Application of the 5th WHO Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Lung Carcinoma in Small Lung Biopsies in a Tertiary Care Center: Is Insecurity of Pathologists for the Accurate Diagnosis Justified?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of lung carcinoma (LC) is currently performed in small biopsies and according to the WHO classification by using limited stains to spare tissue for molecular testing. This procedure, however, often causes diagnostic uncertainty among pathologists.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we compared the diagnosis made by these guidelines in 288 lung biopsies with that using more stains, as retrieved from our archive. We also compared the results of p63 and p40 immunoexpression and investigated the diagnostic role of p53/Rb1.

RESULTS

In our investigation, we reached a definite diagnosis with a mean number of one stain compared with six stains in the original diagnostic procedure, with a 97.3% concordance rate. Only in the case of metastases, a clear advantage is proven in the use of more stains, especially in the absence of clinical information. We also found a comparable utility of p40 and p63 for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, despite the higher p63 expression in other histological types. Moreover, normal p53/Rb1 expression could be utilized for the exclusion of small-cell LC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the diagnostic certainty achieved by the suggestions of the WHO classification and justifies the potential insecurity in the absence of adequate communication with the treating clinician.