Bonnet Udo, Juckel Georg
Klinik für Seelische Gesundheit, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
LVR-Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2024 Sep 23. doi: 10.1055/a-2374-2218.
Introduction Preclinically, fluvoxamine and other antidepressants (AD) exerted antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties also against SARS-COV-2. Therfore, It makes sense to test the clinical effect of AD against COVID-19 and Long COVID.
On May 20, 2024, this systematic scoping review in PUBMED identified 1016 articles related to AD and COVID-19, Long COVID and SARS-COV-2. These included 10 retrospective "large scale" studies (> 20000 chart reviews), 8 prospective clinical trials (plus 4 regarding Long COVID), 11 placebo-controlled randomized (RCT) (plus 2 regarding Long COVID) and 15 meta-analyses.
COVID-19: Retrospective studies with cohorts taking AD primarily for psychiatric comorbidities or chronic pain conditions directly prior to SARS-COV-2 infection described that this substance class (most studied: Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors (SSRI) and Selective Serotonin Noradrenaline Re-Uptake Inhibitors (SSNRI)) were associated with (i) significantly fewer SARS-COV-2 infections and (ii) a milder course of COVID-19 ("COVID-19 protection"). Ten of the 11 RCTs found regarding COVID-19 tested fluvoxamine, as this old AD appeared suitable as a prophylactic agent against severe COVID-19, taking into account its in vitro potency against the progression of intracellular sepsis cascades. Therefore, most (12 out of 15) meta-analyses also referred to fluvoxamine. They found (iii) a significant (40-70% reduction) in mortality, intubation and hospitalization rates when fluvoxamine was used as an add-on to standard therapy for mild to moderate COVID-19. When this AD was used in the early stages of the disease, it was more successful than when it was given later in advanced, severe COVID-19 (e.g. severe pneumonia, final sepsis stages). A dose dependency was observed: 2x50 mg fluvoxamine over 15 days was less effective than 2x100 or even 3x100 mg with an adverse event profile still at the placebo level. Direct comparisons with drugs approved for COVID-19 do not yet exist. A first indirect meta-analytical comparison showed an advantage of paxlovid or molnupiravir versus fluvoxamine against the development of severe COVID-19: risk reduction of 95% (I2 = N/A, but only one study) or 78% (I2=0) versus 5+-5% (I2=48). However, an add-on of fluvoxamine was still significantly more efficacious than symptom-oriented standard therapy alone. Long COVID: A common Long COVID phenotype with dominant anxiety and depression symptoms, which responds to AD, relaxation therapy and/or psychotherapy, has now been identified. Casuistics report positive effects of AD on fatigue, cognitive and autonomic dysfunctions. A first large prospective open-label RCT has just shown significantly more favourable courses, less viral load and less pro-inflammatory cytokines in the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 with fluvoxamine versus standard treatment, also with regard to the subsequent development of neuropsychiatric and pulmonary Long COVID or fatigue.
Overall, there is promising evidence of a preventive effect of AD (especially fluvoxamine) against progression to severe COVID-19 and against the development of Long COVID. It is likely, that the entire AD substance class could be effective here. This assumption is based on the results of retrospective large scale studies, but awaits verification by better controlled studies. The potential effectiveness/efficacy (currently low and moderate confidence of the evidence for the entire substance class and specifically fluvoxamine, respectively) of fluvoxamine as an add-on against COVID-19 and possibly also directly against Long COVID could stimulate similar projects in other infectious diseases that also have the potential to pose a lasting threat to the health of those affected. We consider the evidence to date to be sufficient to be able to emphasize a possible positive effect of these substances in the psychoeducation of patients with COVID-19 or Long COVID who are already receiving AD for other conditions - especially also against the symptoms associated with the viral disease or its consequences. In regions where neither vaccines nor antiviral agents currently approved for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 are available, AD and in particular fluvoxamine would be a cost-effective alternative to protect against a severe course, even if this AD appears to have a smaller effect against COVID-19 than the currently approved antiviral agents, but with presumably better tolerability. A direct comparative clinical trial with approved antiviral agents is still pending and should be positive to further open the door for a guideline-based recommendation of fluvoxamine (or perhaps even AD) for COVID-19 or its aftermath.
引言 在临床前研究中,氟伏沙明和其他抗抑郁药(AD)对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)也具有抗病毒和抗炎特性。因此,测试抗抑郁药对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和新冠后遗症的临床效果是有意义的。
2024年5月20日,这项在PubMed上进行的系统综述纳入了1016篇与抗抑郁药和COVID-19、新冠后遗症及SARS-CoV-2相关的文章。其中包括10项回顾性“大规模”研究(超过20000例病历审查)、8项前瞻性临床试验(另外4项关于新冠后遗症)、11项安慰剂对照随机试验(RCT)(另外2项关于新冠后遗症)以及15项荟萃分析。
COVID-19:回顾性研究表明,在SARS-CoV-2感染之前主要因精神疾病合并症或慢性疼痛状况而服用抗抑郁药的队列中,这类药物(研究最多的:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和选择性5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SSNRI))与以下情况相关:(i)SARS-CoV-2感染显著减少,以及(ii)COVID-19病情较轻(“COVID-19保护作用”)。在11项关于COVID-19的RCT中,有10项测试了氟伏沙明,鉴于其对细胞内脓毒症级联反应进展的体外效力,这种老药似乎适合作为预防严重COVID-19的药物。因此,大多数(15项中的12项)荟萃分析也提到了氟伏沙明。他们发现,当氟伏沙明作为轻度至中度COVID-19标准治疗的附加药物使用时,(iii)死亡率、插管率和住院率显著降低(降低40%-70%)。当这种抗抑郁药在疾病早期使用时,比在晚期严重COVID-19(如严重肺炎、最终脓毒症阶段)时使用更成功。观察到剂量依赖性:15天内服用2×50mg氟伏沙明的效果不如2×100mg甚至3×100mg,且不良事件发生率仍处于安慰剂水平。目前尚无与已批准用于COVID-19的药物的直接比较。首次间接荟萃分析比较显示,帕罗韦德或莫努匹韦相对于氟伏沙明在预防严重COVID-19方面具有优势:风险降低95%(I² = 无可用数据,但仅有一项研究)或78%(I² = 0),而氟伏沙明为5±5%(I² = 48)。然而,氟伏沙明作为附加药物仍然比单纯的对症标准治疗显著更有效。新冠后遗症:现已确定一种常见的以焦虑和抑郁症状为主的新冠后遗症表型,对抗抑郁药、放松疗法和/或心理治疗有反应。病例报告显示抗抑郁药对疲劳、认知和自主神经功能障碍有积极作用。一项大型前瞻性开放标签RCT刚刚表明,与标准治疗相比,用氟伏沙明治疗轻度至中度COVID-19在后续神经精神和肺部新冠后遗症或疲劳的发生方面,有更有利的病程、更低的病毒载量和更少的促炎细胞因子。
总体而言,有令人鼓舞的证据表明抗抑郁药(尤其是氟伏沙明)对预防进展为严重COVID-19和预防新冠后遗症的发生有作用。整个抗抑郁药类别在此可能都有效。这一假设基于回顾性大规模研究的结果,但有待更好的对照研究验证。氟伏沙明作为COVID-19附加治疗药物以及可能直接针对新冠后遗症的潜在有效性/疗效(目前整个药物类别和氟伏沙明的证据分别具有低和中等可信度)可能会刺激其他传染病领域开展类似项目,这些传染病也有可能对受影响者的健康构成持久威胁。我们认为,迄今为止的证据足以强调这些药物对已经因其他病症正在服用抗抑郁药的COVID-19或新冠后遗症患者进行心理教育时可能产生的积极作用,特别是针对与病毒性疾病及其后果相关的症状。在目前既没有疫苗也没有已批准用于预防或治疗COVID-19的抗病毒药物的地区,抗抑郁药尤其是氟伏沙明将是预防严重病程的一种经济有效的替代方案,即使这种抗抑郁药对COVID-19的作用似乎比目前已批准的抗病毒药物小,但可能具有更好的耐受性。与已批准的抗病毒药物进行直接对比临床试验仍在进行中,若结果为阳性,将进一步为基于指南推荐氟伏沙明(甚至可能是抗抑郁药)用于COVID-19或其后遗症打开大门。