• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病管理中的经济激励措施:一项系统综述。

Financial incentives in the management of diabetes: a systematic review.

作者信息

Zhang Qingqing, Wei Xue, Zheng Jing, Lu Yu, Wu Yucheng

机构信息

Department of Pan-Vascular Management Center, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Department of Endocrinology, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 366 Taihu Road, Hailing District, Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00579-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12962-024-00579-4
PMID:39334364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11438360/
Abstract

METHODS

Web of Science, Cochrane library and PubMed were systematically searched up to January 2024 to identify studies examining the impact of financial incentives on diabetes management in patients. Studies were evaluated based on the robustness of their methodology, participant numbers, and quality scores. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was applied for randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for non-randomized controlled trials to assess study quality. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, a narrative synthesis approach was utilized.

RESULTS

In the study, we included 12 published research studies. Five studies investigated the influence of financial incentives on patient behavior, all demonstrating a significant positive impact on behaviors such as blood glucose monitoring, medication adherence, and physical activity. 10 studies analyzed the impact of financial incentives on HbA1c levels in diabetes patients. Among them, 5 studies reported that financial incentives could improve HbA1c levels through longitudinal historical comparisons. The other 5 studies did not find significant improvements compared to the control group. Three studies explored long-term effects, two studies targeting the adolescent population had no impact, and one study targeting adults had a positive impact.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this review found that financial incentives can positively influence patient behavior and enhance compliance, but their impact on HbA1c levels is inconsistent. Financial incentives may help adult patients maintain behavior even after the withdrawal of incentives.

摘要

方法

截至2024年1月,对Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和PubMed进行了系统检索,以确定研究财务激励措施对患者糖尿病管理影响的研究。根据研究方法的稳健性、参与者数量和质量评分对研究进行评估。Cochrane偏倚风险工具用于随机对照试验,而纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于非随机对照试验以评估研究质量。由于纳入研究的异质性,采用了叙述性综合分析方法。

结果

在该研究中,我们纳入了12项已发表的研究。5项研究调查了财务激励措施对患者行为的影响,均表明对血糖监测、药物依从性和体育活动等行为有显著的积极影响。10项研究分析了财务激励措施对糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的影响。其中,5项研究报告称,通过纵向历史比较,财务激励措施可改善HbA1c水平。另外5项研究与对照组相比未发现显著改善。3项研究探讨了长期影响,两项针对青少年人群的研究没有影响,一项针对成年人的研究有积极影响。

结论

总之,本综述发现财务激励措施可对患者行为产生积极影响并提高依从性,但其对HbA1c水平的影响并不一致。财务激励措施可能有助于成年患者即使在激励措施撤销后仍能维持行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/dd3efca649dd/12962_2024_579_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/03d48bc9c1ff/12962_2024_579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/3728476ae2df/12962_2024_579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/b82b90d1fea1/12962_2024_579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/dd3efca649dd/12962_2024_579_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/03d48bc9c1ff/12962_2024_579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/3728476ae2df/12962_2024_579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/b82b90d1fea1/12962_2024_579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/11438360/dd3efca649dd/12962_2024_579_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Financial incentives in the management of diabetes: a systematic review.糖尿病管理中的经济激励措施:一项系统综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00579-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
4
5
An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes.评估经济激励措施在改变医疗保健专业人员行为和患者结局方面有效性的综述概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD009255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009255.
6
Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives to Improve Self-Management and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于流程和结果的财务激励措施对改善新加坡 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理和血糖控制的随机对照试验。
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00491-y. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Trial to Incentivise Adherence for Diabetes (TRIAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.激励糖尿病患者坚持治疗(TRIAD)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Nov 17;18(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2288-6.
9
Patient financial incentives to improve asthma management: a systematic review.患者财务激励改善哮喘管理:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e070761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070761.
10
The impact of financial incentives on the implementation of asthma or diabetes self-management: A systematic review.经济激励措施对哮喘或糖尿病自我管理实施情况的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 6;12(11):e0187478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187478. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Barriers and Interventions to Diabetes Self-Management in Latino Youth: A Scoping Review.拉丁裔青少年糖尿病自我管理的障碍与干预措施映射:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;12(7):882. doi: 10.3390/children12070882.
2
Financial Incentives, Income Supplementation, Cash Transfer, and Universal Basic Income Interventions in Diabetes: Understanding Differences and Effectiveness: A Scoping Review.糖尿病领域中的经济激励、收入补充、现金转移和普遍基本收入干预措施:理解差异与有效性:一项范围综述
Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):306-323. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0072.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of an mHealth App That Uses Financial Incentives and Gamification to Promote Health Behavior Change in Adolescents and Caregivers: Protocol for a Clinic-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.利用移动健康应用程序中的经济激励和游戏化促进青少年和照顾者健康行为改变的效果:一项基于诊所的随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 10;13:e63505. doi: 10.2196/63505.
2
The Impact of Financial Incentives on Behavior and Self-Management of Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: Pre- and Post-Quasiexperimental Study.经济激励对未控制的2型糖尿病患者行为及自我管理的影响:准实验前后研究
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Jun 8;4(3):88-95. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-45. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Increasing diabetes testing adherence with incentives in rural Northwestern Ontario.
在安大略省西北部农村地区通过激励措施提高糖尿病检测依从性。
Can J Rural Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;28(1):18-24. doi: 10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_11_22.
4
Delay Discounting in Established and Proposed Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.已确立和拟议的行为成瘾中的延迟折扣:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Nov 26;15:786358. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.786358. eCollection 2021.
5
Long-Term Effects of Financial Incentives for General Practitioners on Quality Indicators in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care-A Follow-Up Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial.全科医生经济激励对基层医疗中糖尿病患者治疗质量指标的长期影响——一项整群随机平行对照试验的随访分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 26;8:664510. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.664510. eCollection 2021.
6
A Pilot Study of Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Initiating Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop System While Receiving a Behavioral Economics Intervention.一项针对接受行为经济学干预的 1 型糖尿病青少年使用混合闭环系统的初步研究。
Endocr Pract. 2021 Jun;27(6):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives to improve glycemic control in adults with diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial.经济激励对改善成年糖尿病患者血糖控制的成本效益:一项试点随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248762. eCollection 2021.
8
Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives to Improve Self-Management and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于流程和结果的财务激励措施对改善新加坡 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理和血糖控制的随机对照试验。
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00491-y. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
9
Financial incentives versus standard of care to improve patient compliance with live kidney donor follow-up: protocol for a multi-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.经济激励与标准护理对提高活体肾供体随访患者依从性的比较:一项多中心、平行组随机对照试验方案
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Nov 9;21(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02117-9.
10
Psycho-social and educational interventions for enhancing adherence to dialysis in adults with end-stage renal disease: A meta-analysis.心理社会和教育干预措施对提高终末期肾病成人透析患者依从性的效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2834-2848. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15301. Epub 2020 May 11.