Shibata Yuichi, Hirai Jun, Mori Nobuaki, Asai Nobuhiro, Hagihara Mao, Mikamo Hiroshige
Department of Pharmacy, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan.
Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Aug 25;13(9):804. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090804.
The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on the use of inpatient broad-spectrum antibiotics for more than 10 days using days of therapy (DOT) and a novel metric called days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) to assess whether the antimicrobial spectrum was narrowed. Conducted at Aichi Medical University Hospital in Japan, the study compared a six-month baseline period (April to September 2022) with a six-month intervention period (April to September 2023). The primary outcome measures were changes in DOT/patient and DASC/patient for broad-spectrum antibiotics. Propensity score matching was performed between two periods and a total of 172 patients were included in the study (pre-intervention, n = 86; intervention, n = 86). The DASC/patient of broad-spectrum antibiotics was statistically decreased in the intervention period compared to that in the baseline period (153.3 vs. 122.7, < 0.05). Additionally, our PAF intervention led to a switch to narrow-spectrum antimicrobial therapy without increasing all-cause 30-day mortality (5.8% vs. 5.8%, = 1.0). However, the DOT/patient, DASC/patient, and DASC/DOT of all antimicrobials were not significantly changed. Our study concluded that we should reconsider the timing of PAF intervention by evaluating the effort of PAF by using DOT and DASC.
本研究旨在评估前瞻性审核与反馈(PAF)对住院患者使用超过10天的广谱抗生素的影响,采用治疗天数(DOT)以及一种名为抗生素谱覆盖天数(DASC)的新指标来评估抗菌谱是否变窄。该研究在日本爱知医科大学医院进行,将六个月的基线期(2022年4月至9月)与六个月的干预期(2023年4月至9月)进行了比较。主要结局指标为广谱抗生素的DOT/患者和DASC/患者的变化。在两个时期之间进行了倾向得分匹配,共有172例患者纳入研究(干预前,n = 86;干预后,n = 86)。与基线期相比,干预期广谱抗生素的DASC/患者在统计学上有所下降(153.3对122.7,<0.05)。此外,我们的PAF干预导致了向窄谱抗菌治疗的转变,且未增加全因30天死亡率(5.8%对5.8%,=1.0)。然而,所有抗菌药物的DOT/患者、DASC/患者和DASC/DOT均无显著变化。我们的研究得出结论,应通过使用DOT和DASC评估PAF的效果,重新考虑PAF干预的时机。