be via the growth of resistant cultivars, although most commercial cultivars possess only low-to-moderate quantitative resistance. A double haploid line (KDH13) showed a high level of resistance to BCTV infection. However, the mechanism of resistance and response of this line to BCTV infection is unknown. Here, we tested the response of this line to both local and systemic BCTV infections. The virus replicated at a high level in locally infected tissue but lower than in susceptible KDH19 plants. Resistant KDH13 plants systemically infected with BCTV showed only mild enation without leaf curling after 30 days. In contrast, severe leaf curling appeared after 12 days in susceptible plants with higher virus accumulation. Transcriptome analysis of the BCTV-infected KDH13 plants at the early stage of symptom development showed only 132 genes that were exclusively deregulated compared to the regulation of a large number of genes (1018 genes) in KDH19 plants. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed genes were predominantly involved in hormone metabolism, DNA methylation, immune response, cell cycle, biotic stress and oxidative stress. The auxin level in both resistant and susceptible plants increased in response to BCTV infection. Remarkably, exogenous application of auxin caused leaf curling phenotype in the absence of the virus. This study demonstrates the response of resistant and susceptible plants to BCTV infection at both local and systemic infections and highlights the defence-related genes and metabolic pathways including auxin for their contribution towards BCTV symptom development and resistance in sugar beet.
卷叶病由 (BCTV)引起,是甜菜生产的一个限制因素。在甜菜中最经济和可持续的 BCTV 控制方法是通过生长抗性品种,尽管大多数商业品种仅具有低至中等的定量抗性。一个双单倍体系(KDH13)对 BCTV 感染表现出高水平的抗性。然而,该系对 BCTV 感染的抗性机制和反应尚不清楚。在这里,我们测试了该系对局部和系统 BCTV 感染的反应。病毒在局部感染组织中大量复制,但低于易感 KDH19 植物。系统感染 BCTV 的抗性 KDH13 植物在 30 天后仅表现出轻度畸形,没有叶片卷曲。相比之下,易感植物在 12 天后出现严重的叶片卷曲,病毒积累量更高。在症状发展的早期,对感染 BCTV 的 KDH13 植物进行转录组分析显示,与 KDH19 植物大量基因(1018 个基因)的调控相比,仅有 132 个基因被特异性调控。途径富集分析表明,差异表达基因主要参与激素代谢、DNA 甲基化、免疫反应、细胞周期、生物胁迫和氧化应激。在 BCTV 感染后,抗性和易感植物中的生长素水平均增加。值得注意的是,外源施加生长素会在没有病毒的情况下引起叶片卷曲表型。本研究表明了抗性和易感植物对局部和系统 BCTV 感染的反应,并强调了与防御相关的基因和代谢途径,包括生长素,它们对 BCTV 症状发展和甜菜抗性的贡献。