Social Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Nov 11;78(12):782-784. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-223088.
The recent paper by Dunn showed that the positive relationship between US state-level income inequality and mortality was small in the 1950s, rose to a large value around 1990 but had largely disappeared by 2019. We consider these findings in the context of the mechanisms that have been advanced for reasons why a positive relationship might be expected, and in relation to studies using alternative methods included in systematic reviews that fail to confirm an independent inequality/mortality relationship. Ecological studies, such as by Dunn , using subnational data have advantages compared with similar studies using cross-national data, but controls are typically confined to those available from sources such as decennial census, so scope for incorporating lagged effects and life course factors is limited. However, they are often the only studies with the statistical power to identify subnational differentials and time trends so they are complementary to rarely available sources such as high-quality long-term individual-level microdata data required for causal analyses. Income equality can arise not only due to citizens' positive preferences but also to external choices such as economic decline and globalisation, so examining the wider context is important when explaining excess levels of 'deaths of despair' in low-inequality US states. The apparent increasingly strong association between income levels and low mortality with a weakening inequality/mortality relationship has implications for policy recommendations.
邓恩最近的一篇论文表明,20 世纪 50 年代,美国各州收入不平等与死亡率之间呈正相关关系,但这种关系很小,到 1990 年左右上升到一个较大的值,但到 2019 年已基本消失。我们在探讨这些发现时,考虑了已经提出的解释为什么可能存在正相关关系的机制,并结合了系统评价中使用替代方法的研究,这些研究未能证实不平等与死亡率之间存在独立关系。邓恩等使用次国家级数据的生态研究与使用跨国数据的类似研究相比具有优势,但控制通常仅限于人口普查等来源提供的数据,因此纳入滞后效应和生命历程因素的范围有限。然而,它们通常是唯一具有识别次国家级差异和时间趋势的统计能力的研究,因此对于很少有来源(例如因果分析所需的高质量长期个人微观数据)的研究是一种补充。收入平等不仅可能是由于公民的积极偏好,也可能是由于经济衰退和全球化等外部选择,因此在解释美国低不平等州“绝望之死”的过高水平时,考察更广泛的背景非常重要。收入水平与低死亡率之间的关联越来越强,而不平等与死亡率之间的关系越来越弱,这对政策建议有影响。