Chojak Małgorzata, Gawron Anna, Czechowska-Bieluga Marta, Różański Andrzej, Sarzyńska-Mazurek Ewa, Stachyra-Sokulska Anna
Instytut of Pedagogy, Uniwersity of Marie Curie-Sklodowska, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.
Instytut of Psychology, Uniwersity of Marie Curie-Sklodowska, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.
Brain Sci. 2024 Sep 21;14(9):944. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090944.
The aim of this study was to verify whether the level of mental resilience would differentiate reading comprehension performance when using different information carriers. More than 150 people filled out a test regarding the level of resilience. They then participated in a survey using fNIRS. Their task was to read a one-page informational text and answer several questions. The results showed no differences in correct answers between groups of people with different levels of resilience. In the groups of people with high and low levels of resilience, the number of correct answers was not differentiated by the type of carrier. Among those with moderate levels of resilience, better results were obtained by those who read text printed on paper. Analyses of neuronal mechanisms showed that the type of carrier differentiated brain activity in each group. Obtaining the same number of correct answers in the test was the result of different neuronal mechanisms activated in those who used a computer and those who read a printed text.
本研究的目的是验证在使用不同信息载体时，心理复原力水平是否会使阅读理解表现产生差异。150多人填写了一份关于复原力水平的测试。然后他们参与了一项使用功能近红外光谱技术（fNIRS）的调查。他们的任务是阅读一篇单页信息文本并回答几个问题。结果显示，不同复原力水平的人群在正确答案方面没有差异。在高复原力水平和低复原力水平的人群组中，正确答案的数量不因载体类型而有差异。在中等复原力水平的人群中，阅读纸质文本的人取得了更好的成绩。对神经元机制的分析表明，载体类型在每组中使大脑活动产生了差异。在测试中获得相同数量的正确答案是由于使用电脑的人和阅读印刷文本的人激活了不同的神经元机制。
