Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435895. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35895.
Buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) is safe and effective, but opioid withdrawal during treatment initiation is associated with poor retention in care. As fentanyl has replaced heroin in the drug supply, case reports and surveys have indicated increased concern for buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal (PW); however, some observational studies have found a low incidence of PW.
To estimate buprenorphine PW incidence and assess factors associated with PW among emergency department (ED) or hospitalized patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study at 3 academic hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, included adults with OUD who underwent traditional or high-dose buprenorphine initiation between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Exclusion criteria included low-dose buprenorphine initiation and missing documentation of opioid withdrawal severity within 4 hours of receiving buprenorphine.
Buprenorphine initiation with an initial dose of at least 2 mg of sublingual buprenorphine after a Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score of 8 or higher. Additional exposures included 4 predefined factors potentially associated with PW: severity of opioid withdrawal before buprenorphine (COWS score of 8-12 vs ≥13), initial buprenorphine dose (2 vs 4 or ≥8 mg), body mass index (BMI) (<25 vs 25 to <30 or ≥30; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), and urine fentanyl concentration (0 to <20 vs 20 to <200 or ≥200 ng/mL).
The main outcome was PW incidence, defined as a 5-point or greater increase in COWS score from immediately before to within 4 hours after buprenorphine initiation. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of PW associated with the 4 aforementioned predefined factors.
The cohort included 226 patients (150 [66.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 38.6 [10.8] years). Overall, 26 patients (11.5%) met criteria for PW. Among patients with PW, median change in COWS score was 9 points (IQR, 6-13 points). Of 123 patients with confirmed fentanyl use, 20 (16.3%) had PW. In unadjusted and adjusted models, BMI of 30 or greater compared with less than 25 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.12; 95% CI, 1.31-19.92) and urine fentanyl concentration of 200 ng/mL or greater compared with less than 20 ng/mL (AOR, 8.37; 95% CI, 1.60-43.89) were associated with PW.
In this retrospective cohort study, 11.5% of patients developed PW after buprenorphine initiation in ED or hospital settings. Future studies should confirm the rate of PW and assess whether bioaccumulated fentanyl is a risk factor for PW.
丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)是安全有效的,但在治疗开始时出现阿片类药物戒断与治疗期间的保留率较差有关。由于芬太尼在毒品供应中取代了海洛因,病例报告和调查表明,丁丙诺啡诱发的戒断(PW)的关注度增加;然而,一些观察性研究发现 PW 的发生率较低。
估计急诊室(ED)或住院患者中丁丙诺啡 PW 的发生率,并评估与 PW 相关的因素。
设计、地点和参与者:这是宾夕法尼亚州费城的 3 所学术医院进行的回顾性队列研究,纳入了接受传统或高剂量丁丙诺啡起始治疗的 OUD 成年人,起始治疗时间为 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日。排除标准包括低剂量丁丙诺啡起始治疗和在接受丁丙诺啡后 4 小时内未记录阿片类药物戒断严重程度。
COWS 评分为 8 或更高的患者接受至少 2 毫克舌下丁丙诺啡的初始剂量,随后开始丁丙诺啡治疗。其他暴露因素包括 4 个可能与 PW 相关的预设因素:丁丙诺啡起始前阿片类药物戒断的严重程度(COWS 评分 8-12 与≥13)、丁丙诺啡的初始剂量(2 与 4 或≥8 毫克)、体重指数(BMI)(<25 与 25-<30 或≥30;体重以千克为单位,身高以米为单位)和尿液中芬太尼浓度(0-<20 与 20-<200 或≥200ng/mL)。
主要结果是 PW 发生率,定义为丁丙诺啡起始后 4 小时内 COWS 评分较起始前增加 5 分或以上。使用逻辑回归估计与上述 4 个预设因素相关的 PW 发生几率。
该队列包括 226 名患者(150 名[66.4%]男性;平均[标准差]年龄,38.6[10.8]岁)。总体而言,26 名患者(11.5%)符合 PW 标准。在出现 PW 的患者中,COWS 评分中位数变化为 9 分(IQR,6-13 分)。在 123 名经确认使用芬太尼的患者中,有 20 名(16.3%)出现 PW。在未调整和调整模型中,BMI 为 30 或更高与 BMI<25(调整后的优势比[AOR],5.12;95%CI,1.31-19.92)和尿液中芬太尼浓度为 200ng/mL 或更高与尿液中芬太尼浓度<20ng/mL(AOR,8.37;95%CI,1.60-43.89)与 PW 相关。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,11.5%的患者在 ED 或医院环境中接受丁丙诺啡治疗后出现 PW。未来的研究应确认 PW 的发生率,并评估生物蓄积的芬太尼是否是 PW 的风险因素。