Kang Hyeran, Kim JuYoung, Kim Daeeun, Kim Hackjin
Laboratory of Social and Decision Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychology, Korea Army Academy at Yeongcheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1253831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1253831. eCollection 2024.
Fairness constitutes a cornerstone of social norms, emphasizing equal treatment and equitable distribution in interpersonal relationships. Unfair treatment often leads to direct responses and can spread to others through a phenomenon known as pay-it-forward (PIF) reciprocity. This study examined how unfairness spreads in interactions with new partners who have higher, equal, or lower status than the participants. In the present study, participants ( = 47, all Korean) were given either fair or unfair treatment in the first round of a dictator game. They then allocated monetary resources among partners positioned at various hierarchical levels in the second round. Our main goal was to determine if the severity of inequity inflicted on new partners was influenced by their hierarchical status. The results revealed an inclination among participants to act more generously towards partners of higher ranking despite prior instances of unfair treatment, whereas a tendency for harsher treatment was directed towards those with lower ranking. The interaction between the fairness in the first round (DG1) and the hierarchical status of the partner in the second round (DG2) was significant, indicating that the effect of previous fairness on decision-making differed depending on the ranking of the new partners. This study, therefore, validates the presence of unfairness PIF reciprocity within hierarchical contexts.
公平是社会规范的基石,强调人际关系中的平等待遇和公平分配。不公平待遇往往会引发直接反应,并可能通过一种称为“传递正能量”(PIF)的互惠现象传播给他人。本研究考察了不公平在与地位高于、等同于或低于参与者的新伙伴互动中是如何传播的。在本研究中,参与者(n = 47,均为韩国人)在独裁者博弈的第一轮中受到公平或不公平待遇。然后,他们在第二轮中将货币资源分配给处于不同等级层次的伙伴。我们的主要目标是确定施加于新伙伴的不公平程度是否受到其等级地位的影响。结果显示,尽管之前存在不公平待遇的情况,但参与者倾向于对地位较高的伙伴表现得更为慷慨,而对地位较低的伙伴则有更严厉对待的倾向。第一轮(DG1)的公平性与第二轮(DG2)伙伴的等级地位之间的交互作用显著,表明先前公平性对决策的影响因新伙伴的等级不同而有所差异。因此,本研究证实了在等级背景下存在不公平的“传递正能量”互惠现象。