Suppr超能文献

为使用芬太尼的人群进行门诊低剂量丁丙诺啡起始治疗。

Outpatient Low-Dose Initiation of Buprenorphine for People Using Fentanyl.

作者信息

Suen Leslie W, Chiang Amy Y, Jones Benjamin L H, Soran Christine S, Geier Michelle, Snyder Hannah R, Neuhaus John, Myers Janet J, Knight Kelly R, Bazazi Alexander R, Coffin Phillip O

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.

Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2456253. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56253.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The rise of high-potency opioids such as fentanyl makes buprenorphine initiation challenging due to the risks of precipitated withdrawal, prompting the exploration of strategies, such as low-dose initiation (LDI) of buprenorphine. However, no comparative studies on LDI outcomes exist.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outpatient outcomes associated with 2 LDI protocols of buprenorphine among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) using fentanyl.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed data on adults with OUD who self-reported daily fentanyl use and underwent buprenorphine initiation using LDI. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 2 substance use disorder treatment clinics using a specialty behavioral health pharmacy in San Francisco, California, from May 2021 to November 2022.

EXPOSURES

Type of LDI protocol selected by individuals: 4-day or 7-day protocol.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was successful buprenorphine initiation, defined as self-reported LDI completion and pickup of a refill maintenance prescription, and buprenorphine retention. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations assessed associations between LDI protocol (4-day vs 7-day) and successful initiation, adjusting for multiple attempts, age, gender identity, race and ethnicity, and housing status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate buprenorphine retention, and survival curves were adjusted using a fitted Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 126 individuals (median [IQR] age, 35 [29-44] years; 90 identified as men [71%]; 26 [21%] identified as Black or African American, 20 [16%] as Latine, and 66 [52%] as White individuals) with 175 initiation attempts were included. Across attempts, 72 (41%) had a 4-day LDI protocol and 103 (59%) had a 7-day protocol. Initiation was successful in 60 attempts (34%), including 27 (38%) among 4-day protocol and 29 (28%) among 7-day protocol attempts. Buprenorphine retention rate at 28 days was 21% for a 4-day protocol and 18% for a 7-day protocol. Logistic regression found no significant differences between LDI protocols and successful initiation, while repeated LDI attempts had lower odds of success (second attempt: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.30 [95% CI, 0.14-0.66]; third or more attempt: AOR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.09-0.53]). Unadjusted and adjusted survival models did not detect a significant difference in retention between LDI protocol types.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that among people with OUD using fentanyl and attempting outpatient LDI of buprenorphine, successful buprenorphine initiation and retention rates were low. Future studies should examine interventions to improve LDI success and increase buprenorphine uptake and retention.

摘要

重要性

芬太尼等高剂量阿片类药物的兴起,使得丁丙诺啡的起始治疗颇具挑战性,因为存在引发戒断反应的风险,这促使人们探索如丁丙诺啡低剂量起始治疗(LDI)等策略。然而,目前尚无关于LDI疗效的对比研究。

目的

评估在使用芬太尼的阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)患者中,两种丁丙诺啡LDI方案的门诊治疗效果。

设计、背景和参与者:这项队列研究分析了自我报告每日使用芬太尼且采用LDI开始使用丁丙诺啡的成年OUD患者的数据。数据于2021年5月至2022年11月从加利福尼亚州旧金山两家使用专业行为健康药房的物质使用障碍治疗诊所的电子健康记录中提取。

暴露因素

患者选择的LDI方案类型:4天或7天方案。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为丁丙诺啡起始治疗成功,定义为自我报告完成LDI并领取补充维持处方,以及丁丙诺啡的留存率。采用广义估计方程的逻辑回归评估LDI方案(4天与7天)与起始治疗成功之间的关联,并对多次尝试、年龄、性别认同、种族和族裔以及住房状况进行调整。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线估计丁丙诺啡的留存率,并使用拟合的Cox比例风险回归模型对生存曲线进行调整。

结果

共纳入126名患者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为35[29 - 44]岁;90名被认定为男性[71%];26名[21%]被认定为黑人或非裔美国人,20名[16%]为拉丁裔,66名[52%]为白人),共进行了175次起始治疗尝试。在所有尝试中,72次(41%)采用4天LDI方案,103次(59%)采用7天方案。60次尝试(34%)起始治疗成功,其中4天方案中有27次(38%)成功,7天方案中有29次(28%)成功。4天方案28天的丁丙诺啡留存率为21%,7天方案为18%。逻辑回归发现LDI方案与起始治疗成功之间无显著差异,而多次LDI尝试成功的几率较低(第二次尝试:调整后优势比[AOR],0.30[95%置信区间,0.14 - 0.66];第三次或更多次尝试:AOR,0.22[95%置信区间,0.09 - 0.53])。未调整和调整后的生存模型均未检测到LDI方案类型在留存率方面的显著差异。

结论和意义

这项队列研究发现,在使用芬太尼且尝试门诊LDI使用丁丙诺啡的OUD患者中,丁丙诺啡起始治疗成功和留存率较低。未来的研究应探讨改善LDI成功率以及提高丁丙诺啡的接受度和留存率的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b88d/11762237/342142e38297/jamanetwopen-e2456253-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验