Lymphatic Surgeon at Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Research Center Plastic Surgery and Supermicrosurgery, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia.
School of Physiotherapy, Research center (FISIOTER), Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Medellín, Colombia.
Lymphat Res Biol. 2024 Oct;22(5):232-240. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2024.0014. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
Lymphedema is a common breast cancer side effect, with an average incidence of 30%. The gold standard conservative treatment for lymphedema is complex decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapy, skin care, and exercise. Lymphovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a microsurgical technique that intends to redirect excess lymphatic fluid to the venous circulation; this procedure is usually performed when conservative treatment fails. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of LVA and CDT for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and LILACS. Inclusion criteria were (1) population: women with BCRL; (2) intervention: treated with LVA and CDT; and (3) outcome: primary outcome was lymphedema reduction. Secondary outcome was quality of life. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. The search found 3872 articles, with 5 articles meeting the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) criteria, 4 pre-post studies, and one observational cohort study. The total sample included 2763 patients. Follow-up was variable. The follow-up varies from 7.8 to 120 months, with an average of 35 months. Lymphedema reduction was obtained in the five studies. The present systematic review suggests that for patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer, the combination of both treatments is effective in reducing the size of the limb and improving quality of life. Low-quality evidence was found for both limb circumference reduction and quality of life. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias and improve the quality of evidence, in order to better inform clinical practice and enhance the care and well-being of patients with BCRL.
淋巴水肿是一种常见的乳腺癌副作用,平均发病率为 30%。淋巴水肿的金标准保守治疗是复杂消肿治疗(CDT),包括手动淋巴引流、压迫治疗、皮肤护理和运动。淋巴管静脉吻合术(LVA)是一种旨在将多余的淋巴液引流到静脉循环的显微外科技术;当保守治疗失败时,通常会进行该手术。因此,本研究的目的是评估 LVA 和 CDT 治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的有效性。检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、SCOPUS 和 LILACS。纳入标准为:(1)人群:BCRL 女性;(2)干预措施:接受 LVA 和 CDT 治疗;(3)结局:主要结局是淋巴水肿减轻。次要结局是生活质量。还评估了偏倚风险和研究报告质量。检索到 3872 篇文章,符合 PICO(人群、干预、比较、结局)标准的有 5 篇文章,4 篇为前后对照研究,1 篇为观察性队列研究。总样本包括 2763 名患者。随访时间各不相同。随访时间从 7.8 到 120 个月不等,平均为 35 个月。五项研究均获得了淋巴水肿的减轻。本系统评价表明,对于乳腺癌继发淋巴水肿的患者,两种治疗方法的联合治疗可有效减小肢体尺寸并改善生活质量。但对于肢体周长缩小和生活质量,仅发现低质量证据。需要进一步的研究工作来减少偏倚并提高证据质量,以便更好地为临床实践提供信息,并增强 BCRL 患者的护理和幸福感。