Upper Limb Department, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2644-2653. doi: 10.1111/os.14158. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage and autologous scapular spine bone grafting have been described as a treatment for off-track Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical glenoid bone defects in the anterior shoulder instability. However, whether these two techniques can achieve satisfactory postoperative outcomes is unclear, and there are few comparative studies between them. Therefore, this study compared the postoperative efficacy of the two techniques for off-track Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss.
Between June 2017 and December 2020, 62 patients with shoulder instability due to Off-Track Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss underwent surgical treatment and were included in this regression study. Thirty-two patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage (B + R group), and 30 patients underwent additional autologous scapular glenoid bone grafting (additional bone grafting group). The general information of the patients was recorded. The patient's activity before and after surgery was recorded. The DASH score and Constant-Murley (CM) score were used to assess the patient's functional status; the Rowe score was used to evaluate the patient's shoulder stability. The shoulder function and stability before and after surgery were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
The final DASH scores of the B + R group and the additional bone grafting group were significantly lower than those before surgery, with a statistically significant difference (9.76 ± 4.32 vs. 27.89 ± 6.63, 8.50 ± 3.32 vs. 28.0 ± 4.27, p = 0.000); the final CM scores of the two groups were significantly higher than those before surgery (88.71 ± 3.74 vs. 73.68 ± 3.74, 87.16 ± 2.29 vs. 71.37 ± 2.68, p = 0.000). There was no statistical difference in the final DASH score and final CM score between the two groups (p > 0.05). In terms of postoperative stability, the final Rowe scores of the two groups were significantly higher than those before surgery, with a statistically significant difference (89.06 ± 9.19 vs. 41.71 ± 4.13; 93.16 ± 4.99 vs. 42.33 ± 2.53, p = 0.000). Compared with the control group, the additional bone graft group achieved higher final Rowe scores (93.16 ± 4.99 vs. 89.06 ± 9.19, p = 0.032).
For patients with anterior shoulder instability due to off-track Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss, although Bankart and remplissage can achieve satisfactory clinical results, additional autogenous scapular spine bone grafting can provide better stability of the shoulder, especially for patients with high sports demands.
关节镜下 Bankart 修复术联合填充和自体肩胛冈骨移植已被描述为治疗前肩不稳定中轨道外 Hill-Sachs 病变伴临界下盂骨缺损的一种方法。然而,这两种技术是否能达到满意的术后效果尚不清楚,而且两者之间的比较研究很少。因此,本研究比较了两种技术治疗轨道外 Hill-Sachs 病变伴临界下盂骨丢失的术后疗效。
2017 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月,62 例因轨道外 Hill-Sachs 病变伴临界下盂骨缺损导致肩不稳定的患者接受了手术治疗,并纳入本回归研究。32 例患者行关节镜下 Bankart 修复术联合填充(B+R 组),30 例患者行额外的自体肩胛冈骨移植(额外植骨组)。记录患者的一般资料。记录患者术前和术后的活动情况。采用 DASH 评分和 Constant-Murley(CM)评分评估患者的功能状态;采用 Rowe 评分评估患者的肩部稳定性。分析比较两组患者手术前后的肩关节功能和稳定性。
B+R 组和额外植骨组的最终 DASH 评分明显低于术前,差异有统计学意义(9.76±4.32 比 27.89±6.63,8.50±3.32 比 28.00±4.27,p=0.000);两组最终 CM 评分明显高于术前(88.71±3.74 比 73.68±3.74,87.16±2.29 比 71.37±2.68,p=0.000)。两组最终 DASH 评分和最终 CM 评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在术后稳定性方面,两组最终 Rowe 评分均明显高于术前,差异有统计学意义(89.06±9.19 比 41.71±4.13;93.16±4.99 比 42.33±2.53,p=0.000)。与对照组相比,额外植骨组的最终 Rowe 评分更高(93.16±4.99 比 89.06±9.19,p=0.032)。
对于因临界下盂骨缺损伴轨道外 Hill-Sachs 病变导致的前肩不稳定患者,虽然 Bankart 加填充可以获得满意的临床效果,但额外的自体肩胛冈骨移植可以提供更好的肩部稳定性,特别是对于高运动需求的患者。