• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境税如何影响高排放企业的环境投资:来自中国的证据。

How do environmental taxes affect the environmental investment of high-emission enterprises: Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Accounting, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, 210023, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122629. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122629. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122629
PMID:39326077
Abstract

Countries worldwide have adopted environmental taxes to reduce pollution, making it essential for policymakers and researchers to understand their impact on corporate environmental investment. This study investigates the impact of China's environmental tax law on the environmental investment behavior of high-emission enterprises, using a Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach based on a quasi-natural experiment. The findings reveal that environmental taxes significantly incentivize these enterprises to increase their environmental investments, with the proportion of investment relative to total assets rising by approximately 82% compared to low-emission firms. This effect remains robust after controlling for various tests, including parallel trends, placebo tests, and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) tests, as well as excluding firms that never disclosed pollutant discharge tax payments or expected effects. Motivation analysis shows that high-emission enterprises are driven primarily by the goal of reducing pollution costs to engage in environmental governance. Mechanism analysis indicates that the implementation of environmental taxes strengthens corporate governance, further encouraging environmental governance activities. Cross-sectional analysis reveals that these effects are most pronounced in firms with high financing constraints, elevated operating costs, or low profitability. Additionally, environmental investment is found to enhance corporate productivity, net sales margins, and social evaluations. This study enhances the understanding of how environmental regulation influences corporate behavior, offering empirical evidence that environmental taxes foster sustainable practices and enhance corporate performance.

摘要

各国已采取环境税以减少污染,这使得政策制定者和研究人员必须了解其对企业环境投资的影响。本研究采用基于准自然实验的双重差分法(DID),考察了中国环境税法对高排放企业环境投资行为的影响。结果表明,环境税显著激励了这些企业增加环境投资,相对于低排放企业,投资占总资产的比例增加了约 82%。在进行各种检验,包括平行趋势检验、安慰剂检验、倾向得分匹配(PSM)检验,以及排除从未披露污染物排放税或预期影响的企业后,这一效应仍然稳健。动机分析表明,高排放企业主要出于降低污染成本的目的进行环境治理。机制分析表明,环境税的实施加强了公司治理,进一步鼓励了环境治理活动。横截面分析表明,在融资约束较高、运营成本较高或盈利能力较低的企业中,这些效应最为明显。此外,环境投资被发现可以提高企业的生产力、净销售利润率和社会评价。本研究增进了对环境规制如何影响企业行为的理解,提供了环境税促进可持续实践和提高企业绩效的经验证据。

相似文献

1
How do environmental taxes affect the environmental investment of high-emission enterprises: Evidence from China.环境税如何影响高排放企业的环境投资:来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122629. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122629. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Can environmental protection tax alleviate the mismatch of financing and investment maturities of heavily polluting enterprises?环境保护税能否缓解重污染企业融资与投资期限错配问题?
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Oct;207:116896. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116896. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
3
The influence of environmental tax reform on corporate profit margins-based on the empirical research of the enterprises in the heavy pollution industries.环境税改革对企业利润率的影响——基于重污染行业企业的实证研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):36337-36349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24893-7. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance-Evidence from China.环境规制与企业避税——来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261037. eCollection 2022.
5
Can environmental protection tax force enterprises to improve green technology innovation?环保税能否倒逼企业提升绿色技术创新?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(6):9371-9391. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31736-6. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
6
The environmental cost of tax administration: evidence from a regression discontinuity design in China.税收征管的环境成本:来自中国一项断点回归设计的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):11046-11064. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22976-z. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
7
Do regional tax incentive policies improve productivity?区域税收激励政策能提高生产力吗?
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0307561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307561. eCollection 2024.
8
The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China.环境保护税法对中国重污染企业的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261342. eCollection 2021.
9
Does corporate environmental investment impede financial performance of Chinese enterprises? The moderating role of financial constraints.企业环境投资是否阻碍了中国企业的财务绩效?金融约束的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(41):58007-58017. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14736-2. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
10
Increasing short-term lending for long-term investment under environmental pressure: evidence from China's energy-intensive firms.在环境压力下增加短期贷款用于长期投资:来自中国能源密集型企业的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14693-14706. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23190-7. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The actual effect and mechanism of environmental protection taxes on carbon emission reduction: evidence from China.环境保护税对碳排放减少的实际效果及作用机制:来自中国的证据
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 3;15(1):23710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06817-w.