Sonaglioni Andrea, Fagiani Valeria, Rigoni Marta, Nicolosi Gian Luigi, Lucidi Alessandro, Caminati Antonella, Lombardo Michele, Harari Sergio
IRCCS MultiMedica.
Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2024 Sep 24;41(3):e2024042. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v41i3.15911.
During the last decade, a small number of studies have used speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) to investigate sarcoidosis effect on left ventricular (LV) mechanics in patients without overt heart disease. The present systematic review and meta-analysis has been primarily designed to summarize the main findings of these studies and to examine the overall influence of sarcoidosis on LV-global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
All echocardiographic studies assessing conventional echoDoppler parameters and myocardial strain indices in patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis (ECS) vs. healthy controls, selected from PubMed and EMBASE databases, were included. The risk of bias was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment of Case-Control Studies. Continuous data (LV-GLS and LVEF) were pooled as a standardized mean difference (SMD) comparing sarcoidosis group with healthy controls. The overall SMDs of LV-GLS and LVEF were calculated using the random-effect model.
The full-text of 13 studies with 785 ECS patients and 567 healthy controls were analyzed. Both average LVEF (60.5±6.6 vs 63.0±4.8%, P<0.001) and LV-GLS (-17.4±3.3 vs -21.0±2.7%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in ECS patients than controls. However, sarcoidosis showed a significantly larger effect on LV-GLS (SMD: -1.26, 95%CI -1.61,-0.91, P<0.001) rather than on LVEF (SMD: -0.51, 95%CI -0.83,-0.20, P=0.001). Substantial heterogeneity was found for the studies that assessed LV-GLS (I2=86.4%) and LVEF (I2=85.3%). Egger's test gave a P-value of 0.24 for LV-GLS and 0.32 for LVEF assessment, indicating no publication bias. On meta-regression analysis, none of the moderators was significantly associated with effect modification for both LV-GLS and LVEF (all P <0.05).
In patients without overt heart disease, the effect of sarcoidosis on LV-GLS is significantly greater than on LVEF. STE analysis should be implemented in clinical practice for the early detection of myocardial involvement in ECS patients.
在过去十年中,少数研究使用斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)来研究结节病对无明显心脏病患者左心室(LV)力学的影响。本系统评价和荟萃分析主要旨在总结这些研究的主要发现,并探讨结节病对左心室整体纵向应变(GLS)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的总体影响。
纳入所有从PubMed和EMBASE数据库中选取的评估心外结节病(ECS)患者与健康对照者的传统超声多普勒参数和心肌应变指标的超声心动图研究。采用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)病例对照研究质量评估方法评估偏倚风险。将连续数据(LV-GLS和LVEF)合并为标准化均数差(SMD),比较结节病组与健康对照组。使用随机效应模型计算LV-GLS和LVEF的总体SMD。
分析了13项研究的全文,其中包括785例ECS患者和567例健康对照者。ECS患者的平均LVEF(60.5±6.6 vs 63.0±4.8%,P<0.001)和LV-GLS(-17.4±3.3 vs -21.0±2.7%,P<0.001)均显著低于对照组。然而,结节病对LV-GLS的影响(SMD:-1.26,95%CI -1.61,-0.91,P<0.001)显著大于对LVEF的影响(SMD:-0.51,95%CI -0.83,-0.20,P=0.001)。在评估LV-GLS(I2=86.4%)和LVEF(I2=85.3%)的研究中发现了显著的异质性。Egger检验得出LV-GLS评估的P值为0.24,LVEF评估的P值为0.32,表明无发表偏倚。在荟萃回归分析中,对于LV-GLS和LVEF,没有一个调节因素与效应修饰显著相关(所有P<0.05)。
在无明显心脏病的患者中,结节病对LV-GLS的影响显著大于对LVEF的影响。在临床实践中应采用STE分析以早期检测ECS患者的心肌受累情况。