Suppr超能文献

频闪光疗法治疗成人诵读困难:效果非常有限,仅限于有严重阅读障碍的个体。

Pulsed lighting for adults with Dyslexia: very limited impact, confined to individuals with severe reading deficits.

机构信息

Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73273-3.

Abstract

The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of pulsed lighting on the reading performance of young adults with dyslexia. A total of 42 participants were recruited, including individuals diagnosed with developmental dyslexia and adults without reported reading difficulties. The severity of each participant's reading deficit was assessed on a continuous scale using a reading impairment score, derived from four reading tests: an isolated-word reading test, a pseudoword reading test, and two reading fluency tests. The impairment score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 4 (severe impairment across all tests). To examine the potential effect of pulsed lighting, we measured (1) sentence reading speed, expressed as a reading accessibility index (ACC), and (2) text comprehension, expressed as a comprehension score. These measures were taken under three lighting conditions: standard lighting, pulsed lighting, and a combination of the two. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to assess the effects of lighting on ACC and comprehension, controlling for the reading impairment score. We found no effect of lighting conditions on either ACC or comprehension, except in the most impaired readers, who showed a small but significant increase of 7% in ACC. However, even with pulsed lighting, impaired readers did not reach the performance level of skilled adult readers. In conclusion, the study did not demonstrate a clear positive impact of pulsed lighting on the reading skills of adults with dyslexia.

摘要

本研究旨在评估脉冲光对伴有诵读困难的年轻成年人阅读表现的影响。共招募了 42 名参与者,包括被诊断为发育性诵读困难的个体和没有报告阅读困难的成年人。使用阅读障碍评分,从四个阅读测试(孤立单词阅读测试、伪单词阅读测试和两个阅读流畅性测试)中连续评估每个参与者阅读缺陷的严重程度。阅读障碍评分范围从 0(无阅读障碍)到 4(所有测试均严重障碍)。为了检验脉冲光的潜在影响,我们测量了(1)句子阅读速度,用阅读可达性指数(ACC)表示,和(2)文本理解,用理解分数表示。在三种照明条件下进行了这些测量:标准照明、脉冲照明和两者的组合。应用线性混合效应模型来评估照明对 ACC 和理解的影响,同时控制阅读障碍评分。我们发现照明条件对 ACC 或理解都没有影响,除了在阅读障碍最严重的读者中,他们的 ACC 有 7%的微小但显著的增加。然而,即使使用脉冲光,阅读障碍者也没有达到熟练成年读者的表现水平。总之,本研究没有表明脉冲光对诵读困难成年人阅读技能有明显的积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/804c/11436632/34c32e28fcaf/41598_2024_73273_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验