• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你会增进我的快乐还是抑制它?浪漫关系中享乐主义人际情绪调节的文化差异。

Will you boost my joy or dampen it? Cultural differences in hedonic interpersonal emotion regulation in romantic relationships.

作者信息

Li Yue, Ge Fiona, Pietromonaco Paula R, Park Jiyoung

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Dallas.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

出版信息

Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):507-525. doi: 10.1037/emo0001427. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1037/emo0001427
PMID:39325399
Abstract

A central tenet guiding contemporary research on emotions is that people are fundamentally motivated to feel good and avoid feeling bad. This principle translates from intrapersonal to extrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation; people not only strive to achieve the hedonic goal of managing their own emotions, but they also help others reach the same goal-the process called hedonic interpersonal emotion regulation (hedonic IER). Here, we challenge the centrality of this principle in romantic relationships by testing a hypothesis that, compared with European Americans, Asians use hedonic IER less and benefit less from their partners' use of this strategy. Findings across three studies (total = 2,540) supported this hypothesis. First, European Americans used hedonic IER more than Asians both in positive and negative situations, and, moreover, this cultural difference was mediated by dialectical beliefs about emotions (Study 1). Second, compared with Chinese, European Americans anticipated greater relationship satisfaction in response to their partners' hedonic IER attempts in both positive and negative situations, and this effect was again mediated by dialectical emotion beliefs (Study 2). Third, compared with Asian couples, European American couples perceived that their partners used hedonic IER more in positive situations. Moreover, when European Americans perceived that their partners used hedonic IER more, they showed greater vagal withdrawal during a positive discussion (i.e., physiological reactivity linked to enhanced social sensitivity and engagement), while Asians did not show this association (Study 3). These findings highlight the critical role of sociocultural contexts in shaping IER and its relational consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

指导当代情绪研究的一个核心原则是,人们从根本上有动机去感受良好并避免感受糟糕。这一原则从人际内部延伸到外在的人际情绪调节;人们不仅努力实现管理自身情绪的享乐目标,还会帮助他人达成同样的目标——这个过程被称为享乐性人际情绪调节(享乐性IER)。在此,我们通过检验一个假设来挑战这一原则在浪漫关系中的核心地位,即与欧裔美国人相比,亚洲人较少使用享乐性IER,且从伴侣使用这种策略中获得的益处也较少。三项研究(总计2540人)的结果支持了这一假设。首先,无论是在积极还是消极情境中,欧裔美国人比亚洲人更多地使用享乐性IER,而且这种文化差异是由对情绪的辩证信念所介导的(研究1)。其次,与中国人相比,欧裔美国人预期在积极和消极情境中,伴侣尝试进行享乐性IER会带来更高的关系满意度,并且这种效应同样由辩证情绪信念所介导(研究2)。第三,与亚洲情侣相比,欧裔美国情侣认为伴侣在积极情境中更多地使用享乐性IER。此外,当欧裔美国人认为伴侣更多地使用享乐性IER时,他们在积极讨论中表现出更大的迷走神经退缩(即与增强的社会敏感性和参与度相关的生理反应),而亚洲人则没有表现出这种关联(研究3)。这些发现凸显了社会文化背景在塑造IER及其关系后果方面的关键作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Will you boost my joy or dampen it? Cultural differences in hedonic interpersonal emotion regulation in romantic relationships.你会增进我的快乐还是抑制它?浪漫关系中享乐主义人际情绪调节的文化差异。
Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):507-525. doi: 10.1037/emo0001427. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
The interpersonal risks of valuing happiness: Links to interpersonal emotion regulation and close others' mental health.重视幸福的人际风险:与人际情绪调节及亲密他人心理健康的关联。
Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):488-506. doi: 10.1037/emo0001443. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
4
'I live with my emotions much better now': A qualitative study of autistic adults' subjective experience of dialectical behaviour therapy.“我现在能更好地与自己的情绪共处了”:一项关于自闭症成年人辩证行为疗法主观体验的定性研究
Autism. 2025 Jun 18:13623613251348271. doi: 10.1177/13623613251348271.
5
Interventions for fertility preservation in women with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.对接受化疗的癌症女性进行生育力保存的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 19;6:CD012891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012891.pub2.
6
Understanding and Overcoming Negative Attitudes That Hinder Adoption of Reablement in Dementia Care: An Explorative Qualitative Study.理解并克服阻碍痴呆症护理中采用康复护理的消极态度:一项探索性定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 12;18:3411-3422. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522515. eCollection 2025.
7
Towards a patient-centred definition for atopic dermatitis flare: a qualitative study of adults with atopic dermatitis.迈向以患者为中心的特应性皮炎发作定义:一项特应性皮炎成人患者的定性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):82-91. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae037.
8
Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men.适用于女性和男性中重度尿失禁和/或大便失禁的吸收性产品。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD007408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007408.
9
Interpersonal emotion regulation during relationship conflict: Daily and longitudinal associations with couples' sexual well-being.关系冲突中的人际情绪调节:与夫妻性健康的日常及纵向关联。
Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):397-409. doi: 10.1037/emo0001400. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpersonal Conversations Are Characterized by Increases in Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia.人际对话的特征是呼吸性窦性心律不齐增加。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Mar;62(3):e70043. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70043.