性取向和性别认同导致的自我报告社会风险因素的不平等。

Inequities in Self-Reported Social Risk Factors by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Sep 6;5(9):e243176. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3176.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sexual minority (ie, people who self-identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual identities) and gender minority (ie, people who self-identify as transgender, nonbinary, or other noncisgender identities) adults report worse health outcomes compared with heterosexual and cisgender adults, respectively. Although social risk factors (SRFs; eg, housing instability) are associated with health outcomes, little is known about the prevalence of SRFs among sexual and gender minority adults.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in the prevalence of SRFs by sexual orientation and gender identity among adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data collected from January 2022 to February 2023 for adults aged 18 years or older residing in 22 US states.

EXPOSURE

Self-reported sexual orientation and gender identity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcome measures were dissatisfaction with life, lack of emotional support, social isolation, employment loss in the past 12 months, Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program participation in the past 12 months, insufficient food, inability to pay bills, inability to pay utilities, lack of transportation, and stress. Survey weights were applied. Multivariable linear regression models were used to measure the association between sexual orientation and gender identity for each outcome.

RESULTS

The study sample comparing outcomes by sexual orientation included 178 803 individuals: 84 881 men (48.5%; 92.9% heterosexual; 7.1% sexual minority) and 93 922 women (51.5%; 89.4% heterosexual; 10.6% sexual minority). The study sample comparing outcomes by gender identity included 182 690 adults (99.2% cisgender; 0.8% gender minority). Of sexual minority women, 58.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with 36.5% of heterosexual women. Sexual minority women were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 7.4 percentage points [PP]; 95% CI, 4.9-10.0 PP) and stress (difference, 12.2 PP; 95% CI, 9.8-14.7 PP) compared with heterosexual women. A greater proportion of sexual minority men (51.1%) reported at least 1 SRF than heterosexual men (34.0%); the largest magnitudes of inequity were in dissatisfaction with life (difference, 7.9 PP; 95% CI, 5.8-10.1 PP) and stress (difference, 6.7 PP; 95% CI, 4.5-8.9 PP). Of gender minority adults, 64.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with cisgender adults (37.1%). Gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 14.8 PP; 95% CI, 9.9-19.7 PP) and stress (difference, 17.0 PP; 95% CI, 11.9-22.1 PP).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, sexual and gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report multiple SRFs. These findings suggest that policies and community-based systems to advance socioeconomic equity among sexual and gender minority adults are critical.

摘要

重要性

与异性恋和顺性别成年人相比,性少数群体(即自我认同为同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和其他非异性恋身份的人)和性别少数群体(即自我认同为跨性别、非二元或其他非顺性别身份的人)报告的健康结果更差。尽管社会风险因素(例如住房不稳定)与健康结果相关,但人们对性少数群体和性别少数群体成年人中社会风险因素的流行程度知之甚少。

目的

研究性取向和性别认同不同的成年人中社会风险因素的流行程度差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面研究,使用了 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间从美国 22 个州居住的 18 岁及以上成年人中收集的行为风险因素监测系统数据。

暴露

自我报告的性取向和性别认同。

主要结果和措施

结局指标为生活满意度低、缺乏情感支持、社会孤立、过去 12 个月失业、过去 12 个月参加补充营养援助计划、食物不足、无法支付账单、无法支付水电费、缺乏交通工具和压力。应用了调查权重。多变量线性回归模型用于测量性取向和性别认同对每个结局的关联。

结果

本研究样本比较性取向的结果包括 178803 人:84881 名男性(48.5%;92.9%为异性恋;7.1%为性少数群体)和 93922 名女性(51.5%;89.4%为异性恋;10.6%为性少数群体)。本研究样本比较性别认同的结果包括 182690 名成年人(99.2%顺性别;0.8%性别少数群体)。性少数群体女性中有 58.1%报告至少有 1 个社会风险因素,而异性恋女性中这一比例为 36.5%。性少数群体女性明显更有可能报告社会孤立(差异,7.4 个百分点[PP];95%置信区间,4.9-10.0 PP)和压力(差异,12.2 PP;95%置信区间,9.8-14.7 PP),而异性恋女性的报告则明显较少。性少数男性(51.1%)报告至少有 1 个社会风险因素的比例高于异性恋男性(34.0%);不平等程度最大的是对生活的不满(差异,7.9 PP;95%置信区间,5.8-10.1 PP)和压力(差异,6.7 PP;95%置信区间,4.5-8.9 PP)。性别少数群体成年人中有 64.1%报告至少有 1 个社会风险因素,而顺性别成年人这一比例为 37.1%。性别少数群体成年人明显更有可能报告社会孤立(差异,14.8 PP;95%置信区间,9.9-19.7 PP)和压力(差异,17.0 PP;95%置信区间,11.9-22.1 PP)。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,性少数群体和性别少数群体成年人更有可能报告多个社会风险因素。这些发现表明,推进性少数群体和性别少数群体成年人社会经济公平的政策和社区为基础的系统至关重要。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索