Domingo-Boluda Carolina, Dualde Diego, Taberner-Bonastre Teresa, Soler Miguel, López-Campos Fernando
Hospital Universitario La Ribera (HULR), 46600 Alzira, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;16(18):3170. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183170.
Locally advanced rectal cancer requires a multimodal treatment. Radiotherapy is being explored for intensification to improve the rates of pathological complete responses (ypCR rates) which are correlated with better outcomes. This study reports a comparison between standard versus escalated doses in a preoperative scenario. The ypCR rates, toxicity, postoperative complications, and disease-free and overall survival at 5 years are described. From 2012 to 2019, 99 patients were analyzed retrospectively: standard arm (mean of 47.5 Gy) vs. dose-escalated arm (mean of 54.3 Gy). All patients were treated with 3DRT in 25 fractions, with concomitant capecitabine and surgery performed according to the total mesorectal excision principles in both arms. The ypCR was reported using the "College of American Pathologist grades"; the gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was reported using the "Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events" (CTCAE 4.0). The ypCR rates were higher in the dose-escalated group (25% vs. 10.64%; = 0.07), with a lower rate of non-treatment response (61.36% vs. 38.64%; = 0.11). No statistical differences between the arms were found in terms of the oncological outcomes, postoperative complications ( = 0.15), second surgeries ( = 0.62), or deaths ( = 0.62). The CTCAE acute GI and GU toxicity were grade I or II in both arms. Our study presents a long-term follow-up in comparative cohorts.
局部进展期直肠癌需要多模式治疗。目前正在探索强化放疗以提高病理完全缓解率(ypCR率),该率与更好的预后相关。本研究报告了术前标准剂量与递增剂量之间的比较。描述了ypCR率、毒性、术后并发症以及5年无病生存率和总生存率。2012年至2019年,对99例患者进行了回顾性分析:标准剂量组(平均47.5 Gy)与递增剂量组(平均54.3 Gy)。所有患者均接受25分次的三维适形放疗,两组均联合卡培他滨,并根据直肠系膜全切除原则进行手术。ypCR采用“美国病理学家学会分级”报告;胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性采用“不良事件通用术语标准”(CTCAE 4.0)报告。递增剂量组的ypCR率更高(25%对10.64%;P = 0.07),未治疗反应率更低(61.36%对38.64%;P = 0.11)。两组在肿瘤学结局、术后并发症(P = 0.15)、二次手术(P = 0.62)或死亡(P = 0.62)方面未发现统计学差异。两组的CTCAE急性GI和GU毒性均为I级或II级。我们的研究展示了对比较队列的长期随访。