Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 27;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01863-5.
Transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive (TGE) persons experience pregnancies and have abortions, yet abortion care remains rooted in a gender binary, often centering the needs, experiences, and challenges of cisgender women. Despite guidance supporting gender-affirming sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH), barriers for TGE people seeking abortions persist. We conducted an exploratory case study with key informants to understand their perception of TGE abortion seekers' needs with specific considerations for those in restrictive abortion settings.
Qualitative interviews focused on gender-affirming care and abortion provision were conducted with U.S.-based key informant clinicians (n = 4) who could provide powerful insights into gaps and experiences faced by TGE individuals. Participants were eligible if they currently or previously provided abortions and had experience practicing gender-affirming care. Interviews focused on informants' perceptions of TGE patients' needs when seeking abortions.
Findings highlight the unique barriers TGE patients face when seeking abortions, including lack of provider knowledge, in-clinic stigmatization, and gender marginalization. It is notable that key informants who practiced in abortion-protective political environments have greater access to resources to implement gender-affirming care than those in restrictive contexts. Results are summarized in a clinical recommendations document which provides an accessible starting point for clinicians to begin building gender-inclusive abortion spaces.
It is necessary to further understand barriers facing TGE abortion seekers and integrate recommendations and emerging evidence into abortion practice. This study contributes to a growing knowledge base which emphasizes the need for inclusive abortion spaces and highlights key considerations for improving access and quality for TGE abortions seekers.
跨性别者、非二元性别者和性别扩展者(TGE)经历妊娠并进行堕胎,但堕胎护理仍然根植于性别二元论,往往以顺性别女性的需求、经验和挑战为中心。尽管有支持性别认同的性和生殖健康护理(SRH)的指导,但 TGE 人群寻求堕胎仍然存在障碍。我们对主要知情人进行了探索性案例研究,以了解他们对 TGE 堕胎寻求者需求的看法,并特别考虑了在限制堕胎环境中的人。
对美国的 4 名主要知情人临床医生进行了以性别认同护理和堕胎提供为重点的定性访谈,他们可以深入了解 TGE 个人面临的差距和经验。参与者如果目前或以前提供过堕胎服务,并具有实施性别认同护理的经验,则有资格参加。访谈重点是知情人对寻求堕胎的 TGE 患者需求的看法。
研究结果突出了 TGE 患者在寻求堕胎时面临的独特障碍,包括缺乏提供者的知识、临床耻辱化和性别边缘化。值得注意的是,在堕胎保护政治环境中执业的主要知情人比在限制环境中执业的人更有机会获得实施性别认同护理的资源。研究结果总结在一份临床建议文件中,为临床医生提供了一个易于理解的起点,以便开始建立包容性别认同的堕胎空间。
有必要进一步了解 TGE 堕胎寻求者面临的障碍,并将建议和新出现的证据纳入堕胎实践中。本研究有助于建立一个不断增长的知识库,强调需要包容的堕胎空间,并强调改善 TGE 堕胎寻求者获得服务和质量的关键考虑因素。