Li Yue, Ge Fiona, Pietromonaco Paula R, Park Jiyoung
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Dallas.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):507-525. doi: 10.1037/emo0001427. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
A central tenet guiding contemporary research on emotions is that people are fundamentally motivated to feel good and avoid feeling bad. This principle translates from intrapersonal to extrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation; people not only strive to achieve the hedonic goal of managing their own emotions, but they also help others reach the same goal-the process called hedonic interpersonal emotion regulation (hedonic IER). Here, we challenge the centrality of this principle in romantic relationships by testing a hypothesis that, compared with European Americans, Asians use hedonic IER less and benefit less from their partners' use of this strategy. Findings across three studies (total = 2,540) supported this hypothesis. First, European Americans used hedonic IER more than Asians both in positive and negative situations, and, moreover, this cultural difference was mediated by dialectical beliefs about emotions (Study 1). Second, compared with Chinese, European Americans anticipated greater relationship satisfaction in response to their partners' hedonic IER attempts in both positive and negative situations, and this effect was again mediated by dialectical emotion beliefs (Study 2). Third, compared with Asian couples, European American couples perceived that their partners used hedonic IER more in positive situations. Moreover, when European Americans perceived that their partners used hedonic IER more, they showed greater vagal withdrawal during a positive discussion (i.e., physiological reactivity linked to enhanced social sensitivity and engagement), while Asians did not show this association (Study 3). These findings highlight the critical role of sociocultural contexts in shaping IER and its relational consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
指导当代情绪研究的一个核心原则是,人们从根本上有动机去感受良好并避免感受糟糕。这一原则从人际内部延伸到外在的人际情绪调节;人们不仅努力实现管理自身情绪的享乐目标,还会帮助他人达成同样的目标——这个过程被称为享乐性人际情绪调节(享乐性IER)。在此,我们通过检验一个假设来挑战这一原则在浪漫关系中的核心地位,即与欧裔美国人相比,亚洲人较少使用享乐性IER,且从伴侣使用这种策略中获得的益处也较少。三项研究(总计2540人)的结果支持了这一假设。首先,无论是在积极还是消极情境中,欧裔美国人比亚洲人更多地使用享乐性IER,而且这种文化差异是由对情绪的辩证信念所介导的(研究1)。其次,与中国人相比,欧裔美国人预期在积极和消极情境中,伴侣尝试进行享乐性IER会带来更高的关系满意度,并且这种效应同样由辩证情绪信念所介导(研究2)。第三,与亚洲情侣相比,欧裔美国情侣认为伴侣在积极情境中更多地使用享乐性IER。此外,当欧裔美国人认为伴侣更多地使用享乐性IER时,他们在积极讨论中表现出更大的迷走神经退缩(即与增强的社会敏感性和参与度相关的生理反应),而亚洲人则没有表现出这种关联(研究3)。这些发现凸显了社会文化背景在塑造IER及其关系后果方面的关键作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)