Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Brazil.
Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Monogr Oral Sci. 2024;32:236-260. doi: 10.1159/000538890. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
One fourth of teeth affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) have required or will require treatment due to pain, sensitivity, or posteruptive breakdown. Restorative treatment becomes necessary in cases of severe MIH, characterized by posteruptive breakdown, which exhibits a wide range of clinical characteristics. Until approximately 20 years ago, all techniques, materials, and research were developed for treating caries lesions, not hypomineralisation. Research attempting to evaluate approaches to MIH treatment is recent and inconclusive. Therefore, there is still insufficient high-quality scientific evidence to establish a definitive clinical protocol for treating this condition. Recommendations based on best clinical practices can be provided rather than conclusions supported by a high level of evidence. To assist in clinical judgment regarding the best treatment strategy, eligible therapeutic options for restoring MIH-affected molars will be presented based on the strength and adhesive potential of the remaining hypomineralised enamel. The literature presents options for restorative materials ranging from direct alternatives such as glass ionomer cement and resin composite, through prefabricated devices, such as stainless-steel crowns and orthobands, to indirect restoration alternatives. However, it is essential to understand the indications of each restorative alternative and to know the restorative techniques, many of which are specifically developed to mitigate the difficulties encountered with the use of conventional techniques. Emphasis will be placed on the importance of adopting a personalized approach to restorative decision-making, considering the philosophy of minimal intervention dentistry and potential benefits for the patient's well-being and the family's needs.
四分之一的受磨牙牙釉质不全(MIH)影响的牙齿因疼痛、敏感或萌出后破裂而需要或将要接受治疗。在严重 MIH 的情况下,需要进行修复治疗,其特征是萌出后破裂,表现出广泛的临床特征。直到大约 20 年前,所有用于治疗龋齿病变的技术、材料和研究都是针对龋病开发的,而不是针对牙釉质不全。尝试评估 MIH 治疗方法的研究是最近的,尚无定论。因此,仍然缺乏高质量的科学证据来建立治疗这种情况的明确临床方案。可以提供基于最佳临床实践的建议,而不是基于高水平证据支持的结论。为了帮助临床判断最佳治疗策略,可以根据剩余矿化不足的牙釉质的强度和黏附潜力,为受 MIH 影响的磨牙提供恢复性治疗的选择。文献中提出了各种修复材料的选择,从玻璃离子水门汀和树脂复合材料等直接替代物,到不锈钢冠和正畸带等预制装置,再到间接修复替代物。然而,了解每种修复替代物的适应症以及了解修复技术至关重要,其中许多技术是专门为减轻使用常规技术时遇到的困难而开发的。重点将放在采用个性化方法进行修复决策的重要性上,考虑到微创牙科的理念和对患者福祉以及家庭需求的潜在益处。