• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要肝切除术后动脉位置变化的新描述结果:回顾性研究。

Outcome of the novel description of arterial position changes after major liver resections: retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae110.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae110
PMID:39316638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11421472/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After major liver resections, anatomical shifts due to liver parenchymal hypertrophy and organ displacement can happen. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these anatomical changes on the main abdominal arteries (coeliac trunk and superior mesenteric artery) and on patient outcomes.

METHODS

All patients who underwent major liver resections (between January 2010 and July 2021) and who underwent preoperative and postoperative arterial-phase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT imaging were studied. Observed arterial position changes were classified into three groups: no position changes; class I position changes (vessel displacement with or without kinking with a vessel angle greater than 105°); and class II position changes (kinking less than or equal to 105°). The Mann-Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors for morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients (149 men and median age of 59 years) were enrolled. Arterial position changes were detected in a total of 145 patients (54.7%) (99 patients (37%) with class I position changes and 46 patients (18%) with class II position changes) and were observed more often after extended resection and right-sided resection (P < 0.001). Major complications were seen in 94 patients (35%) and the rate of mortality was 15% (40 patients died). Post-hepatectomy liver failure (P = 0.030), major complications (P < 0.001), and mortality (P = 0.004) occurred more frequently in patients with class II position changes. In multivariable analysis, arterial position change was an independent risk factor for post-hepatectomy liver failure (OR 2.86 (95% c.i. 1.06 to 7.72); P = 0.038), major complications (OR 2.10 (95% c.i. 1.12 to 3.93); P = 0.020), and mortality (OR 2.39 (95% c.i. 1.03 to 5.56); P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Arterial position changes post-hepatectomy are observed in the majority of patients and are significantly related to postoperative morbidities and mortality.

摘要

背景

在进行大肝切除术后,由于肝实质肥大和器官移位,可能会发生解剖移位。本研究的目的是评估这些解剖变化对主要腹部动脉(腹腔干和肠系膜上动脉)和患者预后的影响。

方法

研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月期间接受大肝切除术且术前和术后均行动脉期增强腹部 CT 成像的所有患者。观察到的动脉位置变化分为三组:无位置变化;I 类位置变化(伴有或不伴有 105°以上的血管扭曲的血管移位);II 类位置变化(扭曲小于或等于 105°)。采用 Mann-Whitney 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较连续变量,采用卡方检验和 Fisher 确切检验比较分类变量。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析确定发病率和死亡率的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 265 例患者(149 例男性,中位年龄 59 岁)。共发现 145 例(54.7%)患者存在动脉位置变化(99 例(37%)为 I 类位置变化,46 例(18%)为 II 类位置变化),且在扩大切除术和右半肝切除术更为常见(P<0.001)。94 例(35%)患者出现重大并发症,死亡率为 15%(40 例死亡)。II 类位置变化患者的术后肝衰竭(P=0.030)、重大并发症(P<0.001)和死亡率(P=0.004)更为常见。多变量分析显示,动脉位置变化是术后肝衰竭(OR 2.86(95%可信区间 1.06 至 7.72);P=0.038)、重大并发症(OR 2.10(95%可信区间 1.12 至 3.93);P=0.020)和死亡率(OR 2.39(95%可信区间 1.03 至 5.56);P=0.042)的独立危险因素。

结论

术后肝切除术后动脉位置变化在大多数患者中均可见,与术后并发症和死亡率显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/5f997fdc9bd6/zrae110f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/46caa016f018/zrae110f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/591982a60de6/zrae110f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/ff6554b90580/zrae110f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/5f997fdc9bd6/zrae110f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/46caa016f018/zrae110f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/591982a60de6/zrae110f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/ff6554b90580/zrae110f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d84/11421472/5f997fdc9bd6/zrae110f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome of the novel description of arterial position changes after major liver resections: retrospective study.主要肝切除术后动脉位置变化的新描述结果:回顾性研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae110.
2
Celiaco-mesenterial arterial aberrations in patients undergoing extended pancreatic resections: correlation of CT angiography with findings at surgery.接受扩大胰腺切除术患者的腹腔-肠系膜动脉变异:CT血管造影与手术 findings 的相关性 。(这里“findings”在医学语境下可灵活处理为“所见情况”等合适表述,整句可优化为“接受扩大胰腺切除术患者的腹腔-肠系膜动脉变异:CT血管造影与手术所见情况的相关性” )
JOP. 2010 Jul 5;11(4):348-57.
3
Direct Retrograde Bypass is Preferable to Antegrade Bypass for Open Mesenteric Revascularization.对于开放性肠系膜血管重建术,直接逆行旁路术优于顺行旁路术。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Defining perioperative risk after hepatectomy based on diagnosis and extent of resection.基于诊断和切除范围定义肝切除术后的围手术期风险。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):1917-28. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2634-x. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
Changes in Target Vessel Anatomy Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Midterm Results.血管腔内开窗动脉瘤修复术后靶血管解剖学变化:中期结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;27(3):445-451. doi: 10.1177/1526602820915492. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Arterial reconstructions for pediatric splanchnic artery occlusive disease.小儿内脏动脉阻塞性疾病的动脉重建。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1062-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.070. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Late patency of reconstructed visceral arteries after open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤开放修复术后内脏动脉重建的晚期通畅性。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1017-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.067. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
8
Clinician overconfidence in visual estimation of the posthepatectomy liver remnant volume: A proximal source of liver failure after major hepatic resection?临床医生对肝切除术后剩余肝脏体积的目测估计过于自信:这是大型肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的近端原因吗?
Surgery. 2024 Jun;175(6):1533-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Stenting of superior mesenteric and celiac arteries does not increase complication rates after fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair.经开窗分支腔内血管修复术后,对肠系膜上动脉和腹腔动脉进行支架置入术并不会增加并发症发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.043. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
10
Influence of diabetes on short-term outcome after major hepatectomy: an underestimated risk?糖尿病对肝切除术近期预后的影响:被低估的风险?
BMC Surg. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00971-w.

引用本文的文献

1
The best of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery in BJS Open: advancing frontiers towards 2025.《BJS 开放版》中肝胰胆(HPB)手术的最佳实践:迈向 2025 年的前沿进展
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae167.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)技术改良的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Nov 10;3(4):e221. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000221. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Post-hepatectomy liver failure: A timeline centered review.肝切除术后肝衰竭:以时间为中心的综述。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2023 Dec;22(6):554-569. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review.
当前关于肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的证据:全面综述。
BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac142.
4
Fellowship training in major liver surgery on high-risk patients.针对高危患者进行肝脏大手术的 fellowship 培训。
Br J Surg. 2022 Dec 13;110(1):106-107. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac349.
5
Noninvasively Assessed Portal Hypertension Grade Predicts Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Patients With HepatocellCarcinoma: A Multicenter Study.非侵入性评估的门静脉高压分级可预测肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭:一项多中心研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 14;12:934870. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.934870. eCollection 2022.
6
Is the ASA Classification Universal?美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类标准通用吗?
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Aug;49(4):298-303. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.103.
7
Assessment of the incidence of accessory hepatic arteries: a literature review.评估副肝动脉的发生率:文献综述。
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2022;81(3):533-543. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2021.0081. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
A systematic review of prediction models for post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients undergoing liver surgery.系统评价肝切除术后肝功能衰竭预测模型在肝手术患者中的应用。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Sep;23(9):1311-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of prophylactic abdominal drainage in major liver resections.系统评价和荟萃分析预防性腹部引流在大肝切除术中的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82333-x.
10
Liver regeneration after performing associating liver partition and portal vein occlusion for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is histologically similar to that occurring after liver transplantation using a small-for-size graft.行联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)后肝脏再生在组织学上类似于使用小体积供肝进行肝移植后发生的肝脏再生。
Surg Today. 2021 Mar;51(3):374-383. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02097-1. Epub 2020 Aug 9.