• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助覆盖对心血管风险因素的异质性影响:随机对照试验的二次分析。

Heterogeneous effects of Medicaid coverage on cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Hakubi Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ. 2024 Sep 23;386:e079377. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079377.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-079377
PMID:39313257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11417663/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether health insurance generated improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure and hemoglobin A (HbA) levels) for identifiable subpopulations, and using machine learning to identify characteristics of people predicted to benefit highly.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Medicaid insurance coverage in 2008 for adults on low incomes (defined as lower than the federal-defined poverty line) in Oregon who were uninsured.

PARTICIPANTS

12 134 participants from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment with in-person data for health outcomes for both treatment and control groups.

INTERVENTIONS

Health insurance (Medicaid) coverage.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The conditional local average treatment effects of Medicaid coverage on systolic blood pressure and HbA using a machine learning causal forest algorithm (with instrumental variables). Characteristics of individuals with positive predicted benefits of Medicaid coverage based on the algorithm were compared with the characteristics of others. The effect of Medicaid coverage was calculated on blood pressure and HbA among individuals with high predicted benefits.

RESULTS

In the in-person interview survey, mean systolic blood pressure was 119 (standard deviation 17) mm Hg and mean HbA concentrations was 5.3% (standard deviation 0.6%). Our causal forest model showed heterogeneity in the effect of Medicaid coverage on systolic blood pressure and HbA. Individuals with lower baseline healthcare charges, for example, had higher predicted benefits from gaining Medicaid coverage. Medicaid coverage significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (-4.96 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -7.80 to -2.48)) for people predicted to benefit highly. HbA was also significantly reduced by Medicaid coverage for people with high predicted benefits, but the size was not clinically meaningful (-0.12% (-0.25% to -0.01%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Medicaid coverage did not improve cardiovascular risk factors on average, substantial heterogeneity was noted in the effects within that population. Individuals with high predicted benefits were more likely to have no or low prior healthcare charges, for example. Our findings suggest that Medicaid coverage leads to improved cardiovascular risk factors for some, particularly for blood pressure, although those benefits may be diluted by individuals who did not experience benefits.

摘要

目的

调查医疗保险是否能改善可识别亚人群的心血管风险因素(血压和血红蛋白 A(HbA)水平),并使用机器学习来识别极有可能受益的人群的特征。

设计

随机对照试验的二次分析。

设置

俄勒冈州 2008 年为收入较低(定义为低于联邦贫困线)的未参保成年人提供的医疗补助保险。

参与者

来自俄勒冈健康保险实验的 12134 名参与者,他们有治疗组和对照组的健康结果的个人数据。

干预措施

医疗保险(医疗补助)覆盖。

主要观察指标

使用机器学习因果森林算法(工具变量)对医疗补助覆盖对收缩压和 HbA 的条件局部平均治疗效果。根据算法,比较具有医疗补助覆盖积极预测获益特征的个体与其他人的特征。计算了在高预测获益个体中医疗补助覆盖对血压和 HbA 的影响。

结果

在面对面访谈调查中,平均收缩压为 119(标准差 17)mmHg,平均 HbA 浓度为 5.3%(标准差 0.6%)。我们的因果森林模型显示,医疗补助覆盖对收缩压和 HbA 的影响存在异质性。例如,基线医疗费用较低的个体,从获得医疗补助覆盖中获益的预测更高。对于预测获益较高的人,医疗补助覆盖显著降低收缩压(-4.96mmHg(95%置信区间-7.80 至-2.48))。对于预测获益较高的人,HbA 也因医疗补助覆盖而显著降低,但幅度在临床意义上无差异(-0.12%(-0.25%至-0.01%))。

结论

尽管医疗补助覆盖平均没有改善心血管风险因素,但在该人群中观察到了显著的异质性。例如,预测获益较高的个体更有可能没有或仅有较低的前期医疗费用。我们的发现表明,医疗补助覆盖对一些人,特别是对血压,改善了心血管风险因素,尽管这些益处可能被那些没有受益的人稀释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2cb/11417663/ed7be18ad1a5/inok079377.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2cb/11417663/ed7be18ad1a5/inok079377.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2cb/11417663/ed7be18ad1a5/inok079377.f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Heterogeneous effects of Medicaid coverage on cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial.医疗补助覆盖对心血管风险因素的异质性影响:随机对照试验的二次分析。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 23;386:e079377. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079377.
2
Machine learning for detection of heterogeneous effects of Medicaid coverage on depression.机器学习在检测医疗补助覆盖对抑郁症的异质影响中的应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jul 8;193(7):951-958. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae008.
3
Medicaid Expansions and Crowd-Out: Evidence from HIFA Premium Assistance Programs.医疗补助扩大与挤出效应:来自健康保险费援助计划(HIFA)的证据
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51(1):117-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12317. Epub 2015 May 18.
4
Following the ACA Repeal-and-Replace Effort, Where Does the U.S. Stand on Insurance Coverage? Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey, March--June 2017.在《平价医疗法案》废除与替代努力之后,美国在医保覆盖方面处于何种状况?来自英联邦基金会《平价医疗法案》追踪调查的结果,2017年3月至6月
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Sep;2017:1-21.
5
Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.父母正在失去医疗补助覆盖的儿童中的未参保情况:俄勒冈州家庭全州范围调查结果
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):401-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00764.x.
6
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Health Insurance Coverage Among Persons With a Disability.医疗补助扩张与残疾人士健康保险覆盖之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197136. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7136.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
The Affordable Care Act: Effects of Insurance on Diabetes Biomarkers.平价医疗法案:保险对糖尿病生物标志物的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2074-2081. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1571. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment.扩大父母医疗补助对儿童健康保险覆盖范围的影响:俄勒冈试验的经验教训。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):e143145. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3145. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
10
Association Between the ACA Medicaid Expansions and Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Low-Income Individuals.《ACA 医疗补助扩张与低收入人群心血管风险因素变化的关联》
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2004-2012. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06417-6. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity in associations between food insecurity and diabetes outcomes.粮食不安全与糖尿病结局之间关联的异质性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1136/jech-2025-224037.
2
Severe housing cost burden and premature cardiovascular mortality.严重的住房成本负担与心血管疾病过早死亡
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jun 2;23:101021. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101021. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Poverty and Childhood Obesity: Current Evidence and Methodologies for Future Research.贫困与儿童肥胖:当前证据及未来研究方法

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Economic Policies With Hypertension Management and Control: A Systematic Review.经济政策与高血压管理和控制的关联:系统评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235231. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5231.
2
Harnessing causal forests for epidemiologic research: key considerations.利用因果森林进行流行病学研究:关键考虑因素。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 3;193(6):813-818. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae003.
3
Heterogeneity within the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: An application of causal forests.俄勒冈健康保险实验中的异质性:因果森林的应用。
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Apr 11;14(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00627-x.
4
Effects of Medicaid coverage on cardiovascular health outcomes.医疗补助计划覆盖对心血管健康结果的影响。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 23;386:q1807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q1807.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 18;19(1):e0297205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297205. eCollection 2024.
4
Global health security and universal health coverage: from fragmented aspirations to ambitious commitments.全球卫生安全与全民健康覆盖:从零散的愿望到宏伟的承诺。
BMJ. 2023 May 9;381:1029. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p1029.
5
Machine-learning-based high-benefit approach versus conventional high-risk approach in blood pressure management.基于机器学习的高获益方法与血压管理中的传统高风险方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1243-1256. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad037.
6
Urinary Stress Hormones, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.尿应激激素、高血压与心血管事件:动脉粥样硬化的多民族研究。
Hypertension. 2021 Nov;78(5):1640-1647. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17618. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
8
Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning.使用机器学习估计异质处理效应的元学习器。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4156-4165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804597116. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease.压力对心血管疾病的发展和进展的影响。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):215-229. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.189. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.