• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚女性在孕期药物试验方面的风险承受能力和决策过程。

The risk tolerance and decision-making processes of Australian women regarding medication trials in pregnancy.

作者信息

Quattrini Eva, Ireland Demelza J, Keelan Jeffrey A

机构信息

School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Apr;65(2):218-226. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13884. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.13884
PMID:39333018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12099191/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women have historically been excluded from participation in medication trials, in part due to the perceived risks of drug exposure to mothers and fetuses. However, little is known about pregnant women's attitudes toward risk and participation in such trials.

AIMS

To address this knowledge gap and to identify factors that influence trial participation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Australian women over the age of 18, currently pregnant or within six months of delivery, were recruited to participate in an online survey (n = 623) and follow-up interviews (n = 11). The survey investigated willingness to participate in five hypothetical drug trial scenarios of varying risk. Demographic and obstetric information, including COVID-19 vaccination status, was also collected. The impact of these factors on trial participation was analysed using ordinal regression. Interviews were subjected to thematic framework analysis using a priori and emergent themes.

RESULTS

Nearly half of the respondents (48%) indicated a willingness to participate in at least one of the hypothetical trials. As trial risk increased participation likelihood decreased, especially if the risk was to the fetus, regardless of benefits to the mother. COVID-19 vaccination status and medication hesitancy were predictors of an unwillingness to participate. Three broad themes emerged from the qualitative data: risk-benefit analysis, quality of evidence, and trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, participants expressed a positive attitude toward research and medication trials during pregnancy, but were concerned about fetal risk. The findings of this study may help enhance trial design and the participation of pregnant women in medication trials.

摘要

背景

历史上孕妇一直被排除在药物试验参与之外,部分原因是人们认为药物暴露会对母亲和胎儿造成风险。然而,对于孕妇对风险的态度以及参与此类试验的情况知之甚少。

目的

填补这一知识空白,并确定影响试验参与的因素。

材料与方法

招募年龄在18岁以上、目前怀孕或在分娩后六个月内的澳大利亚女性参与在线调查(n = 623)和后续访谈(n = 11)。该调查研究了参与五种不同风险的假设药物试验场景的意愿。还收集了人口统计学和产科信息,包括新冠疫苗接种状况。使用有序回归分析这些因素对试验参与的影响。访谈采用先验主题和新出现主题进行主题框架分析。

结果

近一半的受访者(48%)表示愿意参与至少一种假设试验。随着试验风险增加,参与可能性降低,尤其是当风险涉及胎儿时,无论对母亲有无益处。新冠疫苗接种状况和用药犹豫是不愿意参与的预测因素。定性数据中出现了三个广泛的主题:风险效益分析、证据质量和信任。

结论

总体而言,参与者对孕期研究和药物试验表达了积极态度,但担心胎儿风险。本研究结果可能有助于改进试验设计以及孕妇参与药物试验的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/91cdb36d4f1f/AJO-65-218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/e61d1c486d92/AJO-65-218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/ffba47cee0cc/AJO-65-218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/91cdb36d4f1f/AJO-65-218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/e61d1c486d92/AJO-65-218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/ffba47cee0cc/AJO-65-218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5712/12099191/91cdb36d4f1f/AJO-65-218-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The risk tolerance and decision-making processes of Australian women regarding medication trials in pregnancy.澳大利亚女性在孕期药物试验方面的风险承受能力和决策过程。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Apr;65(2):218-226. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13884. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
2
Navigating vaccination in pregnancy: Qualitative study in 21 ethnically diverse pregnant women.孕期疫苗接种指南:对21名不同种族孕妇的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0310823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310823. eCollection 2025.
3
Understanding willingness and barriers to participate in clinical trials during pregnancy and lactation: findings from a US study.了解孕妇和哺乳期参与临床试验的意愿和障碍:来自美国的一项研究结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 26;24(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06710-w.
4
Pregnant women's perceptions of risks and benefits when considering participation in vaccine trials.孕妇在考虑参与疫苗试验时对风险和收益的看法。
Vaccine. 2020 Oct 14;38(44):6922-6929. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.059. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review.影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女参与临床试验的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 30;21(5):e1004405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405. eCollection 2024 May.
6
life': a mixed-methods study of pregnant women's COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy.“生活': 一项混合方法研究孕妇对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的犹豫。”
Psychol Health. 2024 Dec;39(12):1706-1726. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2214569. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Attitudes of pregnant women toward vaccination against COVID-19 - a study conducted in Poland in the first quarter of 2022.孕妇对新冠病毒疫苗接种的态度——2022年第一季度在波兰开展的一项研究
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024 Dec;32(4):225-230. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a8177.
8
Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination and Clinical Trials Among Saudi University Students.沙特大学生对新冠疫苗接种及临床试验的态度
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s44197-025-00393-y.
9
A qualitative exploration of Australian women's vaccination experiences and information needs for routine, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in pregnancy.对澳大利亚女性在孕期接种常规疫苗、新冠疫苗和呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗的经历及信息需求的定性探索。
Midwifery. 2025 Jul;146:104402. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104402. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
10
Pregnant women's experiences of and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: A qualitative descriptive study.孕妇对新冠病毒疫苗接种的体验与态度:一项质性描述性研究
Vaccine. 2025 Mar 19;50:126835. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126835. Epub 2025 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific, ethical, and legal considerations for the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical trials.将孕妇纳入临床试验的科学、伦理和法律考虑因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;227(6):805-811. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.037. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
To comply or not comply? A latent profile analysis of behaviours and attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic.遵守还是不遵守?新冠疫情期间行为和态度的潜在剖面分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0255268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255268. eCollection 2021.
3
Obstetrical, fetal, and lactation pharmacology-a crisis that can no longer be ignored.
产科、胎儿和哺乳期药理学——一个不容忽视的危机。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.002.
4
How to use and assess qualitative research methods.如何使用和评估定性研究方法。
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z. eCollection 2020.
5
Participation of Ghanaian pregnant women in an antimalarial drug trial: willingness, experiences and perceptions.加纳孕妇参与抗疟药物试验的意愿、经验和看法。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jun 2;115(6):714-719. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa120.
6
Pregnant women's perceptions of risks and benefits when considering participation in vaccine trials.孕妇在考虑参与疫苗试验时对风险和收益的看法。
Vaccine. 2020 Oct 14;38(44):6922-6929. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.059. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
7
Mistrust in biomedical research and vaccine hesitancy: the forefront challenge in the battle against COVID-19 in Italy.对生物医学研究的不信任和对疫苗的犹豫:意大利抗击 COVID-19 斗争中的前沿挑战。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):785-788. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00675-8. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
The moral imperative to approve pregnant women's participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications.批准孕妇参与针对妊娠和新生儿并发症的随机临床试验的道德必要性。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2019 Sep 6;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13010-019-0081-8.
9
Reasons given by pregnant women for participating in a clinical trial aimed at preventing premature delivery: a qualitative analysis.孕妇参与旨在预防早产的临床试验的原因:定性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2240-8.
10
Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians' decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies.用于研究临床医生决策的案例法:在国际疾病分类第11版实地研究中的有效性、实用性及应用
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;15(2):160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 29.