Suppr超能文献

如何在流行病学研究中改进农药的暴露评估?来自 IMPRESS 项目的见解。

How can exposure assessment for pesticides in epidemiological studies be improved? Insights from the IMPRESS project.

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2024 Oct;192:109013. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109013. Epub 2024 Sep 15.

Abstract

The IMPRoving Exposure aSSessment Methodologies for Epidemiological Studies on Pesticides (IMPRESS) project (http://www.impress-project.org/) aimed to further the understanding of the performance of pesticide exposure assessment methods (EAMs). To achieve this the IMPRESS project used two approaches to assess EAM performance, using existing and newly collected data from five studies from three different countries and use of published secondary data to undertake three meta-analyses for selected chronic health outcomes. Based on the findings of the IMPRESS project we provide in this paper insights on the overarching research question "How can exposure assessments for pesticides in epidemiological studies be improved"? Exposure assessment is a critical component of pesticide epidemiological studies. EAMs used and epidemiological practices employed need to reflect the changing nature and complexities of pesticide exposure in various occupational settings. To properly assess the association between exposure and selected health outcomes, the choice of EAM should provide a clear exposure contrast within the study population. Acquiring a practical understanding of the pesticide use practices is crucial to determine whether factors such as frequency or intensity of exposure have to be considered in planned analyses. Biomonitoring may be more beneficially applied intensively in a focussed exposure assessment analysis of a particular cohort, which can be used to determine the most relevant exposure factors within that cohort-specific context. Overall, improving pesticide exposure assessment in epidemiological studies requires a multi-disciplinary approach. A next step for the wider scientific community may be to consider the development of a decision tree to aid the selection of suitable EAMs. Such a decision tree would need to consider and be based on multiple parameters including, but not limited to, study type, health endpoint, socio-demographic context, farming system, pesticide used, and application methods.

摘要

IMPRESS 项目(http://www.impress-project.org/)旨在进一步了解农药流行病学研究中暴露评估方法(EAMs)的性能。为了实现这一目标,IMPRESS 项目采用了两种方法来评估 EAM 性能,使用来自三个不同国家的五项研究的现有和新收集的数据,并利用已发表的二次数据对选定的慢性健康结果进行了三项荟萃分析。基于 IMPRESS 项目的研究结果,我们在本文中提供了关于“如何改进农药流行病学研究中的暴露评估?”这一总体研究问题的见解。暴露评估是农药流行病学研究的关键组成部分。使用的 EAMs 和采用的流行病学实践需要反映不同职业环境中农药暴露的不断变化的性质和复杂性。为了正确评估暴露与选定健康结果之间的关联,EAM 的选择应在研究人群中提供明确的暴露对比。要确定是否需要在计划分析中考虑暴露频率或强度等因素,就必须对农药使用实践有实际的了解。生物监测可以在特定队列的重点暴露评估分析中更有效地集中应用,以确定该队列特定环境中最相关的暴露因素。总体而言,需要采取多学科方法来改进农药流行病学研究中的暴露评估。科学界的下一步可能是考虑开发决策树来帮助选择合适的 EAMs。这种决策树需要考虑并基于多个参数,包括但不限于研究类型、健康终点、社会人口背景、农业系统、使用的农药和应用方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验