School of Accounting, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, 210023, China.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122629. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122629. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
Countries worldwide have adopted environmental taxes to reduce pollution, making it essential for policymakers and researchers to understand their impact on corporate environmental investment. This study investigates the impact of China's environmental tax law on the environmental investment behavior of high-emission enterprises, using a Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach based on a quasi-natural experiment. The findings reveal that environmental taxes significantly incentivize these enterprises to increase their environmental investments, with the proportion of investment relative to total assets rising by approximately 82% compared to low-emission firms. This effect remains robust after controlling for various tests, including parallel trends, placebo tests, and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) tests, as well as excluding firms that never disclosed pollutant discharge tax payments or expected effects. Motivation analysis shows that high-emission enterprises are driven primarily by the goal of reducing pollution costs to engage in environmental governance. Mechanism analysis indicates that the implementation of environmental taxes strengthens corporate governance, further encouraging environmental governance activities. Cross-sectional analysis reveals that these effects are most pronounced in firms with high financing constraints, elevated operating costs, or low profitability. Additionally, environmental investment is found to enhance corporate productivity, net sales margins, and social evaluations. This study enhances the understanding of how environmental regulation influences corporate behavior, offering empirical evidence that environmental taxes foster sustainable practices and enhance corporate performance.
各国已采取环境税以减少污染,这使得政策制定者和研究人员必须了解其对企业环境投资的影响。本研究采用基于准自然实验的双重差分法(DID),考察了中国环境税法对高排放企业环境投资行为的影响。结果表明,环境税显著激励了这些企业增加环境投资,相对于低排放企业,投资占总资产的比例增加了约 82%。在进行各种检验,包括平行趋势检验、安慰剂检验、倾向得分匹配(PSM)检验,以及排除从未披露污染物排放税或预期影响的企业后,这一效应仍然稳健。动机分析表明,高排放企业主要出于降低污染成本的目的进行环境治理。机制分析表明,环境税的实施加强了公司治理,进一步鼓励了环境治理活动。横截面分析表明,在融资约束较高、运营成本较高或盈利能力较低的企业中,这些效应最为明显。此外,环境投资被发现可以提高企业的生产力、净销售利润率和社会评价。本研究增进了对环境规制如何影响企业行为的理解,提供了环境税促进可持续实践和提高企业绩效的经验证据。