Desai Jay, Okeke Raymond I, Desai Roshani, Zhang Zidong, Engelhardt Annabel, Schnitzler Mark, Barron John, Varma Chintalapati R, Randall Henry B, Lentine Krista L, Nazzal Mustafa
Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, USA.
Gastroenterology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67960. eCollection 2024 Aug.
The ultimate preferred treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension is an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Loco regional therapy (LRT) has emerged to prevent tumor growth and progression of disease beyond the Milan criteria to achieve transplant. There is a paucity of data regarding safety, posttransplant survival benefits, and tumor recurrence rate achieved by these LRT modalities. We aim to assess and compare the five-year survival rate and tumor recurrence rate with or without LRT in patients after OLT with diagnosed HCC utilizing the nation's largest dataset. This is a retrospective observational study approved by Saint Louis University institutional review board. We utilized the largest dataset from the years 2003-2013 where pertaining data were gathered from Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) standard analysis and research files (STAR) through novel linkages with Medicare bills. Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed. 2412 (51.6%) patients received any form of locoregional therapy (single or combination) out of 4669 total study sample size. The overall five-year survival in the study sample was 76.1%. There was statistically no significant improvement seen in five-year posttransplant survival in the group that received one mode of LRT (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.97, P<0.64) or a combination of LRT (aHR 0.94, P<0.58) in comparison to those that received none after adjusting donor and recipient clinical characteristics. However, five-year survival trended higher among those treated with combination therapy over those treated with single LRT or none. Overall HCC recurrence was 4.8%, while no significant difference was noted when comparing above-mentioned groups. Five-year posttransplant survival and HCC recurrence rate were also found to have no difference when compared between above-mentioned groups after adjusting explant pathology. This is the largest retrospective study comparing liver transplant patients with HCC who received LRT to none. Although it did not show any statistically significant benefit of single or combination of LRT on survival or tumor recurrence after liver transplant for HCC patients, the outcomes encourage the safe and feasible use of LRT as a bridging therapy. Our study also suggests an observed pattern of improved posttransplant survival and tumor recurrence rate with combination loco-regional therapy. Larger multicenter prospective studies will be required to achieve the effect size to determine the best therapies for maximizing patient survival cost-effectively.
肝细胞癌(HCC)合并肝硬化和门静脉高压症的最终首选治疗方法是原位肝移植(OLT)。局部区域治疗(LRT)已出现,以防止肿瘤生长和疾病进展超出米兰标准从而实现移植。关于这些LRT方式的安全性、移植后生存获益以及肿瘤复发率的数据很少。我们旨在利用全国最大的数据集评估和比较诊断为HCC的OLT患者接受或未接受LRT的五年生存率和肿瘤复发率。这是一项经圣路易斯大学机构审查委员会批准的回顾性观察性研究。我们使用了2003年至2013年的最大数据集,通过与医疗保险账单的新型关联,从器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)标准分析和研究文件(STAR)中收集相关数据。进行了描述性和比较性统计。在4669名总研究样本量中,2412名(51.6%)患者接受了任何形式的局部区域治疗(单一或联合)。研究样本的总体五年生存率为76.1%。在调整供体和受体临床特征后,接受单一模式LRT的组(调整后风险比(aHR)0.97,P<0.64)或LRT联合治疗的组(aHR 0.94,P<0.58)与未接受LRT的组相比,移植后五年生存率在统计学上没有显著改善。然而,联合治疗组的五年生存率比接受单一LRT或未接受LRT的组更高。总体HCC复发率为4.8%,在比较上述组时未发现显著差异。在调整外植体病理后,上述组之间的移植后五年生存率和HCC复发率也没有差异。这是比较接受LRT与未接受LRT的HCC肝移植患者的最大回顾性研究。虽然它没有显示LRT单一或联合治疗对HCC患者肝移植后的生存或肿瘤复发有任何统计学上的显著益处,但这些结果鼓励安全可行地使用LRT作为桥接治疗。我们的研究还表明,联合局部区域治疗观察到移植后生存和肿瘤复发率有所改善的模式。需要更大规模的多中心前瞻性研究来达到效应量,以确定最具成本效益地最大化患者生存的最佳治疗方法。