• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会地位在不公平现象的传播中起中介作用。

Social status mediates the propagation of unfairness.

作者信息

Kang Hyeran, Kim JuYoung, Kim Daeeun, Kim Hackjin

机构信息

Laboratory of Social and Decision Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychology, Korea Army Academy at Yeongcheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1253831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1253831. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1253831
PMID:39315034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11417036/
Abstract

Fairness constitutes a cornerstone of social norms, emphasizing equal treatment and equitable distribution in interpersonal relationships. Unfair treatment often leads to direct responses and can spread to others through a phenomenon known as pay-it-forward (PIF) reciprocity. This study examined how unfairness spreads in interactions with new partners who have higher, equal, or lower status than the participants. In the present study, participants ( = 47, all Korean) were given either fair or unfair treatment in the first round of a dictator game. They then allocated monetary resources among partners positioned at various hierarchical levels in the second round. Our main goal was to determine if the severity of inequity inflicted on new partners was influenced by their hierarchical status. The results revealed an inclination among participants to act more generously towards partners of higher ranking despite prior instances of unfair treatment, whereas a tendency for harsher treatment was directed towards those with lower ranking. The interaction between the fairness in the first round (DG1) and the hierarchical status of the partner in the second round (DG2) was significant, indicating that the effect of previous fairness on decision-making differed depending on the ranking of the new partners. This study, therefore, validates the presence of unfairness PIF reciprocity within hierarchical contexts.

摘要

公平是社会规范的基石,强调人际关系中的平等待遇和公平分配。不公平待遇往往会引发直接反应,并可能通过一种称为“传递正能量”(PIF)的互惠现象传播给他人。本研究考察了不公平在与地位高于、等同于或低于参与者的新伙伴互动中是如何传播的。在本研究中,参与者(n = 47,均为韩国人)在独裁者博弈的第一轮中受到公平或不公平待遇。然后,他们在第二轮中将货币资源分配给处于不同等级层次的伙伴。我们的主要目标是确定施加于新伙伴的不公平程度是否受到其等级地位的影响。结果显示,尽管之前存在不公平待遇的情况,但参与者倾向于对地位较高的伙伴表现得更为慷慨,而对地位较低的伙伴则有更严厉对待的倾向。第一轮(DG1)的公平性与第二轮(DG2)伙伴的等级地位之间的交互作用显著,表明先前公平性对决策的影响因新伙伴的等级不同而有所差异。因此,本研究证实了在等级背景下存在不公平的“传递正能量”互惠现象。

相似文献

1
Social status mediates the propagation of unfairness.社会地位在不公平现象的传播中起中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1253831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1253831. eCollection 2024.
2
Neural correlates of decision making after unfair treatment.不公平对待后决策的神经关联。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 5;9:123. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00123. eCollection 2015.
3
The carrot and the stick: How guilt and shame facilitate reciprocity-driven cooperation.胡萝卜加大棒:内疚和羞耻感如何促进互惠驱动的合作。
Cogn Emot. 2023 Feb;37(1):117-127. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2146057. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
Social norms of fairness with reputation-based role assignment in the dictator game.基于声誉的角色分配的独裁者游戏中的公平社会规范。
Chaos. 2022 Nov;32(11):113117. doi: 10.1063/5.0109451.
5
The impact of social comparison and (un)fairness on upstream indirect reciprocity: Evidence from ERP.社会比较和(不)公平对上游间接互惠的影响:来自 ERP 的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Dec 15;177:108398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108398. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
6
Moral reasoning in schizophrenia: an explorative study into economic decision making.精神分裂症中的道德推理:一项关于经济决策的探索性研究。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2011;16(4):348-63. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2010.539919. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
7
Generalized Negative Reciprocity in the Dictator Game--How to Interrupt the Chain of Unfairness.独裁者博弈中的广义负互惠——如何打断不公平链条
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 29;6:22316. doi: 10.1038/srep22316.
8
Punishment cost affects third-parties' behavioral and neural responses to unfairness.惩罚成本会影响第三方对不公平行为的行为和神经反应。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jul;177:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
9
Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness.提议者的经济状况会影响对不公平的行为和神经反应。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00847. eCollection 2017.
10
Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?内感受意识会影响调节他人不公平对待的能力吗?
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 29;4:880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00880. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
How does internet use affect the sense of gain in older adults? A moderated mediation model.互联网使用如何影响老年人的获得感?一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1538086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1538086. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The promise and pitfalls of the metaverse for science.元宇宙之于科学的前景与隐患。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;7(8):1237-1240. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01599-5.
2
Self-enhancement and physical health: A meta-analysis.自我提升与身体健康:一项荟萃分析。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):583-599. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12577. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Empathy and teachers' fairness behavior: The mediating role of moral obligation and moderating role of social value orientation.同理心和教师公平行为:道德义务的中介作用和社会价值取向的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0268681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268681. eCollection 2022.
4
Increased Conformity to Social Hierarchy Under Public Eyes.在公众目光下对社会等级制度的顺从增加。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;12:636801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636801. eCollection 2021.
5
Employee narcissism and promotability prospects.员工的自恋程度与晋升前景。
J Pers. 2021 Aug;89(4):847-862. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12619. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Paying it forward: The development and underlying mechanisms of upstream reciprocity.传递善意:上游互惠的发展和潜在机制。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104785. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104785. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
7
How hierarchy shapes our emotional lives: effects of power and status on emotional experience, expression, and responsiveness.等级制度如何塑造我们的情感生活:权力和地位对情感体验、表达和反应的影响。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
8
Do Infants in the First Year of Life Expect Equal Resource Allocations?一岁以内的婴儿能期望得到平等的资源分配吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00116. eCollection 2019.
9
Spreading inequality: neural computations underlying paying-it-forward reciprocity.传播不平等:促进互惠行为的神经计算。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):578-589. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy040.
10
Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review.自我增强与心理调适:元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Feb;23(1):48-72. doi: 10.1177/1088868318756467. Epub 2018 Mar 13.