• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国联邦宪法堕胎权被取消前 12 个月,在有保护和限制堕胎政策的州寻求诊所堕胎的患者特征。

Characteristics of abortion patients in protected and restricted states accessing clinic-based care 12 months prior to the elimination of the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States.

机构信息

Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jun;55(2):80-85. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12224. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.12224
PMID:37038835
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a result of the June 2022 decision of the United States (US) Supreme Court, as many as 24 states have, or are expected to, ban or severely restrict abortion. We provide baseline information about abortion patients living in different state environments prior to this decision.

METHODS

We obtained surveys from 6674 women, transgender men, and other pregnancy capable individuals accessing abortion care at 56 facilities across the US between June 2021 and July 2022. The final analytic sample uses information from 5930 abortion patients to compare the demographic and situational profiles of those living in the 24 states likely to ban abortion (restricted) to those living in states where it is likely to remain legal (protected).

RESULTS

Compared to respondents who lived in protected states, abortion patients in restricted states were more likely to be Black (39% vs. 30%) or white (35% vs. 28%) and less likely to be Latinx (18% vs. 32%). Respondents in restricted states were more likely to be paying out-of-pocket for care (87% vs. 42%), be relying on financial assistance (22% vs. 11%), and indicate that it was difficult to pay for the abortion (54% vs. 28%). Twelve percent of respondents who lived in a restricted state crossed state lines for care and the majority (59%) was going to another restricted state.

DISCUSSION

Prior to June 2022, abortion patients in restricted states encountered more situational and financial barriers compared to those in protected states. These barriers have undoubtedly been exacerbated by abortion bans.

摘要

背景

由于美国(US)最高法院 2022 年 6 月的一项裁决,多达 24 个州已经或将禁止或严格限制堕胎。我们提供了在这一决定之前,生活在不同州环境中的堕胎患者的基本信息。

方法

我们从 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 7 月在美国 56 家堕胎护理机构接受堕胎护理的 6674 名女性、跨性别男性和其他有生育能力的个人那里获得了调查。最终分析样本使用了 5930 名堕胎患者的信息,比较了生活在可能禁止堕胎的 24 个州(受限州)和可能保持合法的州(受保护州)的患者的人口统计学和情况概况。

结果

与生活在受保护州的受访者相比,生活在受限州的堕胎患者更有可能是黑人(39%比 30%)或白人(35%比 28%),而拉丁裔(18%比 32%)的比例较低。受限州的受访者更有可能自费支付护理费用(87%比 42%)、依赖经济援助(22%比 11%),并表示难以支付堕胎费用(54%比 28%)。12%生活在受限州的受访者跨越州界寻求护理,大多数(59%)是前往另一个受限州。

讨论

在 2022 年 6 月之前,与生活在受保护州的患者相比,生活在受限州的堕胎患者遇到了更多的情况和经济障碍。这些障碍无疑因堕胎禁令而加剧。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of abortion patients in protected and restricted states accessing clinic-based care 12 months prior to the elimination of the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States.美国联邦宪法堕胎权被取消前 12 个月,在有保护和限制堕胎政策的州寻求诊所堕胎的患者特征。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jun;55(2):80-85. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12224. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
3
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
4
Characteristics of people obtaining medication vs procedural abortions in clinical settings in the United States: Findings from the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.美国临床环境中药物流产与手术流产人群特征:2021-2022 年流产患者调查结果。
Contraception. 2023 Dec;128:110137. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110137. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
5
Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.违背人民意愿:美国最高法院推翻堕胎权。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Oct-Dec;VII(4):261-263. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2022.057. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
6
Association Between Restricted Abortion Access and Child Entries Into the Foster Care System.限制堕胎服务与儿童进入寄养系统之间的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;178(1):37-44. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4738.
7
Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence.部分分娩堕胎:堕胎法理学的最后前沿。
Issues Law Med. 1998 Summer;14(1):3-57.
8
Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.对医疗补助计划堕胎的限制可能会因州宪法理由而面临挑战。
Fam Plann Popul Rep. 1980 Dec;9(6):95-8.
9
The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid.法院与医疗补助计划下的选择性堕胎
Soc Serv Rev. 1980 Mar;54(1):124-34. doi: 10.1086/643808.
10
Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.堕胎:权利还是技术细节?罗诉韦德案与德国联邦宪法法院堕胎判决之比较
Hum Life Rev. 1975 Summer;1(3):60-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Over-the-Counter Oral Contraceptive Use and Initiation of Contraception.非处方口服避孕药的使用与避孕措施的开始
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27438.
2
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.使用列表实验解决调查中堕胎报告不足的问题:美国两个州的终生和五年堕胎发生率以及社会人口学关联的多变量估计
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
Advancing knowledge and public health: a scientific exploration of abortion safety.
推进知识与公共卫生:堕胎安全性的科学探索
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08053-z.
4
Abortion care preferences and trade-offs when traveling out-of-state for facility-based services: findings from a discrete choice experiment.前往州外接受机构化服务时的堕胎护理偏好与权衡:离散选择实验的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12005-9.
5
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.《2022 年美国堕胎监测报告》
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 Nov 28;73(7):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.
6
Measuring abortion in claims data: What is the state of the science?在理赔数据中衡量堕胎情况:科学现状如何?
Contraception. 2025 Feb;142:110750. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110750. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
7
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
8
Catastrophic Health Expenditures for In-State and Out-of-State Abortion Care.州内和州外堕胎护理的灾难性医疗支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444146. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146.
9
Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision.多布斯诉杰克逊案前后的在线药物流产直接向患者提供服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2434675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34675.
10
"Trust Women": Characteristics of and learnings from patients of a Shield Law medication abortion practice in the United States.“相信女性”:美国一项“盾牌法”药物流产实践中患者的特点和经验教训。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):295-302. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12287. Epub 2024 Sep 30.